Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

President Obama Announces First Ever Fuel Economy Standards for Commercial Vehicles

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 01:52 PM
Original message
President Obama Announces First Ever Fuel Economy Standards for Commercial Vehicles

President Obama Announces First Ever Fuel Economy Standards for Commercial Vehicles

Posted by Colleen Curtis

President Obama today will announce new fuel efficiency standards that will save American businesses that operate and own commercial vehicles approximately $50 billion in fuel costs over the life of the program. These work trucks, buses, and other medium- and heavy duty vehicleswill be required to meet fuel efficiency and greenhouse gas emission standards for the first time ever beginning in 2014.

The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) developed the standards in close coordination with the companies that met with the President today as well as other stakeholders, following requests from companies to develop this program.

“While we were working to improve the efficiency of cars and light-duty trucks, something interesting happened,” said President Obama. “We started getting letters asking that we do the same for medium and heavy-duty trucks. They were from the people who build, buy, and drive these trucks. And today, I’m proud to have the support of these companies as we announce the first-ever national policy to increase fuel efficiency and decrease greenhouse gas pollution from medium-and heavy-duty trucks.”

Under the comprehensive new national program, trucks and buses built in 2014 through 2018 will reduce oil consumption by a projected 530 million barrels and greenhouse gas (GHG) pollution by approximately 270 million metric tons. Like the Administration’s historic car standards, this program – which relies heavily on off-the-shelf technologies – was developed in coordination with truck and engine manufacturers, fleet owners, the State of California, environmental groups and other stakeholders.

The joint DOT/EPA program will include a range of targets which are specific to the vehicle types and purposes. Vehicles are divided into three major categories: combination tractors (semi-trucks), heavy-duty pickup trucks and vans, and vocational vehicles (like transit buses and refuse trucks). Within each of those categories, even more specific targets are laid out based on the design and purpose of the vehicle. This flexible structure allows serious but achievable fuel efficiency improvement goals charted for each year and for each vehicle category and type.

The standards are expected to result in significant long-terms savings for vehicle owners and operators. A semi-truck operator could pay for the technology upgrades in under a year and realize net savings of $73,000 through reduced fuel costs over the truck’s useful life. These cost saving standards will also reduce emissions of harmful air pollutants that can lead to asthma, heart attacks and premature death.

Beyond the direct benefits to businesses that own and operate these vehicles, the program will also benefit consumers and businesses by reducing costs for transporting goods, and spur growth in the clean energy sector by fostering innovative technologies and providing regulatory certainty for manufacturers.

Read more about the new standards on EPA’s web site and on NHTSA’s web site

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good news!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Yes, it is. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. "This program responds to President Obama’s 2010 request..."
Edited on Tue Aug-09-11 02:08 PM by Robb
"This program responds to President Obama’s 2010 request to jointly establish greenhouse gas emissions and fuel efficiency standards for the medium- and heavy-duty highway vehicle sector."


See related story, May 2010:http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x4393070">Obama seeks fuel efficiency standards for large trucks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
canoeist52 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. Good news, but how did Obama get them to do that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Pelosi and Reid negotiated the law with Bush
Edited on Tue Aug-09-11 02:16 PM by Enrique
there were compromises, and DU didn't like it:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x2938083#2938634

edit with my favorite:

17. How much money did Pelosi get from the Big Three?
She blocks impeachment, and now she blocks an extremely modest CAFE standard.

How is Pelosi different from the GOP when it comes to climate crisis?

Can't we get a Democrat to challenge her in the primary next year?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Eh, I believe that was an automobile standard, this is big rigs. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. same law, the 2007 energy bill
this article has a lot more about the compromises involved in getting it passed:

http://www.landlinemag.com/todays_news/Daily/2007/Dec07/121707/121907-01.htm


A federal energy bill that President Bush has signed into law includes a fuel mileage study for heavy trucks, increased mileage standards for passenger vehicles, and a mandate for increased use of renewable fuels such as ethanol and biodiesel.

(...)

Heavy trucks do not currently have a mileage standard, but the energy act directs the National Academy of Sciences to study and develop fuel mileage standards for heavy trucks. The government could require efficiency improvements once a benchmark is determined.

(...)

“While we are proud that this bill raises fuel-efficiency standards for the first time in a generation, we will not be satisfied until Republicans fully join us to put consumers’ interests ahead of Big Oil’s greed. By blocking tax incentives in renewable energy and standards to supply clean, renewable electricity, Republicans missed a chance to grow our new clean energy industries and build new-century jobs.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. ...which didn't have a standard for heavy trucks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. but it authorized the standards
i'm answering the question, "how did he get them to do that?" The answer is in the long path of the 2007 energy bill becoming law, and it involved compromises by the Democrats:

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/10/science/earth/10truck.html

(...)

The rules are allowed under a law signed by President George W. Bush in 2007, but it has taken until now to devise the program. And President Obama, speaking at a time when there is substantial opposition to new environmental rules, said in a statement that the vehicle owners wanted their trucks to be regulated.

(...)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Well.
"Heavy trucks do not currently have a mileage standard, but the energy act directs the National Academy of Sciences to study and develop fuel mileage standards for heavy trucks. The government could require efficiency improvements once a benchmark is determined."

...it's a good thing Democrats won Congressional majorities in 2006. Bush clearly wasn't interested in moving forward in any serious way. Now President Obama took the initiative to create the first-ever standards for heavy trucks and a progressive standard for cars.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Bush tried to
undercut the rule and California opposed. The courts rejected his proposal as too lax.

Also, Markey proposed "35 miles per gallon by 2019" for cars. The admin issued fuel efficiency standards to 54.5 mpg by 2025.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. that looks good
i'll have to read about that. Can't argue with 54.5 mpg. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawgs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-09-11 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
13. Great news!!
:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC