Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama Picks New Chief Economist

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-11 06:29 AM
Original message
Obama Picks New Chief Economist
Obama Picks New Chief Economist

President Obama plans to nominate Princeton University's Alan Krueger to be chairman of the White House Council of Economic Advisers, the Wall Street Journal reports.

"If confirmed by the Senate, Mr. Krueger, a labor economist, is likely to provide a voice inside the administration for more-aggressive government action to bring down unemployment and, particularly, to address long-term joblessness."

"Mr. Krueger, 50 years old, returned to Princeton a year ago after serving as assistant Treasury secretary for economic policy during the first two years of the Obama administration -- which means he has recently cleared the sometimes treacherous Senate confirmation process."

http://politicalwire.com/archives/2011/08/29/obama_picks_new_chief_economist.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Pab Sungenis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-11 06:51 AM
Response to Original message
1. What do we know about his policies?
Is he another supply-side neoliberal or does he know how things actually work?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-11 08:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. This is a man who figures out how things actually work !
David Card and Alan B. Krueger have already made national news with their pathbreaking research on the minimum wage. Here they present a powerful new challenge to the conventional view that higher minimum wages reduce jobs for low-wage workers. In a work that has important implications for public policy as well as for the direction of economic research, the authors put standard economic theory to the test, using data from a series of recent episodes, including the 1992 increase in New Jersey's minimum wage, the 1988 rise in California's minimum wage, and the 1990-91 increases in the federal minimum wage. In each case they present a battery of evidence showing that increases in the minimum wage lead to increases in pay, but no loss in jobs.

A distinctive feature of Card and Krueger's research is the use of empirical methods borrowed from the natural sciences, including comparisons between the "treatment" and "control" groups formed when the minimum wage rises for some workers but not for others. In addition, the authors critically reexamine the previous literature on the minimum wage and find that it, too, lacks support for the claim that a higher minimum wage cuts jobs. Finally, the effects of the minimum wage on family earnings, poverty outcomes, and the stock market valuation of low-wage employers are documented. Overall, this book calls into question the standard model of the labor market that has dominated economists' thinking on the minimum wage. In addition, it will shift the terms of the debate on the minimum wage in Washington and in state legislatures throughout the country.

http://press.princeton.edu/titles/5632.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pab Sungenis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-11 08:41 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Good!
Maybe the "feet to the fire" strategy is having some good effect. And maybe we'll finally get this economy turned around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
comtec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-11 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. Perhaps in his second term obama will grow a pair, and realize he DOES NOT have to play ball
and can start acting like a leader.... FINALLY!

One can only hope that his second term will be RADICALLY (and liberally) different from his first anemic term.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-11 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. Jared Bernstein thinks Krueger is an 'excellent choice'
White House Makes Great Choice for CEA Head

Aug 30, 2011

Alan Krueger is an excellent choice to head the President’s Council of Economic Advisors.

He’s an expert on job markets and he has an excellent, empiricist’s understanding of what measures could move the needle on unemployment. It’s actually unusual for a labor economist to head the CEA but with unemployment stuck around 9%, it’s an inspired choice.

Alan’s work has often focused on a theme I’ve tried to stress here: that it’s a mistake to form your beliefs on the impact of policies on economic theory alone (Alan would correctly say that my emphasis is “endogenous”–it relies on his work!). The theory is often misrepresented by partisans/advocates who use research the way a drunk uses a streetlight—more for support than illumination (Krugman was the first person I heard use that line, btw…). Or, it’s too simplistic to describe how complex creatures like the job market actually works…or, lately, doesn’t work.

Obviously, the larger question here is how hard policy makers will push for the implementation of solid ideas that could help get people back to work, and how far those ideas will get in air fractious political airspace. But that’s going to be less Alan’s bailiwick—I guarantee you he will be generating those ideas.

http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/white-house-makes-great-choice-for-cea-head/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vroomvroom Donating Member (496 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-11 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
4. Is Obama Drunk? Krueger didn't have a hand in the economic collapse so why pick him?
Let's face it, Obama's cabinet is loaded with whos-who that started the economic collapse and who love Wall Street. Obama has been doing this consistently. So my guess is he is picking Kruger for campaign reasons..to appeal to his base during the 2012 run expecting full well that the senate wont confirm him because Kruger reads like a blank sheet who doesnt seem to be tainted and corrupted to Congress's nor Obama's likings.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blkmusclmachine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-11 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
5. Another stooge, would be my guess.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-11 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. The WSJ article link suggests otherwise.
If confirmed by the Senate, Mr. Krueger, a labor economist, is likely to provide a voice inside the administration for more-aggressive government action to bring down unemployment and, particularly, to address long-term joblessness.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424053111903352704576536811283720734.html%253fmod=WSJ_WSJ_US_News_5
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-11 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Uninformed response that reflects poorly on you n/t
Edited on Mon Aug-29-11 11:32 AM by scheming daemons
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawgs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-11 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. That's why their OPINION is a GUESS. History will judge if it reflects poorly. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-11 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
8. I think Krueger is an excellent pick. Why he'd want the job I don't know,
but I'm glad he's going to do it. A pro-labor thinking man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CakeGrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-11 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. If no one wanted the job, who would help fix the economy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-29-11 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. That's true! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 05:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC