Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pelosi Gets Win on Energy Tax Credit (Tax Deal)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 06:49 PM
Original message
Pelosi Gets Win on Energy Tax Credit (Tax Deal)
PELOSI GETS WIN ON ENERGY TAX CREDIT, per a little bird: At a House Caucus meeting this week, Vice President Biden and members of the Obama economic team (Jack Lew and Gene Sperling) got an earful from Speaker Pelosi and some of her colleagues about the fact that despite a big push from the V.P., the Republicans had not agreed to put 1603 -- a popular tax credit for renewable energy and green jobs -- into the tax framework. Pelosi called it a “must change.” The administration urgently got the message to Senators Baucus and Reid that if there was one thing to add to the tax extenders for the House, it was 1603. Baucus and Reid -- who had also gotten a earful on 1603 from Senators Cantwell, Feinstein and Boxer -- were able to get Republicans to agree to 1603 at the last minute, giving Pelosi a big victory on green jobs -- and tangible proof that she had improved at least part of the tax framework that the administration had initially presented the House.

http://www.politico.com/playbook/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Zenlitened Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. How dare she criticize the President's agreement with Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. Very positive
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. Cool Beans!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
4. This is how it's supposed to work
Good for Pelosi, Biden, Reid, Baucus, and Obama.

The pushback on the tax deal is as good as the tax deal itself for Democrats (that includes the Sanders pseudo-filibuster). For close to a solid week, all we've heard about is Democratic wants on this thing. Again, this is good.

You put it out there and get the pushback. For some reason, this is seen as evil, when in fact it's precisely what we should be doing. The GOP has added jack squat to this debate, and has come off, rather, as the ones insisting on unpopular provisions. You could do a lot worse than that, politically, and policy-wise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stopbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
5. Big effing deal.
Edited on Sun Dec-12-10 07:26 PM by stopbush
IIRC, this amounts to about $3.5B a year.

Compared to the $140b over two years for rich people and the $300-b in middle class tax cuts, it's pretty small fry.

Apparently, this is what passes for a legislative "victory" among D purists these days. "Pelosi strong arms tax credit equal to 2% of tax cut for the rich" isn't exactly a great headline, even if it's truthful.

Sad.

And I say that as a big fan of Nancy Pelosi.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. they're into bone-tossing, sb
takes the place of real change
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Not the point....
.... the point is that she's trying to improve the package ... not stop it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CakeGrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
6. k/r
A constructive development.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
7. I hope she's not referring to the corn, ethanol subsidies. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
8. Increasing corn ethanol subsidies is neither green nor a victory for anyone but agribusiness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-12-10 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. +1 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 03:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC