Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Are there enough votes in the senate to pass a compromise bill WITH a PO?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
Writer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 07:25 PM
Original message
Are there enough votes in the senate to pass a compromise bill WITH a PO?
Just curious...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. Kill this bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurt_and_Hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. A Snowe-written triggered PO w/ Nelson-getting abortion language (?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Writer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Well... whatever it is, I'm wondering if there's enough votes in the senate to pass a
PO in a compromise bill?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clio the Leo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. I think Snowe would vote for a trigger...
.... if she could do it after Christmas (or are you talking about a conference bill?)

But Lieberman WONT vote for a trigger ..... unless it's on an alternating Tuesday .... I think.

HOWEVER .... theoretically, if you had something that Snowe would vote for, ..... oh, what's the other ones name .... Flake? The other Senator from Maine .... I'm drawing a blank ..... theoretically, if you had Snowe's vote you wouldn't need Lieberman's and if you had Flake's vote, you wouldn't need Nelson's.

hmm.......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalmuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yes, but we can't leave Snowe and Lieberman behind.
They are our most valuable assets! :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Writer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Do we need a supermajority? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rwheeler31 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
6. We still need 60 to get to the vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Writer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I don't think cloture should require 60 votes.
They might as well just vote on the bill in that case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
8. Here's what will pass:
1. Keep the status quo, but require EVERYONE to have mandatory insurance*.

*Unless you're old, then you go to Medicare;
or if you have pre-existing conditions that will cost a lot of money to cover.

If you aren't wanted by the insurance companies, you have Republicare, which means you go to the emergency room if you get really, really sick. But the best option is to not get sick. And if you do get sick, die quickly.

Sadly, that is what would pass with a wide majority.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laelth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
9. It doesn't matter. We need this bill to go down in flames.
The current system is unsustainable, and everyone knows it. Change will come, eventually, UNLESS we pass the disastrous bill that's currently on the table.

California will probably pass single-payer on its own in 2011. All they need is a Democratic Governor. The legislature has already passed the bill. Schwarzenegger vetoed it. Once California has single-payer, most (if not all) states will follow suit.

It's likely that if we pass a new law now, the new law will preempt single-payer, i.e. the Federal law will preempt state law and prevent states from enacting a single-payer system.

THIS is what the health insurance companies fear. THIS is what brought them to the bargaining table. THIS is why they are not fighting Obama's tepid reforms, and THIS is why it is extremely important that we do not pass any health insurance reform bill this year.

Let's not settle for a bail-out of the health insurance industry. Let's insist on the eradication of it. In all likelihood, California will lead the way in 2011 ... if we can just give them time.

Canada got its single-payer system one province at a time. That seems to be the way it will have to happen in the U.S.

:dem:

-Laelth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC