|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
Divine Discontent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-14-11 07:36 PM Original message |
BREAKING: DOJ seeks emergency stop to DADT injunction as Pentagon finalizes repeal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vanje (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-14-11 07:40 PM Response to Original message |
1. Why would Obama's Justice Dept do this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-14-11 07:41 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Deleted message |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-14-11 07:49 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. Deleted message |
Divine Discontent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-14-11 07:50 PM Response to Reply #2 |
6. some in society don't want anyone to see things like this... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truth2power (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-14-11 08:34 PM Response to Reply #1 |
19. I asked that question in another thread. Obama allegedly signed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tx4obama (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-14-11 08:52 PM Response to Reply #19 |
25. The DOJ is fighting against the 9th Circuit Court's order because... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-14-11 09:52 PM Response to Reply #25 |
26. Wrong. The best way is to have it killed by the Courts, Congress and the Executive |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truth2power (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-14-11 11:12 PM Response to Reply #25 |
35. Well, that's the problem..the implementation process. I'm going to take a wild guess |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tx4obama (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-14-11 11:26 PM Response to Reply #35 |
38. Well, then your guess would probably be wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MNBrewer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-15-11 07:04 AM Response to Reply #38 |
50. Can we quote you on that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pab Sungenis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-15-11 07:29 AM Response to Reply #38 |
54. "Within weeks." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tx4obama (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-15-11 04:43 PM Response to Reply #54 |
65. No, that is incorrect. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pab Sungenis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-16-11 12:17 AM Response to Reply #65 |
67. We'll see. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-15-11 09:16 AM Response to Reply #25 |
58. Deleted message |
treestar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-16-11 10:07 AM Response to Reply #1 |
70. Some complicated legal mess |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tishaLA (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-14-11 07:47 PM Response to Original message |
3. just dumb nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluenorthwest (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-14-11 07:48 PM Response to Original message |
4. Typical of them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-14-11 07:51 PM Response to Original message |
7. I can't wait for the explanation of this 8-dimensional chess rope a jitsu. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-14-11 08:07 PM Response to Reply #7 |
12. Deleted message |
vaberella (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-14-11 08:36 PM Response to Reply #12 |
21. You speak as though DADT is not going to be repealed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
villager (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-14-11 08:49 PM Response to Reply #21 |
24. well, better misplaced rage than misplaced complacency, in times such as these |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pab Sungenis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-15-11 07:31 AM Response to Reply #21 |
55. The repeal is NOT in effect. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vaberella (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-14-11 08:35 PM Response to Reply #7 |
20. Get over yourself. There is nothing about chess. It seems to be about upholding the repeal contract. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-14-11 11:19 PM Response to Reply #20 |
37. The DOJ could simply not do ANYTHING. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-14-11 08:00 PM Response to Original message |
8. K&R'd. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1776Forever (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-14-11 08:01 PM Response to Original message |
9. Very sad to see this being done and yet the Wall Street Gangs run freeeeeeee - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Divine Discontent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-14-11 08:01 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. ugh.. wall street. just hearing about them makes me sick. they got away with billions and laugh! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chill_wind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-14-11 08:32 PM Response to Reply #9 |
16. And Yoo and Rumsfeld and BushCo et al. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Proud Liberal Dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-14-11 08:07 PM Response to Original message |
11. I don't get it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benld74 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-14-11 08:17 PM Response to Original message |
13. WHy? SOmeone please explain this to me,,,, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheKentuckian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-14-11 08:32 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. There is probably a meeting right now to decide if the super honorable letter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vaberella (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-14-11 08:34 PM Response to Reply #15 |
18. See post. # 17. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vaberella (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-14-11 08:33 PM Response to Reply #13 |
17. See post. # 14. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vaberella (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-14-11 08:31 PM Response to Original message |
14. They made a deal that said they'd have to wait for the year. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vanje (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-14-11 08:44 PM Response to Reply #14 |
22. Apparently the Ninth Circuit Court does'nt agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tx4obama (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-14-11 08:47 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. The 9th Circuit Court's orders are not very permanent. Laws/repeals that Congress passes are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-14-11 10:03 PM Response to Reply #23 |
28. No, it isn't the truth |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-14-11 10:40 PM Response to Reply #28 |
31. Assuming the Supreme Court agrees with the 9th circuit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-14-11 10:49 PM Response to Reply #31 |
32. they didn't appeal to the USSC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Divine Discontent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-14-11 11:49 PM Response to Reply #28 |
39. thank you for a perfect explanation of why it is offensive, and harmful to servicemembers. some may |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-15-11 12:28 AM Response to Reply #39 |
44. thanks for the OP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lyric (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-15-11 07:53 AM Response to Reply #23 |
57. Actually it's the exact opposite. Court rulings are far more permanent than Congressional laws. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vanje (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-15-11 10:42 AM Response to Reply #57 |
61. Yes. yes. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-15-11 09:18 AM Response to Reply #23 |
59. Deleted message |
truth2power (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-14-11 11:15 PM Response to Reply #14 |
36. I'm totally confused. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ignis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-15-11 12:30 PM Response to Reply #14 |
63. "This is not something to get upset over ..." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fearless (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-14-11 09:58 PM Response to Original message |
27. What a f*cking surprise. For as much changes so much stays the same. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mitchtv (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-14-11 10:07 PM Response to Original message |
29. He never really loved us |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-14-11 10:35 PM Response to Original message |
30. Deleted message |
Tx4obama (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-14-11 11:57 PM Response to Reply #30 |
40. Obama is not lying. He is following the Repeal of DADT law stipulatoins that Congress passed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-15-11 12:05 AM Response to Reply #40 |
41. Where in the DADT repeal statute |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tx4obama (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-15-11 12:10 AM Response to Reply #41 |
42. I was replying to the other fellow that stated that Obama was lying. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-15-11 12:22 AM Response to Reply #42 |
43. Obama has no legal obligation to have DOJ file a motion that declares DADT "constitutional" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tx4obama (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-15-11 12:39 AM Response to Reply #43 |
46. Are you just assuming that Obama told the DOJ to file the motion or do you have a link? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-15-11 01:10 AM Response to Reply #46 |
47. Since Obama had the DOJ re-engineer the brief on the Smelt suit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boxman15 (389 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-14-11 10:57 PM Response to Original message |
33. Let's clear some things up: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ruggerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Jul-14-11 11:11 PM Response to Reply #33 |
34. Did you read the motion? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tx4obama (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-15-11 12:31 AM Response to Original message |
45. Here's a link to another article that explains the DOJ position in a bit more detail |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vaberella (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-15-11 07:08 AM Response to Reply #45 |
52. Please give it's individual post... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zorra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-15-11 02:19 PM Response to Reply #45 |
64. But...but...my dog ate my homework. Really. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blkmusclmachine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-15-11 01:45 AM Response to Original message |
48. Another Eleventy-Quatrillion Chess Move |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
terrya (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-15-11 06:53 AM Response to Original message |
49. I don't know if DADT repeal will ever happen. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
vaberella (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-15-11 07:05 AM Response to Reply #49 |
51. Do you not remember what was signed? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pab Sungenis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-15-11 07:37 AM Response to Reply #51 |
56. The 1-year study is over. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tx4obama (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-15-11 04:50 PM Response to Reply #49 |
66. The 60 day clock starts 'after' the 'certification' is signed. Obama signed the 'bill' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pab Sungenis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-15-11 07:25 AM Response to Original message |
53. "Fierce advocate" my ASS! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-15-11 09:29 AM Response to Original message |
60. I don't understand why they don't just let it go. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueIris (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Jul-15-11 12:22 PM Response to Original message |
62. Pathetic. Awful move. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-16-11 01:11 AM Response to Original message |
68. FIERCE! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Divine Discontent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-16-11 01:27 AM Response to Reply #68 |
69. well, that's one word for it, BB. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
QC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jul-16-11 03:43 PM Response to Reply #69 |
71. There are many others, but they must not be said. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 07:59 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC