The whole thing was recorded

[bigdarryl]

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1386662/Osama-Bin-Laden-Navy-Seal-helmet-cameras-reveal-details-raid-terror-leader.html

[The Backlash Cometh]

1. You should put more details. This should be on the greatest page, unless

the Dailymail is unreliable skank news.


Wife lunged forward at Navy Seals carrying weapons
Investigators believe she may have been 'pushed' from behind
Bin Laden shot first in the chest then in the head
Only one gunfight took place between soldiers and courier
U.S. officials begin interrogation of Bin Laden's wives


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1386662/Osama-Bin-Laden-Navy-Seal-helmet-cameras-reveal-details-raid-terror-leader.html#ixzz1MFIACy7O

[rug]

2. The ultimate dashboard cam.

[PatSeg]

3. Very well planned operation

"It is hoped that accurate details will finally dispel the mystery surrounding the raid which has sparked controversy and conspiracy theories."

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1386662/Osama-Bin-Laden-Navy-Seal-helmet-cameras-reveal-details-raid-terror-leader.html#ixzz1MFVGM0MW

Unfortunately "controversy and conspiracy theories" are inevitable, no matter what they release. We live in a conspiracy era.

[Fire1]

4. True but conspiracies have a way of bringing out alot that has

been swept under the rug.

[PatSeg]

5. I know

That is why I have often gotten sucked into some of them in the past. I'm trying very hard to stick to the facts and reasonable evidence. I suppose if we lived in a society where our leaders were honest and trustworthy, we'd be less inclined to feel compelled to always look under the rug.

[Enrique]

6. there was video of the Jessica Lynch raid

why would they video that raid, and not this one?

[vaberella]

7. You do know that the DailyMail is like EuroTrash tabloid shit, right?!

DM is not worth the time of day. They print lies and rumors and BS. If it's not about celebrities, then rest assured it's crap to make them appear legit.

[Very_Boring_Name]

9. So what was innaccurate in the article?

Or did you just come here to grace us with your presence while contributing absolutely nothing?

[Honeycombe8]

8. It has been reported that one or more of the Seals had a video cam in his headgear. That sounds

plausible and reasonable. Why wouldn't they?

But I expect that it didn't catch everything. It caught only whatever the helmet wearer was looking at, at any given moment.

I'd guess that maybe ALL the Seals had head cams, and that most of the raid was caught on film, and particularly the shooting of OBL. But who knows for sure? I would bet a golden treasure that at least two of the Seals were wearing head cams, though. It just makes sense. (And of course, we know that the the Prez, VP, & others were watching the video of the raid.)

(edited for spelling correction...darn my memory! I sometimes forget how to spell the simplest or wards!)