Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Justice Dept: We’re Still Buying Replacement for Guantanamo

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 06:56 AM
Original message
Justice Dept: We’re Still Buying Replacement for Guantanamo
http://washingtonindependent.com/87902/justice-dept-were-still-buying-replacement-for-guantanamo

Justice Dept: We’re Still Buying Replacement for Guantanamo
By Spencer Ackerman 6/21/10 6:59 PM


Apparently Robert Gibbs wasn’t playing. After the House Armed Services Committee expressly forbade the Defense Department from spending any money to purchase the Thomson Corrections Center in Illinois, the linchpin of President Obama’s pledge to close the detention facility at Guantanamo Bay, the White House press secretary said the administration could still authorize the Justice Department to buy the estimated $350 million prison from the state of Illinois. And that appears to be in play.

Christi Parsons reports for the Chicago Tribune:

Writing to members of the Illinois delegation in Congress, Asst. Atty. Gen. Ronald Weich reaffirmed the administration’s “commitment to acquiring the facility this year,” and provided details about steps planned for the next few months.

The Justice Department’s Bureau of Prisons plans to hire and train employees while other administration officials “work with Congress to obtain authorization and funding for a portion of the Thomson facility,” Weich wrote in the letter, obtained by the Tribune Washington bureau.


No timetable for the purchase, though. Will Obama punt on this until after the midterm elections?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
zipplewrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 07:01 AM
Response to Original message
1. Close it , don't move it.
He campaigned on closing Gitmo, not just changing the address. I really don't think anyone was complaining WHERE it was. Their concerns were WHAT it was. Packing it up and moving it to Illinois really doesn't change anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 07:07 AM
Response to Original message
2. So much for that promise,
Besides, even if Gitmo is closed, we always still have Bagram AFB.

I guess that change thing isn't working out so well, just another game of three card monte.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
3. It's not the existence of the place itself, but the reasons for putting
anyone there that matters. They can still have detention centers for people properly detained under the law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC