yellowcanine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-16-11 12:23 PM
Original message |
From everything I have read, it appears Bachman was the "big winner" of the debate. |
|
This should boost her chances in Iowa and I would guess that this is bad news for both Pawlenty and Romney. Who is hurt the most with a less than stellar showing in Iowa?
My guess is Romney as the front runner.
|
Crazy Dave
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-16-11 12:27 PM
Response to Original message |
1. I'm not worried about Romney or Gingrich |
|
I see them fading out fast in the primaries. Bachman with the backing and blessings of the Tea Party will start another movement like the recent mid-terms except worse.
|
Tempest
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-16-11 12:28 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Being considered a big winner in that debate is like... |
|
Being crowned Miss Bodunk U.S.A.
It'll make the 20 people in your town happy, but no one else noticed.
|
dixiegrrrrl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-16-11 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
I could not believe the overwhelming stupidity of that debate. Jon Stewart did a an excellent job of pointing it out, btw.
It was SO evident that CNN was basically putting out a version of Who's Got No Talent?
Anyone above a 5th grade education should have been appalled at the entire affair.
|
and-justice-for-all
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jun-16-11 02:30 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Not a single one of those clowns has a chance... |
|
I look forward to Obama beating the shit out of anyone of them on the national telly for all of our amusement.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Apr 30th 2024, 03:10 AM
Response to Original message |