Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Can someone tell me about Frank-Dodd?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
themaguffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-11 09:29 AM
Original message
Can someone tell me about Frank-Dodd?
Edited on Thu Oct-20-11 09:30 AM by themaguffin
I hadn't followed that closely and it seems to be a go to law for wingnuts to bitch about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
frazzled Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-11 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. Well, first, it's called Dodd-Frank
That's important if you want to google it, which you can do here and read any number of articles and "cheat sheets" about it, including the bill itself

http://www.google.com/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=dodd+frank+bill&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DebJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-11 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
2. I believe Dodd-Frank, for one, is why BOA did that $5 mo fee
thing. To me, this is great: transparency causing consumers to shift away from the greed which now must be more blatant and open.

To a RW person that I know, BOA was 'deprived' of revenues by Dodd-Frank and so is only, 'naturally', trying to 'recover its losses' BARF>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyRingo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-11 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
3. Here's a great article from Rolling Stone by Matt Taibbi:
Edited on Thu Oct-20-11 10:47 AM by JohnnyRingo
This is the most in-depth analysis I've seen yet. Taibbi remains non-partisan and pulls no punches, as usual, and lands several unflattering blows to Chris Dodd who he describes as Wall Street's Democratic sweetheart. He makes it sound like Dodd inserted himself in the works to make sure Obama didn't cripple the barons of money.

Plus, he uses language that suits the typical man on the street who may not have a PHD in economics:

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/wall-streets-big-win-20100804

By Matt Taibbi
August 4, 2010 1:00 PM ET

Cue the credits: the era of financial thuggery is officially over. Three hellish years of panic, all done and gone – the mass bankruptcies, midnight bailouts, shotgun mergers of dying megabanks, high-stakes SEC investigations, all capped by a legislative orgy in which industry lobbyists hurled more than $600 million at Congress. It all supposedly came to an end one Wednesday morning a few weeks back, when President Obama, flanked by hundreds of party flacks and congressional bigwigs, stepped up to the lectern at an extravagant ceremony to sign into law his sweeping new bill to clean up Wall Street.

Obama's speech introducing the massive law brimmed with celebratory finality. He threw around lofty phrases like "never again" and "no more." He proclaimed the end of unfair credit-card-rate hikes and issued a fatwa on abusive mortgage practices and the shady loans that helped fuel the debt bubble. The message was clear: The sheriff was padlocking the Wall Street casino, and the government was taking decisive steps to unfuck our hopelessly broken economy.

But is the nightmare really over, or is this just another Inception-style trick ending? It's hard to figure, given all the absurd rhetoric emanating from the leadership of both parties. Obama and the Democrats boasted that the bill is the "toughest financial reform since the ones we created in the aftermath of the Great Depression" – a claim that would maybe be more impressive if Congress had passed any financial reforms since the Great Depression, or at least any that didn't specifically involve radically undoing the Depression-era laws.

The Republicans, meanwhile, were predictably hysterical. They described the new law – officially known as the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act – as something not far from a full-blown Marxist seizure of the means of production. House ­Minority Leader John Boehner shrieked that it was like "killing an ant with a nuclear weapon," apparently forgetting that the ant crisis in question wiped out about 40 percent of the world's wealth in a little over a year, making its smallness highly debatable.

But Dodd-Frank was neither an FDR-style, paradigm-shifting reform, nor a historic assault on free enterprise. What it was, ultimately, was a cop-out, a Band-Aid on a severed artery. If it marks the end of anything at all, it represents the end of the best opportunity we had to do something real about the criminal hijacking of America's financial-services industry. During the yearlong legislative battle that forged this bill, Congress took a long, hard look at the shape of the modern American economy – and then decided that it didn't have the stones to wipe out our country's one ­dependably thriving profit center: theft.

continued at above link.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
themaguffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-11 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
4. thank you all for the replies and info!
much appreciated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 01:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC