Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama to business: Get off the sidelines and invest that $2 trillion in America.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-07-11 02:43 PM
Original message
Obama to business: Get off the sidelines and invest that $2 trillion in America.
Remarks by the President to the Chamber of Commerce

<...>

But I want to be clear: Even as we make America the best place on Earth to do business, businesses also have a responsibility to America.

I understand the challenges you face. I understand you are under incredible pressure to cut costs and keep your margins up. I understand the significance of your obligations to your shareholders and the pressures that are created by quarterly reports. I get it.

But as we work with you to make America a better place to do business, I’m hoping that all of you are thinking what you can do for America. Ask yourselves what you can do to hire more American workers, what you can do to support the American economy and invest in this nation. That’s what I want to talk about today –- the responsibilities we all have -- the mutual responsibilities we have -- to secure the future that we all share.

<...>

But ultimately, winning the future is not just about what the government can do for you to succeed. It’s also about what you can do to help America succeed.

So we were just talking about regulations. Even as we eliminate burdensome regulations, America’s businesses have a responsibility as well to recognize that there are some basic safeguards, some basic standards that are necessary to protect the American people from harm or exploitation. Not every regulation is bad. Not every regulation is burdensome on business. A lot of the regulations that are out there are things that all of us welcome in our lives.

Few of us would want to live in a society without rules that keep our air and water clean; that give consumers the confidence to do everything from investing in financial markets to buying groceries. And the fact is, when standards like these have been proposed in the past, opponents have often warned that they would be an assault on business and free enterprise. We can look at the history in this country. Early drug companies argued the bill creating the FDA would “practically destroy the sale of … remedies in the United States.” That didn’t happen. Auto executives predicted that having to install seatbelts would bring the downfall of their industry. It didn’t happen. The President of the American Bar Association denounced child labor laws as “a communistic effort to nationalize children.” That’s a quote.

None of these things came to pass. In fact, companies adapt and standards often spark competition and innovation. I was travelling when I went up to Penn State to look at some clean energy hubs that have been set up. I was with Steve Chu, my Secretary of Energy. And he won a Nobel Prize in physics, so when you’re in conversations with him you catch about one out of every four things he says. (Laughter.)

But he started talking about energy efficiency and about refrigerators, and he pointed out that the government set modest targets a couple decades ago to start increasing efficiency over time. They were well thought through; they weren’t radical. Companies competed to hit these markers. And they hit them every time, and then exceeded them. And as a result, a typical fridge now costs half as much and uses a quarter of the energy that it once did -- and you don’t have to defrost, chipping at that stuff -- (laughter) -- and then putting the warm water inside the freezer and all that stuff. It saves families and businesses billions of dollars.

So regulations didn’t destroy the industry; it enhanced it and it made our lives better -- if they’re smart, if they’re well designed. And that’s our goal, is to work with you to think through how do we design necessary regulations in a smart way and get rid of regulations that have outlived their usefulness, or don’t work.


I also have to point out the perils of too much regulation are also matched by the dangers of too little. And we saw that in the financial crisis, where the absence of sound rules of the road, that wasn’t good for business. Even if you weren’t in the financial sector it wasn’t good for business. And that’s why, with the help of Paul Volcker, who is here today, we passed a set of common-sense reforms.

The same can be said of health insurance reform. We simply could not continue to accept a status quo that’s made our entire economy less competitive, as we’ve paid more per person for health care than any other nation on Earth. Nobody is even close. And we couldn’t accept a broken system where insurance companies could drop people because they got sick, or families went into bankruptcy because of medical bills.


<...>

So if I’ve got one message, my message is now is the time to invest in America. Now is the time to invest in America. (Applause.) Today, American companies have nearly $2 trillion sitting on their balance sheets. And I know that many of you have told me that you’re waiting for demand to rise before you get off the sidelines and expand, and that with millions of Americans out of work, demand has risen more slowly than any of us would like.

<...>


Also: Government works.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ananda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-07-11 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. Squeak squeak.
Said the widdle mouse to the big kwazy kat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
louis-t Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-07-11 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. Well, he DID ask them nicely.....
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-07-11 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. Well, that should fix everything.
I, for one, am very relieved. O8)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaxx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-07-11 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
4. Contrary to what the anti's are saying, this was a good speech.
K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-07-11 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Not saying much,
just 24/7 snark.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
impik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-07-11 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. Don't confuse them with facts. They will not be happy until
each and every business in the country is dead. Because they are all evil, as you know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polmaven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-11 07:53 AM
Response to Reply #15
25. And, of course, we all know
that businesses are not necessary to employment, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-07-11 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
5. They will buy another villa in the Caribbean or Mediterranean
But people, that is so 20th century.


:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glowing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-07-11 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
6. President Obama, tax them and do it yourself!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-07-11 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #6
17. It's more polite to ask nicely and get rebuffed. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no limit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-07-11 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
7. I'm sure they will get right on that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texshelters Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-07-11 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
9. One solution would have been to NOT bail them out and instead
invest in jobs rebuilding America. Then, you could have pushed the return to the Clinton era tax rates for the top 2% and raise corporate taxes instead of lowering them and then use the money for rail projects, bridges, etc.

Or, you could pass a tax on all good imported by US owned firms using foreign labor, a tax on each worker hired by a US firm to match what it would take to hire a foreign worker. Yes, and we could also impose tariffs on good sold with slave wages. Who cares about a little inflation when no one will have jobs in couple of years.

Just some ideas that will never get passed.

Peace,
Tex Shelters
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-07-11 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Yeah, that sounds good, but
given that Bush screwed up the economy and set it on a path to total collapse, that wasn't an option.


From the COP's June report (PDF):

<...>

Through a series of actions, including the rescue of AIG, the government succeeded in averting a financial collapse, and nothing in this report takes away from that accomplishment. But this victory came at an enormous cost. Billions of taxpayer dollars were put at risk, a marketplace was forever changed, and the confidence of the American people was badly shaken. How the government will manage those costs, both in the specific case of AIG and in the more general case of TARP, remains a central challenge – one the Panel will continue to review.

<...>


It wouldn't have been necessary had the right steps been taken in early 2008, but that did not happen.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texshelters Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-11 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #11
32. Perhaps
but there were better ways to use that money and I am not convinced that it was necessary. Besides, much of the money has come back, allegedly.

Peace,
Tex Shelters
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_Stalwart71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-07-11 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #9
18. Yes, Obama and McCain both voted for TARP, but TARP was Bush's initiative.
TARP, a.k.a., "the bailout," occurred under Bush, not Obama.

This is one fact that shockingly most Americans do not know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texshelters Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-11 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #18
33. I know that
but Obama had billions of stimulus dollars that was not put to productive use. And he did vote for it, and allegedly, a lot of the money has come back. I did suggest other things, geesh!

Peace,
Tex Shelters
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
golfguru Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-07-11 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
10. That should do it...watch the business people fall in line
They were just waiting for the marching orders! Now they got 'em!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinnie From Indy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-07-11 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
12.  And next week the Obama Admin will sign more "Free Trade" agreements
Begging for money from people that are taight to worship it is hardly an effective strategy. This speech would not be nearly so ridiculous if it included even one substantial proposal to generate jobs here in America.

The Obama Administration really, really wants big business to know that they have a friend in the White House in the lead-up to the 2012 elections. For Progressives, the message will be "We're gonna bleed you slower than they will" so vote for us!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ReggieVeggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-07-11 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
13. He's trying to be "business friendly"
for whatever purpose he thinks that might serve

Still, this is a speech, and not a new set of regulations introduced to Congress. Businesses and corporations will do very little to "help America" without being forced to. Obama needs to use a stick, not a carrot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
impik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-07-11 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
14. He makes so much sense all the time, i just want to scream
DO AS HE SAID!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-07-11 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
16. If these so-called job creators have 2 trillion cash on hand....
Why exactly do these folks need tax breaks? So they can have even more cash on hand that they won't use to create jobs? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jakes Progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-07-11 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
19. What's the or else?
Is Obama slow or clueless? Does he think that because he tells them what they ought to do, they will do it? Hell. They know what they should be doing. They know and are steadfastly not doing it. A wagging finger is not going to change their greedy hearts unless the president is willing, able, and promising to stick that finger in their eye if they don't.

Expecting big business to do the right thing is the republican position. Don't tell them that what few restrictions we have were not the cause of the destruction, because they know that. They engineered the weak regulations we have. Tell them that if they don't begin doing the right thing, they will see what a regulated economy is really like.

This has been a presidency of words. The president has spoken well, spoken softly, and spoken loudly. He just forgot the big stick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-07-11 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. "Is Obama slow or clueless? Does he think that because he tells them what they ought to do
...they will."

Yes. The SOTU already generated support.

Facebook, Intel, IBM Join White House in Startup Investment Campaign

As to your other point, he's obviously smarter than most of his critics.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-11 12:20 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. Laughable
Intel and IBM have pledged $350 million and we don't even know how much Facebook or HP have pledged to the Startup America Partnership...

http://www.itchannelplanet.com/business_news/article.php/3923801/IBM,+Intel+Invest+$350+Million+to+Fund+Entrepreneurs+and+New+Business+Opportunities+Under+Government%E2%80%99s+New+Start-up+America+Program

Corporations are sitting on $2 trillion in cash.

What's $350 million out of $2 trillion? That's 0.000175%. :rofl:

That sad part is that they got their tax breaks and they will be increasing the cash in their coffers even more.

This Startup America Partnership is chump change and will do nothing to change the dynamic of the American economy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-11 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #21
26. What's laughable is that
you're laughing at one pledge for a single initiative, business startups. If if it generates a few billion, that's significant.

The amount and initiative are irrelevant to the point, which was a response to the question: "Does he think that because he tells them what they ought to do they will."

In the case of the startup initiative, he asked and they responded.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-11 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. You posted nothing more than corporate public relations propaganda
The Startup America Partnership is nothing more than window dressing and does not address the central issue of corporations hoarding trillions in cash and refusing to higher American workers.

There will be no real impact on our economy from that meager initiative. Those companies involved in the Startup America partnership haven't even pledged to higher workers, they've only pledged a small percentage of their cash on hand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-11 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. "does not address the central issue of corporations hoarding trillions in cash " And
no one said it did. Again:

The amount and initiative are irrelevant to the point, which was a response to the question: "Does he think that because he tells them what they ought to do they will."

In the case of the startup initiative, he asked and they responded.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-11 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. "The amount and initiative are irrelevant to the point"
Edited on Tue Feb-08-11 02:19 PM by Cali_Democrat
Not true. It's very relevant because we get to see if corporations really are interested in spending that $2 trillion and investing in America and American workers. Or are they just window dressing...

Spending only 0.000175% of that $ 2trillion shows that corporations aren't really serious about investing in America. They don't give a shit about this country. They only care about making a profit and public relations.

The Startup America Partnership is nothing more than corporate propaganda and you're lapping it up like a puppy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-11 02:25 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-11 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #22
28. Let's hope those
waiting for Obama to fail are wrong.

I still believe he's smarter than his critics, infinitely smarter.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bodhi BloodWave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-11 07:07 AM
Response to Reply #20
24. one could also argue that he can't use the big stick since a lot of his critics
on the left side of the spectrum have taken it and is beating the president with it >.>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nofurylike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-11 02:46 AM
Response to Original message
23. K&R. thank you for always trying, ProSense. you always make
important and enlightening points.

i wish more knew to learn from you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4_TN_TITANS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-08-11 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
27. One can only wish...
that this was the courteous shot across the bow before he taxes the living shit out of them and uses the money to create government CCC-type jobs.

I'm so sick of 'elegant' speeches.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-09-11 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
34. LOL, corporations are legally required to maximize profit, workers be damned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC