Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Majorities Don't Last Forever-The Democrats lost, but they shouldn't act defeated.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 07:42 PM
Original message
Majorities Don't Last Forever-The Democrats lost, but they shouldn't act defeated.
http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?article=majorities_dont_last_forever

Majorities Don't Last Forever

The Democrats lost, but they shouldn't act defeated.
Adam Serwer | November 4, 2010 | web only

snip//


Democrats and liberals would do well to learn from the GOP's discipline in the aftermath of 2008. They should ignore the empty demands from media opinion-makers to "tack to the center," and double their efforts to, if not get progressive legislation passed, articulate why progressive solutions can help solve problems Republicans don't even want to acknowledge. The Republican identity-politics narrative that Tuesday's results represent Real America Taking Back Its Country is belied by the actual results.

Democrats were slaughtered at the polls regardless of how subservient they were to the larger Democratic agenda -- maverick Sen. Russ Feingold was true to his liberaltarian character in opposing both TARP and the PATRIOT Act, and he lost to an empty suit with an R next to his name. Voting against the Affordable Care Act didn't make conservadems any safer -- more than half of Democrats who voted against the ACA lost their seats. The America that went to the polls in 2010 isn't any more "real" than the one that handed Democrats the White House and the biggest majority in decades in 2008, but it was older, whiter, and more Republican. And even this far more conservative electorate balked at electing many of the most rightward Republican candidates in statewide races where their radical beliefs faced greater scrutiny from the press.

That 2008 electorate could be back in force in 2012, but they will need a reason to show up other than re-electing the president that stirred their hopes two years ago. When Scott Brown defeated Martha Coakely to replace Ted Kennedy in the Senate last year, Democrats responded with a pathetic display of teeth-gnashing and hand-wringing self-pity before eventually pulling themselves together to pass the Affordable Care Act. Instead of returning to Congress "chastened" by political defeat, Democrats should redouble their efforts to do what they can during the lame-duck session, in particular ending the military's discriminatory "don't ask, don't tell" policy and passing the DREAM Act. In states like California, Colorado, and particularly Nevada, Hispanic voters came through for Democrats, preventing a Republican wave from turning into an outright tsunami. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, in particular, owes his victory against Sharron Angle to Hispanics in Nevada who gave him nine out of 10 of their votes. The number of people these acts would directly affect is relatively small. But wiping away the last vestiges of legalized systemic discrimination has an outsize symbolic meaning to Obama voters who saw in the first black president a vision of an American future where such things no longer exist.

The last thing Democrats should do is indulge in public rituals of consternation and apology, promising to be more subservient to the interests of the wealthy and more deferential to cultural biases against Hispanics and gays and lesbians. There's already a party that does that.

As Tom Perriello wrote to his supporters after losing his seat in Virginia, "Real change does not happen with one election night victory or end with one loss. We shouldn't have expected nirvana after our win in 2008 and we shouldn't expect armageddon now."

Majorities don't last forever, and if there's anything to be learned from Tuesday, it's that a lot can change in two years. But Democrats have to be willing to recognize, as Republicans did in 2008, that surrender is not a strategy. It ain't over till it's over, and in democratic politics, it's never over.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'm not defeated, but that doesn't matter --what will The President do?
and will he act like a winner or a loser?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-04-10 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Do you expect an answer from me? I don't know. As far as
I'm concerned, he's acted like a winner so far, so why would he stop?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC