Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Yes or no: Will Obama sign legislation cutting Social Security and/or Medicaid & Medicare?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 12:06 PM
Original message
Yes or no: Will Obama sign legislation cutting Social Security and/or Medicaid & Medicare?
(Raising the retirement the age for Social Security or Medicare = cutting benefits, as does instituting a chained CPI to calculate COLA).

I say: Yes, Obama will sign legislation cutting benefits for at least one of the three programs before this term is up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
vi5 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yes. It's not even a question.
It may not be with this debt ceiling fight, but he will do it. He keeps coming back to it more than anyone else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Big Blue Marble Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yes, he wants to cut these programs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roxiejules Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
17. Yes, Third Way supports the cuts
Third Way Press Room release:


“Third Way has long argued that entitlement reform should be part of the solution to America’s deficit challenge. Not only will it put us back on a sustainable fiscal path, reform will save and strengthen our social safety net. We applaud the President’s willingness to do the right thing and lay hands on the “third rail” of American politics.

Some on the left will attack the President for putting Social Security and Medicare fixes on the table, but without action these programs will eventually crowd out our ability to invest in America’s future and force us to default on our promise to provide for tomorrow’s seniors. Postponing reform indefinitely is not an option, and to delay is not progressive."





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boxman15 Donating Member (389 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. No.
Edited on Fri Jul-29-11 12:10 PM by boxman15
This debt ceiling debate is going to end with one of these outcomes:

1. The Reid plan gets passed (which contains no cuts to any entitlements, but unfortunately no revenue)
2. A clean debt ceiling vote, which obviously has no cuts.
3. Obama invoking the 14th Amendment, which would require no cuts.

It's not going to happen here. I don't think he will by the end of his first term either, if only because it's bad politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
4. He at this point wants to
Sad to say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
5. He's already agreed to some "adjustments", so if that's included
in the bill that he's presented, I think he will. Sadly. :(

If the Reid bill is what is offered, then it's my hope with the nasty taste the Baggers have left in America's mouth, when we next pick up the budget discussions (wars), we could be stronger and less "bi-partisan" since we wouldn't have a deadline breathing down our necks.

I'm not one of the ones who believes Obama "wants" to do this. I think he feels he needed to "compromise". I don't agree with his decision, just an objective observation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueCaliDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
6. No. It would end his presidency and the careers of Democrats. He's
not stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
7. 4 yes and 2 no
Edited on Fri Jul-29-11 12:13 PM by liberal N proud
Who knows but I would worry,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Autumn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
8. I say: Yes, that is what he wants
I can't see why, but it seems to be important to him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Run With The Roses Donating Member (2 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
9. I hope not. I don't think he wants to, either.
I am still hoping for a clan vote to raise the ceiling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
graywarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
10. No
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marrah_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
11. Sure he would- without blinking an eye
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Morizovich Donating Member (196 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
12. I hope not
But I'm not wagering!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
13. Yes Michelle is tired of being first lady and he want to go home nt
Edited on Fri Jul-29-11 12:27 PM by daa
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarheel_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
14. Unrec
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
and-justice-for-all Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
15. I dont think that is the plan at all...
I am more optimistic, I think that he is trying to hang repukes with their own rope.

I am anticipating the 14th Amendment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Howler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
16. Yep.
We have been had!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crazylikafox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
18. Absofunkinglutely
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
styersc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
19. Yes Absolutely!!!! May be his birthday present. to himself.
Take advantage of every opportunity to "punch a hippy" and make buddies in the GOP!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
COLGATE4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
20. Yep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoePhilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
21. Oh yea ... any second ... he and Boehner made the deal on the golf course ...
After all ... Obama is hell bent on dismantling these programs.

Yup ... any second ... tick, tick, tick .... :nuke:


Kind of like when he was absolutely, positively going to kill those plans during the state of the union (and every month since).

.... tick tick tick ... :nuke:

Ok, didn't happen .... but THIS time is THE time.

But wait!! ... OH NO ... the GOP seems unwilling to help him kill these programs, something they wanted for decades. They hate him too much to help him do it.

bummer ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HankyDubs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-11 05:45 AM
Response to Reply #21
42. quick lesson for you, Joe
Edited on Sat Jul-30-11 05:47 AM by HankyDubs
The state of the union isn't a piece of legislation.

Would he sign a piece of legislation that did cut SS and medicare? You better fucking believe it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vroomvroom Donating Member (496 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
22. YES! ... Anyone paying attention for the last 3 years knows this president well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shanti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
23. yes, i believe he will n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vroomvroom Donating Member (496 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
24. 17 YES / 4 NO
Edited on Fri Jul-29-11 02:43 PM by vroomvroom
I did not include "hope not" because they did not give a definitive yes or no
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoePhilly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. you might want to read the posts, not just the subject lines when you count.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dana_b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
25. Yes. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
golfguru Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
26. Yes, but not because he wants to
but because he has little choice since US is borrowing 42 cents for every dollar spent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jakes Progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
27. Whatever happens SS will be adversely affected.
And there will be some weasel word way out.

Politicians may not be able to run a country, but they are adept at having it both ways.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
a simple pattern Donating Member (426 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
29. Yes, he will.
He didn't put that Catfood Commission together for nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #29
37. Yup and after the TeaPubliKlan sponsors fell off too boot.
It is borderline delusional to think he is against cuts here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thelordofhell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
30. No
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthCarolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
31. If either, or all, pass Congress and are laid before him; he will sign.
Edited on Fri Jul-29-11 03:33 PM by NorthCarolina
He may opt to use the autopen though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blkmusclmachine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
32. Yes. Yes. And yes. It's what he's always wanted. He'll get his way.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
33. Yes. I said it during the campaign, and I'll keep saying it...
He's a centrist, NOT a progressive!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-11 06:02 AM
Response to Reply #33
44. If he was a centrist he would
Edited on Sat Jul-30-11 06:03 AM by Enthusiast
be actively engaged in preserving these programs. It is very clear that the American people by a HUGE margin favor raising taxes to preserve these programs. THIS is your 'center', not some imaginary center we see propped up by media lies.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
34. Not on its own
And cutting in what way?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
35. Hell yes, so fast it will make your head spin.
There's never been any doubt about that.

Bake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
36. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
38. Of course he will
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lucca18 Donating Member (149 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
39. I sadly say yes.
But I still can not understand why. I just don't get it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newportdadde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-29-11 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
40. Yes, under the 'had no other choice' line.
It will be phased in so the boomers won't revolt that is key.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Roses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-11 04:42 AM
Response to Original message
41. No
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-11 05:55 AM
Response to Original message
43. Yes.
Obama wouldn't be actively pursuing additional payroll holidays if he wanted to preserve these programs. Obama also created the deficit commission and headed it with anti-New Deal zealots. No one forced Obama to take these actions, he did this on his own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Puglover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-11 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
45. He can't seem to open his mouth
Edited on Sat Jul-30-11 08:14 AM by Puglover
without the words "entitlement reform" lately. So I would suspect so. I certainly hope not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Creideiki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-30-11 08:12 AM
Response to Original message
46. Yes, but we'll be told here that he didn't.
These are all things that Obama not only is willing to negotiate, but wants. Then again, Sasha and Malia won't get hurt. They're going to inherit right into the top .5% of the country and live a life of unexamined privilege. Obama *should* know better, but now that he is in the privileged class, he seems unable to remember what it would be like for those of us not in that class.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC