Notice how Ed Schultz is quick to jump on the President but not Conservative Democrats

[bigdarryl]

Just something to keep in the back of your mind. Because they are the problem in the party and he rarely talks about them sometimes I wonder if Ed is an impostor master raiding as a Progressive at times trying to divide the party against the President.

[dennis4868]

1. Agree...

If it was not for these conservative dems and a moderate repub or 2 in the senate, Obama would have been able to get through congress tax cuts for the middle class ONLY. Last night and the last few weeks, Ed has only gone after Obama as if he can wave a magic wand and get rid of the fillubuster in the senate....

[Ikonoklast]

2. Because he IS one.

Schultz is the farthest thing from a progressive one can be.

He's playing a part, and changed sides to make money because right field was waaay too crowded.


I am suspect of almost anyone that has to holler for a dollar.

[bigdarryl]

5. Cenk is another one of those so-called turned Pregressives who was a rethug

he also doesn't go after the blue dog democrats as much as he does the President

[Phx_Dem]

3. Schutz used to be and probably still is a Republican.

[VMI Dem]

4. Aren't you always quoting what "Big Ed" says?

:shrug:

[bigdarryl]

8. True I am but I am really starting to question his constent RANTING!!! of

President Obama and not going after blue dog democrats I've had this felling since the start of the health care debate.I think Randy said it best QUOTE:People act like the President is in charge of the Congress and Senate if they want to stop a bill from getting thru there is NOTHING the President can do about it 1 Senator can filibuster a bill she's right

[pocoloco]

6. Short memory?

Forget who the fuck is supposed to be in charge?

[truthspeak]

7. Liberals eat their own babies...

[bigdarryl]

9. Mike Malloy once said there are a lot of people on radio claiming to be

Progressives that aren't

[mazzarro]

10. This is total nonsense.

Ed Schultz is right to jump on Obama who is supposedly the leader of the party. If Obama cannot bring the leadership of the party to enforce discipline on congressional democrats then he is the right person to be blamed for it. Why is Obama always turning to the conservative democrats to move the issues that he favored in his election campaign? Why do legislators like Max Baucus, Joe Lieberman or Ben Nelson get better support from the WH to lead on issues Obama favors yet they have never been called to favor the party line? Yes he - Obama deserve to be blamed if the democratic party's mechanism is ineffectual particularly since he got rid of Howard Dean as DNC chairman.

[mediaman007]

11. Obama has taken our identity away.

People now know that Democrats stand for nothing.

[golddigger]

12. BS! Ed jumps on both. And about dividing the party

Obama and his advisors are doing more to divide the so-called than any pundit can do.

[frylock]

13. the buck stops somewhere over here >>>>>>>

or is it over there?