Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Any politician who peddles this junk is either a fool or a scam artist."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-01-11 02:23 PM
Original message
"Any politician who peddles this junk is either a fool or a scam artist."
Edited on Fri Apr-01-11 02:24 PM by babylonsister
Posted in its entirety with permission.

http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2011_04/028744.php


THE DUMBEST PROPOSED CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT OF ALL TIME.... Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) and other top GOP leaders sent out a message to every Republican in the chamber: GOP senators will be expected to endorse a constitutional amendment mandating a balanced budget. No exceptions.

As of yesterday, the demands were successful -- literally everyone in the 47-member Senate Republican caucus signed on as co-sponsors of the truly ridiculous Balanced Budget Amendment.

The last time the BBA reached the Senate floor, 14 years ago, it came literally just one vote shy of passing. This time, proponents hope enormous deficits, combined with public confusion, have created a more favorable environment.

Indeed, this version of the BBA is even more ambitious -- and more absurd -- than its predecessors. The federal budget would not only have to be balanced, but it would be written into constitutional stone that spending couldn't exceed 18% of GDP without two-thirds supermajorities.

Bruce Bartlett has explained, more than once, why this little gimmick would be a dreadful mistake, but he revisited the issue yesterday, calling the latest version of the Republican plan "mind boggling in its insanity
."

In short, this is quite possibly the stupidest constitutional amendment I think I have ever seen. It looks like it was drafted by a couple of interns on the back of a napkin. Every senator cosponsoring this POS should be ashamed of themselves.


Again, that's a group that includes literally every Republican senator, including the so-called moderates who are presumed to be sane.

Jonathan Bernstein also had a worthwhile piece on this, calling the BBA a "pathetic joke of an amendment," which would very likely make the deficit worse, not better. In apparent reference to the entire Senate GOP caucus, Jonathan concluded, "Any politician who peddles this junk is either a fool or a scam artist."

I'd just add one related thought. The whole idea of the BBA offends me because it's such a cheap cop-out. Policymakers who want to balance the budget can put together a plan to balance the budget. It's hard work, of course, but those who take this goal seriously can put in the effort and craft a plan.

But they don't want to. They don't want to draft a plan to balance the budget, they want a constitutional gimmick that will mandate a policy goal they can't figure out how to accomplish on their own. Instead of effort and intellectual honesty, Senate Republicans prefer the easy way out
(which as Jonathan explained, wouldn't really work anyway).

In other words, those who want a balanced budget amendment should make plain how they'd balance the budget. Otherwise, the scheme is just a silly, cynical charade.

—Steve Benen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-01-11 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. And once again this crap will go nowhere.
What's more, they KNOW it will go nowhere--they're just grandstanding for their crazies at this point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluedeminredstate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-01-11 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. Again, i have to ask:
Where were these con men and women when Bush was pissing away a surplus and starting trillion dollar wars?

Now that our economy actually needs government spending to stimulate the economy and create jobs, these assholes don't want to give the checkbook to a Democrat, especially not a black one!

:banghead:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrSlayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-01-11 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. We would have had the budget balanced by now if the coup of 2000 hadn't occurred.
The stolen election of 2000 is the main culprit in the financial disaster we have been living through the past few years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-01-11 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Goes back to Ray-Gun deregulating the banks. W then piled on. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-01-11 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
4. Oh. I thought this was going to be about "Free Trade".
Oh Well,
the thread title still applies.
K&R




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-01-11 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. I'm good with balancing the budget....
...just impose a "wealth tax" on those 413 wealthiest that are worth a collective $1,500,000,000,000 (1.5 Trillion Dollars).


They could pay the debt of every State, County and Municipality in the country and on average STILL be worth more tha $3,000,000,000 (3 Billion Dollars). Each.

Then tax the next 20% or so for the National Debt. Pay off China. Secure the future for our elderly, our sick, and our children.


It's not that complicated once you get past the corruption.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC