Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Budget raises taxes on rich, multinational corporations; restores BAB, $250 for Soc. Sec. recipients

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-11 11:08 PM
Original message
Budget raises taxes on rich, multinational corporations; restores BAB, $250 for Soc. Sec. recipients

Rejected Tax Increases Return in Obama Budget Plan

By Richard Rubin and Ryan J. Donmoyer

Feb. 14 (Bloomberg) -- President Barack Obama proposed a budget that would raise the taxes of the highest U.S. earners, multinational corporations and oil and gas companies, reviving revenue provisions that Congress has rejected or brushed aside before.

The budget, released today in Washington, would bring back pre-2001 tax rates on income and capital gains for individuals earning more than $200,000 annually and married couples making more than $250,000. The estate tax would return to 2009 levels with a $3.5 million per-person exemption and a 45 percent top rate. Under a law Obama signed in December, lower rates expire at the end of 2012.

<...>

Obama again proposes limits on multinational companies’ ability to defer income taxes on profits they earn outside the U.S. Corporations such as Microsoft Corp. and Cisco Systems Inc. have argued against the proposals in previous years. Those provisions would raise an estimated $129 billion over 10 years.

<...>

The budget revives a proposal that Congress require executives of investment partnerships including private-equity firms to pay ordinary tax rates on the profits they receive as compensation. This pay, known as carried interest, currently can qualify for lower capital gains tax rates. The proposal would raise $14.8 billion over 10 years.

<...>


Also from article, the budget:

    Eliminates $46 billion in oil, gas and coal subsidies

    Restores Build America Bonds program

    Allocates $250 for Social Security recipients


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Betsy Ross Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-11 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. Did I just enter an alternate reality?
I'm not too sophisticated about budget, but it sounds so good. Sure the Republicans will never pass it, but it's good to see it asked for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-11 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Does anyone really care what's in the budget?
There are something in it that Democrats should be demanding and pushing to pass. Republicans are certainly making their demands known.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-11 11:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. Hopefully claw back tax from offshore investments?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
provis99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-11 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. what a completely cynical move by Obama.
He knows damn well the Republicans won't pass any budget he proposes, so he loads up this pretend budget with goodies and sops for the Democratic voters, as if anything was going to pass. If he really thought a budget of his would pass, he would cut out all this liberal stuff and bring in a centrist-right wing pro-rich budget.

He just wants to grandstand to the Democratic base and say "Look at all the goodies I wanted, but the mean Republicans wouldn't pass it!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-11 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Hmmm?
Edited on Mon Feb-14-11 11:36 PM by ProSense
"He knows damn well the Republicans won't pass any budget he proposes, so he loads up this pretend budget with goodies and sops for the Democratic voters, as if anything was going to pass. If he really thought a budget of his would pass, he would cut out all this liberal stuff and bring in a centrist-right wing pro-rich budget."

Most of this was in his past budgets. What should he have done: left all of these things out so people can scream that he's protecting the rich?

Seriously, what are you proposing?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
provis99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-11 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. and how much of it got passed in real budgets? Thats right, nothing.
the budget is created as a compromise between Congress and the President, since the President can veto any bill he doesn't like. What winds up going into the budget is what the President won't compromise on, and what gets left out is what he will compromise on because he doesn't care about it.

This kind of catering to the base has been done at least since Carter. I would appreciate Obama being honest about what he wants in the budget, rather than post a list of goodies he intends to publicize for the base, knowing damn well he will agree to cut all of them out when the budget deal is made with Congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-11 11:45 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. What does this mean?
"I would appreciate Obama being honest about what he wants in the budget"

What should he propose that you consider "honest" that will pass this Republican Congress?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
provis99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-14-11 11:59 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. look at the budgets he signed. That indicates what he wanted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-11 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. The budget he signed
is what Congress finally agreed to and passed. It didn't include everything he wanted.

That's the process, always has been.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-11 04:42 AM
Response to Reply #3
15. Okay then. So what you're saying is that he has no point in doing anything.
Actually your statement would work on everything. And if he rejected a few things in the budge then the dems would say he caved. He just can't win. Whatever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mkultra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-11 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #3
16. this is side B of the "constant sorrow" 45
If he makes a bill that will pass, then he compromised liberal values.
If he attacks with a full barrel of liberal values, he is not being practical.
It just proves that none of the outraged detractors are interested in anything but some hidden agenda.

This budget is a good starting point and im glad ot see it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BklnDem75 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-11 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #3
17. What a crap post
What do you think repukes have been doing for the past two years? So now Obama shouldn't even try because in your mind, it's all pretend? What a steaming load.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
golfguru Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-11 12:00 AM
Response to Original message
9. The real question is....will it create jobs n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bhikkhu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-11 01:29 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. How about - will it decrease income inequality
Federal spending can increase jobs, but increasing jobs while cutting federal spending isn't likely. Or it may be likely, but it will be private sector rather than government at the wheel.

On the other hand, income inequality - the portion of the nations assets concentrated in the hands of the few wealthiest individuals - has been getting worse every year for some time, and historically produces an unstable, crash-prone mess of an ungovernable economy. This budget would change the trend, if it can be passed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-11 01:36 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. There is
this. That will generate jobs and so will the budget for 100,000 more teachers.






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-11 04:40 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. You need to read Prosense's first post on it.
There is money going to shovel ready jobs, and infrastructure building. Renewable energy skill funding, and money for the high speed rail. all of those promote job making.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-11 04:39 AM
Response to Original message
13. Great deal no credit. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bodhi BloodWave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-11 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #13
18. which seems to be the normal thing these days
Doesn't really matter how good a deal is, if there is 10 points and *1* point on the deal is bad then that is the one thing people will obsess over and ignore the 9 good things in it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC