Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Interesting details about the budget deal

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-11 10:48 AM
Original message
Interesting details about the budget deal
Via Greg Sargent

<...>

UPDATE: A Democrat emails the Dem perspective on the wins they secured:

    1) $17 BILLION IN CHIMPS -- WE SPREAD OUT THE CUTS ACROSS OTHER PARTS OF THE BUDGET. We insisted that meeting in the middle on cuts would require looking beyond domestic discretionary spending—and we prevailed. More than half—or $17 billion—of the final round of spending cuts came from changes in mandatory programs, or CHIMPs. The emphasis on this part of the budget staved off severe cuts to key domestic programs like education, clean energy, and medical research.

    2.) $3B IN PENTAGON SAVINGS -- WE PROVED DoD WASTE SHOULD NOT BE SPARED. We won the argument that waste at the Pentagon should not be immune from spending cuts. The final agreement eliminates nearly $3 billion in unnecessary Pentagon spending that was contained in H.R. 1. These reductions are supported by Secretary Gates.

    3) TITLE X PRESERVED -- WE FOUGHT OFF ATTACKS ON WOMEN’S HEALTH. We fended off their highest priority among the riders by nixing their proposal to gut Title X funds that provide cancer screenings and other preventative health services for women. The Republicans’ overreach on this rider in the final days dramatically weakened their hand.


FACTBOX-Details of deal reached to keep US government running

<...>

Changes in mandatory spending, or "CHIMPs" in Washington-speak, minimize the impact of the spending cuts in future budget cycles because they do not lower the baseline levels for discretionary programs such as space exploration or housing, whose funding levels are set by Congress each year.

<...>

Most of the federal budget is beyond the reach of the annual budget process. The size of benefit programs such as Social Security is determined by how many people qualify for them, not by how much money Congress sets aside for them.

Democrats pushed for cuts from mandatory programs, although they exempted the Big Three -- Social Security, the Medicare health plan for retirees, and the Medicaid plan for the poor.

The largest of the remaining entitlement programs: $4.9 billion from a Justice Department fund for crime victims; $400 million from a fund to seize assets from organized crime; and roughly $550 million from the SMART Grant student-aid program.

Republicans wanted most of the cuts to come from discretionary programs that Congress reviews annually, because that would set a lower baseline for spending in future years.

<...>


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-11 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
1. Kick!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whisp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-11 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
2. but I thought Obama sold out all our grandchildren's farms?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DevonRex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-11 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. I have grandchildren already?
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-11 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. only if they were mohair farms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tippy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-11 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
3. Republicansw are hell bent on destroying America as we know it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-11 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Well,
so much for facts.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nancy Waterman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-11 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
6. Thank you for posting this
It is much better than I had feared.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Logical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-11 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
8. Good article! n-t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-11 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
9. From Sanders facebook page, some other interesting details...
A last-minute deal was reached near midnight on Friday for $38.5 billion in spending cuts. Another stopgap spending measure will keep the government running until next week when Congress is to vote on the budget agreement. It makes steep cuts in programs for working families, such as Head Start for children and Pell grants for college student
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-11 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. According to this,
Head Start wasn't included:

<...>

In addition, money will not be taken from programs the president favors, such as Head Start, but instead from the automatic "mandatory spending" appropriated for departments such as the Pentagon and the Department of Transportation.

link



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
great white snark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-11 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
11. K&R
Thanks for the info ProSense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ReturnoftheDjedi Donating Member (839 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-11 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
12. as the smoke clears, more evidence of a Repuke defeat will appear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TBF Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-11 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. Just like magic.
Too bad we couldn't defeat the "repukes" when we needed to taxing millionaires/billionaires. But then it's not what democrats really want now is it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ramulux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-11 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
13. Holy shit that is pathetic
If that's the best these loser democrats can do to spin this as anything other than a huge loss, they are in serious trouble.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-11 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Holy shit!
Loser Democrats are losers, pathetic losers. No wonder they lose!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Union Scribe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-11 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #14
20. Pretty much, yeah.
Weak-kneed Dems need to be replaced. Weak-kneed Dems who capitulate then thank the other side for the beating not being worse deserve voters' ire, not re-election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-11 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #13
25. They??
revealing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-11 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
15. Wish it wasn't necessary to point this out yet again -
Edited on Sat Apr-09-11 04:52 PM by truedelphi
I am not sure exactly what the meaning of the statement below was:
"Most of the federal budget is beyond the reach of the annual budget process. The size of benefit programs such as Social Security is determined by how many people qualify for them, not by how much money Congress sets aside for them."
I am making my entry for purposes of total clarification:

Social Security is not distributed by the General Fund from which payments for most of our nation's operation originate.

It is a separate fund. It currently has 2.1 Trillion dollars (at least) as a surplus amount.



But I wanted to point out that Social Security is a program that is not taken from the General Fund of the Federal Government that pays for the other things like education and defense.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wysingm Donating Member (115 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-11 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
16. Pell Grants & Race to the Top restored
Edited on Sat Apr-09-11 05:40 PM by wysingm
Cuts to Pell Grants for college students from low-income families were restored, as were cuts to health research and Obama's "Race to the Top" initiative that provides grants to better-performing schools. Large cuts to foreign aid were tamed.

Some $18 billion of the spending cuts involve cuts to so-called mandatory programs whose budgets run largely on autopilot. To the dismay of budget purists, these cuts often involve phantom savings allowed under the decidedly arcane rules of congressional budgeting. They include mopping up $2.5 billion in unused money from federal highway programs and $5 billion in fudged savings from capping payments from a Justice Department trust fund for crime victims.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20110409/ap_on_re_us/us_spending_showdown">Link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-11 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #16
23. "Race to the top" is another fucked up program
they could cut that divisive turkey and it would bother me!

Pitting schools against one another competing with fucked up bogus "tests" that DON'T MEASURE critical thinking skills or any other measures of Learning is an ugly byproduct of the republicanization of the democrat "education" policies...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
labor4ever Donating Member (22 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-11 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
17. I will wait for the official bill to be published as these reports often turn out to be wrong
and misleading in what they leave out.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-11 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
18. Less pain as iffy spending cuts dot bipartisan budget pact

Less pain as iffy spending cuts dot bipartisan budget pact

Almost half of the budget cuts, some $18 billion, in the budget pact between President Barack Obama don’t involve cuts to agency operating accounts spending hawks like to target. They involve cuts to so-called mandatory programs whose budgets run mostly on autopilot. Such cuts officially “score” as savings that could be used to pay for spending elsewhere, but they often have little real impact in terms of cutting the deficit.

They include:

—$2.5 billion in leftover highway money unavailable under current budget caps.

—$500 million from reforms to the Pell Grant program.

—$3.5 billion in unused Children’s Health Insurance Program funds.

—$5 billion in “phantom” savings from capping payments from a Justice Department trust fund for crime victims. Under arcane budget rules, appropriators can claim year after year the full amount of money in the trust fund.

—$400 million in similar savings from capping a Treasury fund to help pay for the department’s crime-fighting efforts.

—$2.2 billion in cuts to subsidies for health care cooperatives.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-11 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
21. WH: Details of the Bipartisan Budget Deal

Details of the Bipartisan Budget Deal

Posted by Dan Pfeiffer

Last night, President Obama announced that the federal government will remain open for business because Americans from different beliefs came together, put politics aside, and met the expectations of the American people. Today, small businesses will no longer worry or have to wait on a loan to open or expand their business, families will receive the mortgages they applied for, and hundreds of thousands of government workers, including our brave men and women in uniform, will continue to receive paychecks on time.

This deal cuts spending by $78.5 billion from the President’s FY 2011 Budget request -- the largest annual spending cut in our history. These are real cuts that will save taxpayers money and have a real impact. Many will be painful, and are to programs that we support, but the fiscal situation is such that we have to act.

The two sides agreed to cut $13 billion from funding for programs at the Departments of Labor, Education, and Health and Human Services as well as over $1 billion in a cut across non-defense agencies, forcing everyone to tighten their belt. There will be reductions to housing assistance programs and some health care programs along with $8 billion in cuts to our budget for State and Foreign Operations. These significant cuts to the State Department and foreign assistance will mean we will not meet some of the ambitious goals set for the nation in the President’s Budget.

Our team also went after wasteful spending and earmarked, special interest programs including $630 million in earmarked transportation projects and at least $2.5 billion in transportation funding that is ready to be earmarked. We were able to cut $35 million by ending the Crop Insurance Good Performance Rebate, which gives successful farmers, who have no claims, a rebate for insurance premiums already subsidized by the federal government. In addition to these cuts, we were able to eliminate $30 million for a job training program that was narrowly targeted at certain student loan processors. We also looked to the Defense department for savings, and were able to identify $18 billion in cuts deemed unnecessary by the Pentagon. These types of cuts are what the American people expect out of their leaders in Washington.

Just as families across the nation do everyday, we had to make tough choices and begin to live within our means, but we also had clear lines that protected the investments we need to win the future.

We protected funding for critical programs that invest in science programs, our kids’ education, and critical health programs. We are maintaining current levels of Head Start enrollment, funding Race to the Top, including an early learning element, and have sufficient savings available to maintain the Pell Grant maximum award and the broad education reform agenda, including K-12 education. There is still robust investment to efficiently and effectively run Medicare and to implement the Affordable Care Act. Even though we will no longer double the funding of key research and development agencies, you will still see strong investments in National Institute of Standards and Technology, National Science Foundation and the Office of Science.

By insisting on these cuts, we were able to achieve savings and avoid most of the harmful proposals. We avoided deep cuts in international programs that, among other things, threaten our transition out of Iraq. We were able to avoid making than $500 million cut in lifesaving biomedical research at National Institutes of Health. We avoided terminating 60,000 children from the Head Start Program in September and fund student load to provide adequate services to student loan borrowers. We are able to implement financial reforms signed into law to prevent another financial crisis.

We also made sure this was a debate about spending cuts, not social issues or pursuing an ideological agenda that has nothing to do with our budget. We all understand that these are important issues that deserve discussion, just not during a debate about our budget and at a time when the American people expect more out of their government.

We were able to stop Republican efforts to defund the Affordable Care Act as well as Planned Parenthood and international family planning programs. They also wanted to limit funding for the establishment of the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and block the Environmental Protection Agency from enforcing clean air and water rules. While we made significant cuts, we just couldn’t afford to cut these important programs that are critical to our nation.

Last night was a perfect example of Democrats and Republicans coming together, working tirelessly to hammer out a deal and making the tough choices to live within our means. We all know that we face tough challenges ahead, from job creating and growing our economy, to educating our children and reducing our deficit, and we must continue to work together to achieve those goals and deliver for the American people.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine1967 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-11 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
22. KICK!!!!
Thanks for this ProSense.

I had to take a break from it all today, and this was a lovely post to come home too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-09-11 10:07 PM
Response to Original message
24. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC