Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama admin. plans defense cuts that nearly top GOP’s entire first-year austerity pledge

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-11 05:44 PM
Original message
Obama admin. plans defense cuts that nearly top GOP’s entire first-year austerity pledge
Obama admin. plans defense cuts that nearly top GOP’s entire first-year austerity pledge

By David Edwards
Thursday, January 6th, 2011 -- 3:55 pm


Defense Secretary Robert Gates surprised lawmakers Thursday by announcing that the Pentagon would cut spending by $78 billion over the next five years.

The cuts will force the Army and Marine Corps to reduce the number of troops on active duty and eventually freeze military spending for the first time since the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.


The $78 billion comes in addition to $100 billion in cuts that Gates directed the Pentagon to find in May. In a Thursday news conference, the defense secretary said that the armed forces had successfully found $100 billion in savings over the next five years and the Army, Navy and Air Force would get to reallocate that money to combat-related projects.

.......................

The savings nearly equal the $100 billion in spending cuts promised by Republicans this year. However, GOP sources told The Huffington Post's Howard Fineman that the real goal is to cut about $30 billion.

more:
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/01/obamas-oneday-defense-cuts-top-gops-entire-firstyear-austerity-pledge/
http://thehill.com/news-by-subject/defense-homeland-security/136401-gates-surprises-lawmakers-with-plan-to-cut-78-billion-from-defense
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Uzybone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-11 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. once the lobbyists give their orders to the House
I doubt this will pass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-11 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. 'Pass' what?
Doesn't require legislation, does it???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uzybone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-11 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I mean whatever Obama and Gates cut will be reversed by the Housee
I hope I'm wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-11 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Don't know they can do that;; hope not!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-11 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Pentagon is spoiled rotten rich kids
Congress throws money at them time after time.
They actually have to work hard to find ways to spend the $$ put on their table.
Remember the $600 Reagan hammers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
okieinpain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-11 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. he should put tinker air force base at the top of the list. okies hate
the federal government and could really do without all of that government money following into businesses and school districts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveAmerica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-11 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
5. Pull back on money going to contractors in the Middle East
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-11 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
6. Then they'll replace all those goods and services with private contractors...
and we'll be paying 6x as much.

It's win/win for the MICC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevenleser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. It doesnt work that way. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
secondwind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-11 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
8. The Pentagon spends a billion a year on public relations....that's a hefty sum...



maybe they can slash that budget as well!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-06-11 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
10. Takes the wind out of the sails of both ends of the political spectrum..
.... smart man that Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. I disagree-- the pentagon's budget isn't being cut at all-- this is smoke and mirrors....
Instead, the military is rearranging the deck chairs so that they can reallocate those "savings" to combat, prolonging America's immoral wars of aggression. When guns are cut so that we can afford butter, that will be something to cheer. The Pentagon's announcement that it would squeeze a bit more efficiency from its operations in order to afford more bombs is nothing to cheer at all, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevenleser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Proof? Links? Thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
impik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-07-11 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Proofs? Links? Are you kidding me? No need for any of this in la-la-land. They set their
own reality. Take it or leave it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevenleser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-11 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. That was my guess too, but, if they can show me proof, my mind is open to other possibilities
as unlikely as I think they may be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GSLevel9 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-09-11 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
16. oh there's PLENTY of fat on the MIC to shave a few BILLION. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC