Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is General Petraeus seriously considered to be a possible Republican candidate in 2012?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Jackeens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 10:38 PM
Original message
Is General Petraeus seriously considered to be a possible Republican candidate in 2012?
Just read this in the (UK) Guardian:

Here you have a liberal Democratic president who probably did not receive 51% of the votes of top Pentagon brass...Post-Vietnam Democratic presidents are always tugged by the urge to win the approval of that laurelled cohort. Even more so in this case, when one member of the high military brain trust, General David Petraeus, looms as a possible Republican presidential candidate in 2012, and when a substantial portion of the public doesn't even think the president is a "real" American.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/michaeltomasky/2009/dec/02/michael-tomasky-barack-obama-troops

Sorry if this speculation is common knowledge, I hadn't heard it before.

But bloody hell, if there is any truth to it, how absurd is this conflict of interest?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 10:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. Sounds like a lot of MSM crap
probably written by some bored reporter.

Just to be safe Obama could give him the Joint Chiefs Chairmanship.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackeens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I wouldn't call The Guardian MSM, but it's the first time I came across this, eh, prediction.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. If this escalation does not work ... which it won't and, heaven forbid ...
we are hit within the USA by a terrorist attack again, say WELCOME to President Petraeus come 2012.

That's because President Obama does NOT have the moral courage to ADMIT that we need to pull our troops out of both Muslim Nations.

Every day we are occupying these nations, AMERICANS are less safe. Keeping these occupation going and now escalating the troop numbers in Afghanistan is "A GREEN LIGHT" for terrorist organizations all over the world to act.

This is a grave mistake by President Obama that will lead to us "clinging to" right wing republicans for at least a generation.

When things get REAL BAD, I'm becoming A-POLITICAL because we will have NO Civil Liberties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojambo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. He won't head a ticket.
I could see him garnering interest as a running mate, particularly if Palin gets the nomination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Palin is not bright enough to run the nation and has made too many enemies of the GOP elite.
I could see Gingrich/Petraeus ticket if our nation goes into FEAR and IGNORANCE and chooses security over sanity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
6. While I have a lot of respect for Gen. Petreus, our country has
never been big on Generals for President. Yes, Ike was the exception.
It might not be wise for Petreus being so close to time in Military

Perhaps once he is out of the Military.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DonkeyHoTay Donating Member (81 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Let's resurrect Walt Kelly's "Pogo for President" campaign...
It sure worked decades ago against McCarthyism. Maybe this generation needs to read Pogo cartoons.
"We have seen the enemy and he is us."

In the meantime, as we try to muster our opposition to this futile war, we are bruised, confused and in Walt Kelly's words, "slightly decomposed" after last night's speech - - Here are the lyrics:

Walt Kelly - Slopposition

Oh, once the opposition was completely opposed,
To all the supposition that was generally supposed,
But now the superstitions that were thought to be imposed,
Are seen by composition to be slightly decomposed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thothmes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 05:51 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. Did you forget about President Ulysses S. Grant.
Edited on Thu Dec-03-09 05:59 AM by Thothmes
On edit, How about General George Washington, General Andrew Jackson, General Zackery Taylor, General Rutherford Hayes, General James Garfield.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knightinwhitesatin Donating Member (266 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. ummm 12 out of 44 is more than 25%
Ulysses S. Grant, Rutherford B. Hayes, Garfield, Benjamin Harrison and Dwight D. Eisenhower were Republicans.

George Washington, belonged to no party, and William Henry Harrison and Zachary Taylor were elected as Whigs.

Andrew Jackson, Franklin Pierce and James Garfield and Andrew Johnson were elected as Democrats.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imajika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
8. Not going to happen...
The Republicans only mention his name sometimes out of desperation.

Right now they have a crop of awful potential candidates and are throwing his name out there hoping he is a more conservative version of Powell who can ride to the rescue and save them.

I know it is early yet, but seriously, look at what the GOP has to offer up so for in 2012. It's a joke. Palin? Huckabee? Gingrich? These are not serious candidates. Romney isn't well liked with the GOP for many reasons, primary of which is that he is a political chameleon who changes his colors to suit whatever constituency he is standing in front of. MassCare is not popular among Republican primary voters as just one example.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NC_Nurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 11:57 PM
Response to Original message
9. No. Most people are more interested in domestic issues at this point. Unless
terrorism ratchets up domestically, or the economy is suddenly healed, I don't think he has a chance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 12:29 AM
Response to Original message
10. THe US will be so god damn tired of wars by then, that guy wouldn't
even be considered for a county agent job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 12:41 AM
Response to Original message
11. No, Peaches isn't that vain .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-03-09 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
14. If General Clark could hardly get any traction,
I'm not sure what General Patraeus has done
that would somehow let him close to the job.

I don't think so.

Maybe as Palin's Veep!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC