Lasher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-02-11 03:44 PM
Original message |
|
Because when the going gets tough, we quit.
|
Blue_In_AK
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-02-11 03:46 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Sarah will be destroyed by 2012. n/t |
bigwillq
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-02-11 03:49 PM
Response to Original message |
yellowcanine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-02-11 03:54 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Sarah will not accept second fiddle again. She wants to be on top this time. |
|
Sarah on top of Newt? Oh my.
|
JustAnotherGen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-02-11 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
Blue Owl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-02-11 03:57 PM
Response to Original message |
4. There's maybe half a brain between the two of them |
Lynx
(91 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-02-11 04:13 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I'd like to see what happens when she goes rogue.
|
GentryDixon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-02-11 04:32 PM
Response to Original message |
Kennah
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-02-11 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
8. You're talking about the Palin/Walker ticket? |
|
He's the perfect Ken doll counterpart to Caribou Barbie.
Plastic people with hollow heads.
Unfortunately, they aren't neuter.
|
Arkana
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-02-11 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
17. No, that'd be Dumb and Dumberer. |
jenmito
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-02-11 04:50 PM
Response to Original message |
9. Gingrich and Santorum were dropped from Faux's payroll which suggests THEy will run... |
|
Palin (and Huckabee and others) are still on their payroll.
|
Lasher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-02-11 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
12. Well OK, I was just trying to make a funnee. |
ClarkUSA
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-02-11 05:14 PM
Response to Original message |
10. No, thanks. I think the ham sandwich primary option is a dumb idea, too. |
|
Edited on Wed Mar-02-11 05:15 PM by ClarkUSA
Too bad when the going gets tough, some Democratic voters quit instead of organizing against the real enemy: Republicans.
|
Lasher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-02-11 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
11. Maybe you shouldn't preach to me about party loyalty. |
|
I have voted in every primary and general election since I was first eligible in 1972. Every one. I have voted exclusively for Democrats every single time. And I have voted this way because I have believed my whole life that Democratic Party principles should prevail. But I have never been such a fool that I ever thought the primaries should be a foregone conclusion.
How about you, Clark? Be honest, have you been a yellow dog for four decades?
|
ClarkUSA
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-02-11 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
13. lol! I'm not the one who's "preaching". I stand by my statement. |
|
Edited on Wed Mar-02-11 08:00 PM by ClarkUSA
Anonymous personal testimonials are dubious, at best, so why get into a pissing match with someone who has "ham sandwich" POV? It's a waste of my time.
|
Lasher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-02-11 07:44 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
ClarkUSA
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-02-11 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
|
Edited on Wed Mar-02-11 07:55 PM by ClarkUSA
:eyes:
|
Arkana
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-02-11 11:33 PM
Response to Original message |
16. Harry/Lloyd Christmas 2012! |
WI_DEM
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-03-11 02:50 PM
Response to Original message |
18. Newt would be horrible but he isn't stupid, he wouldn't pick Palin to be VP |
cooolandrew
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-04-11 12:36 PM
Response to Original message |
19. What exactly does the VP do anyways except maybe quit I guess. |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sun May 05th 2024, 10:22 PM
Response to Original message |