Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

RE: Bin Laden shooting v. trial. We had 10 YEARS to figure out how to handle him. . .

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
wndycty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-11 09:35 AM
Original message
RE: Bin Laden shooting v. trial. We had 10 YEARS to figure out how to handle him. . .
. . .it wasn't until we shot him did I hear all this concern about having a trial for him.

The deed was done and I am glad it was.

I see all this hand wringing about it and think to myself, we had 10 FUCKING YEARS to address this issue and no one offered up a policy/legal guidelines until after the fact. For those 10 years most of us thought shoot to kill was acceptable and were not told otherwise. Its a little too late don't you think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-11 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
1. Remember several years ago when we kept hearing...
...that coalition forces had killed a succession of #2 ranking men from Al Qaeda? No one seemed too concerned that they were not somehow captured and tried. PRobably because they, like ObL, were war casualties and not executions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrcheerful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-11 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
2. That would be true except for the fact that Chimpster had no intention of capturing OBL
so why would he bother to set anything up for when OBL was captured.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-11 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
3. For the first 7 of those 10 years
If you would have asked the questions everyone in the liberal media is now asking, you would have been asked why you hate America.

The whole narrative changes depending on which party is in the white house.

I would have been glad they got him whenever, but it's somehow more satisfying to see the desperation on the part of the cheney/bush gang, knowing that a Democrat did quietly and efficiently what they were unable to pull off despite all their big talk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-11 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
4. Yup
I wouldn't have cared if we had captured him alive (like Saddam Hussein) but I'm not upset that we killed him either. Going after Bin Laden IMHO was like going after Hitler or any other mass murderer- in a sovereign-not-exactly-friendly-country- to boot. People like OBL rarely ever allow them to be taken alive. We obviously will never know the precise facts of what happened during the raid itself but very few allowances probably could've been made by the Seals for an OBL surrender under the circumstances (without risking a standoff and possible hostile intervention by Pakistan) and that his death at our hands was going to be the most likely outcome IMHO. I don't subscribe to the idea that this was a plain and simple execution-style killing and tend to believe that, short of an outright declaration of surrender and quick ability to assess that he posed no threat (i.e. making sure he wasn't wearing an explosive vest or had concealed weapons), the Seals probably had no other reasonable choice but to kill him and get the hell out of there as fast as they could. I mean, police swat teams occasionally have to go in and try to apprehend dangerous suspects and sometimes those raids end the exact same way- with the perp dead.:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-11 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
5. bin Laden had a chance for a trial
He just needed to turn himself in
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-11 10:34 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. +1
Another important point to make. Anybody think that nearly 10 years is not enough time for OBL to have turned himself in and received due process?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoePhilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-11 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marlakay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-11 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
7. Its only because this was made so public
my husband said if it wasn't osama they found we would have heard nothing, nada...just another mission we don't hear about.

We only heard this from one side of the world to another to let all know Osama was dead. Obama was sending a loud message to the world not to screw with us.

I want to know if the people who are wanting him to have a trial think that every person killed in war should have a trial? Because we were at war with Osama
he declared war on us, admitted he was in charge of 9-11.

I know its a hard one, I hate war too, I want them all to stop.

Also those seals that killed him they had no idea if he had weapons on him, a button that would explode the building they were in, etc. Its easy to criticize but
a man like him could have had explosives easily nearby and they had no way of knowing while his people were firing at them if that was the case or not
and we also don't know what he said to them before they shot him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lamp_shade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-11 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
8. The pissers and moaners would be pissing and moaning either way.
NOTHING Obama does is acceptable. I ignore them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-11 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
9. unrec for "hand winging"
I'm sick to death of that term already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoePhilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-11 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Can we go with "pearl clutching"?
:hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
golfguru Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-11-11 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
12. OBL's son planning to Sue US Govt for
his father's burial at sea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC