Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

PM Cameron asks us to "remember the economic value BP brings to people in Britain and America."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 06:47 PM
Original message
PM Cameron asks us to "remember the economic value BP brings to people in Britain and America."
U.K. Speaks Out in Defense of BP
British officials offer first public signs of support for company in face of heightened criticism from U.S.

By ALISTAIR MACDONALD And GUY CHAZAN


BP CEO Tony Hayward stood in the BP command center updating reporters on efforts to clean up oil spill off the Louisiana coast on June 3 in Houston.

The British government took a first and tentative step Thursday to intervene in the row between oil giant BP PLC and President Barack Obama, asking the U.S. to "remember the economic value BP brings to people in Britain and America."

U.K. Prime Minister David Cameron also said he expected to discuss BP and the fallout from the spreading Gulf of Mexico oil spill, among other issues, in a previously scheduled weekend call with U.S. President Barack Obama.

As many as 50,000 barrels of oil per day may have flowed into the Gulf before it was partly contained on June 3, the U.S. Geological Survey says. Purdue University's Steven Wereley, a key member of the group making the assessment, talks with WSJ's Robert Lee Hotz about the new flow estimates.

MoreBP Stock Plunges as U.S. Ramps Up Tab Berms Getting Built, but Doubts Persist In Louisiana, Scrambling for Work Deal Journal: Will PetroChina Acquire BP? OpinionDrilling Bits of Fiction .

"The Prime Minister is…clear that we need constructive solutions and that we remember the economic value BP brings to people in Britain and America," Treasury chief George Osborne said Thursday in an e-mailed statement to the Wall Street Journal. Mr. Cameron, currently in Afghanistan, had asked Mr. Osborne to call embattled BP CEO Tony Hayward.

In Washington, President Obama Thursday appeared to edge back from his position that BP should subsidize the wages of U.S. workers idled because of the administration's moratorium on deepwater oil drilling in the Gulf, suggesting that the law doesn't give him the authority to make that demand.

Congress must "update the laws to make sure that the people in the Gulf, the fishermen, the hotel owners, families who are dependent for their livelihoods in the Gulf, that they are all made whole," he said at the end of a meeting with the leadership of Congress.

<SNIP>

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704312104575297841925243062.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. Oh brother
Then they can put down their cup of tea, take off their skirts, brush their bad teeth, and grab and damn mop and help out with the cleanup.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izquierdista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. When you do things RIGHT
When you fuck things up, you DESTROY economic value, capisce?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Indeed, Sir: The Old Question 'But What have You Done For Me Lately?' Comes To Mind
Actually paying off all the damage here, and proper criminal fines, would certainly amount to a decade or two of the 'economic value', ie. 'profit' B.P. has provided....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TCJ70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
4. Investments come with risks...
...thanks for taking part in capitalism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
5. Blow it out your arse, you grotty little wanker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
6. Cameron can go screw off. Let's talk about the monumental economic devastation BP has brought to the
US. I am in no mood for this kind of bullshit talk.

:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muntrv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
7. Hey Cameron! To quote Monty Python: I FAHT IN YOUR GENERAL DIRECTION!!!!
Edited on Thu Jun-10-10 07:28 PM by muntrv
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
8. The British Tories and their oil
Britain will have to invade Iran after all if its got no BP. Isn't Shell registed in London too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lil Missy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
9. remember, you can always kiss my ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
10. I think BP has the funds for this - they're still selling oil and pumping other wells, right?
As a matter of fact, they told us they had the $$$ to cover the dividend payments as well as pay for the Gulf. I'm hoping they pay far more than they ever thought they would, but even then, I think they can handle it.

I DO feel sorry for those whose pensions are invested in BP - like those who lost so much with Enron. :(

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
11. Hey PM. We don't need any advice about who or what to remember.
Keep your fascist swill to yourself. Go home immediately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NavyMom Donating Member (170 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
12. Fuck 'em, nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vicar In A Tutu Donating Member (298 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
13. BP is 39% American owned, 40% British.
Edited on Thu Jun-10-10 10:02 PM by Vicar In A Tutu
That has to be kept in mind, for a couple of contrasting reasons - Firstly, the idea that this is solely a "British problem" and secondly that Obama speaking out against BP was not "anti-British" rhetoric. I find it, perhaps, a shade disappointing that it's been labelled "British Petroleum" seemingly deliberately when that name is no longer accurate. Perhaps it's a bad, 12 year out of date briefing, perhaps it's Bush style dog whistling.

I am British, as it happens. I also happen to love the United States having spent a considerable amount of time there in the past, and hopefully far more time at some point in the not too distant future. I find some of the comments made on this forum recently regrettable but understandable given the effects of the leak.

As for the comments seeping out from the arse cracks of some of our right-wing politicians over the last couple of days, I offer this: I don't think any members of the British government should be putting forth anything but solidarity with the concept that BP should pay for what they are accountable for. This is fair. I heard evil old Dark Lord Norman Tebbit today mention a lack of culpability taken by American companies in the past, but I would suspect this is more down to gutlessness on the part of other governments in pressing for compensation where necessary.

Yes, it's a shame about pensions which could be hit, which is the line most commonly wheeled out by the right-wing British press - although 25% of the American stock in BP is also owned by pension funds - but ultimately the key is to clearing this mess up and helping those who've had their lives turned upside down and inside out.

I think Obama's only mistake is using the "British Petroleum" name because it's allowed him to fall victim to typical right-wing 'gotcha!' politics on this side of the pond. My opinion is that he has every right to criticise 'BP' and, frankly, has to. It's his job to solve the environmental and economic catastrophe afflicting so much of the USA as a result of this. As far as I'm aware, he wasn't also elected Prime Minister of Great Britain. His duty is to look out for the United States. I'm sorry but not surprised that large chunks of the right-wing press in the UK - aided sneakily by the Tories - are doing their best to criticise him for that.

Unlike said press entities, I don't see the "OMFG WAR ON BRITTAAAAIIIIN!" from Obama that they do. But if you've kept an eye on the r/w media here, you'll know that it's an agenda they've been peddling for years. Just because he is from the wrong party and doesn't felate at the alter of Churchill and perhaps, just perhaps, because he isn't the right colour.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. I didn't know that the ownership was almost half and half.
Obama is also criticizing a corporation, not a country. I don't get why Cameron and Brits would be so sensitive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vicar In A Tutu Donating Member (298 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. I think...
...Cameron is trying to be diplomatic. He has a lot of real right-wing shite hawks in his party. The relative lack of comment is about the best I could have expected from him (I have a natural, inbuilt loathing of Tories, so I expect very little).

Of course, I THINK he should be out expressing that BP must pay for whatever they're found culpable, but....

As I said in my post, it's really the right-wing who are being reactionary. I mean, you know what it's like. We all know that politicians and media from that part of the political spectrum are shady arseholes who'll stop at nothing to get their agenda to the fore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Right wingers are everywhere, in every country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #14
20. Exactly! Why are they trying to make it into a US vs. Britain thing?
that's just wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
15. Fuck you Dave!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neverforget Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
16. Cameron to the US: It's just a flesh wound!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-10-10 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
19. They need to make it All Right and then they
can talk about what BP has done for America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
21. Tell that to all the fisherman of the Gulf.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-12-10 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
22. Arguably, they add more value than than the banksters
Though now that we've seen up close and personal some of the externalized costs involved, the comparison gets more "interesting."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mimosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 08:27 AM
Response to Original message
23. British papers have not mentioned any particular concern about the poisoning of the environment
I've been shocked at the editorials I've read in British papers.

They have viciously and unfairly attacked President Obama, whom they once lauded, using terms like rabid, rabble-rousing and such. *ick*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vicar In A Tutu Donating Member (298 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #23
31. You have to remember that the British right-wing (responsible for the anti-Obama rhetoric)...
Edited on Sun Jun-13-10 03:34 PM by Vicar In A Tutu
...have to spew their crap in print. They cannot do so on TV with abandon as they do in the US, so they have to let off steam in a less visceral setting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
24. Play that "too big to fail" card, Cameron.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
25. No surprise, their bought-and-paid-for politicians are as tone deaf as ours
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
26. BP and their flunky politicians are still trying to dupe us
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
27. Is that Jean-Luc Picard in the background of that picture?
It sure looks a lot like him.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
28. Investments can be risky propositions. I don't want British pensioners
to suffer, but BP has made a blunder of epic proportions and they must be held financially responsible. That said, I'm beginning to doubt any amount of money will be make much difference in repairing our planet. The reports of cracks in the sea bed are terrifying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mimosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #28
32. 'The reports of cracks in the sea bed are terrifying' Amen to that. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
29. What "economic value" does BP bring to the United States?
:shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
30. What Cameron would not admit on the record
is that he probably wishes right about now that he had LOST the election.


"Bloody Hell, I wish this had all happened while that wanker Brown was in office"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mimosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. I bet that's true, Sebastian. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
craigmatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-13-10 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
34. Obama should squeeze BP anyways and help topple the conservatives in
the UK while helping people here at the sametime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC