Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What should Obama have tackled during his first year INSTEAD of the health insurance debacle?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-27-09 11:07 AM
Original message
Poll question: What should Obama have tackled during his first year INSTEAD of the health insurance debacle?
Edited on Sun Dec-27-09 11:19 AM by derby378
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-27-09 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
1. It wasn't a debacle
It's wasn't perfect but they FINALLY got something passed. The energy level (read: MONEY) on the other side has to maintain itself as this is administered over the years.

It took 65 years to finally get anything like this to a vote. AND. WE. WON.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Heidi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-27-09 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
2. Not to be persnickety, but that's HUMAN RIGHTS including DADT and marriage. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-27-09 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
16. Understood
Since I was including the abuses in Darfur and Congo, I had to draw a line of demarcation. But I see where you're coming from. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-27-09 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
3. Climate Change.
Ah well, maybe folks will figure it out in a few years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-27-09 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. Duly noted - fixed the poll (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EndElectoral Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-27-09 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
4. He needed to actually tackle the health care debate, not an insurance simulus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-27-09 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
5. Employee Free Choice Act n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-27-09 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
6. What a lovely push poll you've posted.
:eyes:

I hear Rasmussen is hiring.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
timeforpeace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-27-09 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
8. By dividing up so many non-healthcare items, you guarantee that health care wins. Nice job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-27-09 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
9. Except for gay rights
He's actually tackling most of that. Everything isn't finished yet, and only an infantile 2 year old would have expected it to be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-27-09 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. The operative phrase here is "political capital"
We all remember when Bush pulled that line in 2005, but the schmuck was filled with hubris and pumped up by a Congress that had been cowed into inaction, even after Democrats took over in 2006.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-27-09 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. He has a ton of political capital
For 8 years this board complained about the way the media went after Clinton and then Gore.

Well the media is at it again - and the same dumb motherfuckers who bought it in the 90s are buying it now. That's all.

The majority of people are very happy with Obama and see the changes he is making, and the ones he is working on. He's going to be just fine and has gotten more accomplished in one month this year than most politicians accomplish in a lifetime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Overseas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-27-09 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
11. I've always felt the War Crimes Trials would have made it very clear
Edited on Sun Dec-27-09 12:06 PM by Overseas
that very significant change was required.

When we saw, through 21st Century Nuremberg Trials, how low the Bush Gang had taken our country, we would know how deeply we needed to change our modus operandi. After we had all watched and affirmed that the government appointed by The Supreme Court in 2000 had gone on to commit serious war crimes in our names, with photographic and personal testimony, for weeks and weeks-- then we might be ready for real change.

We wouldn't want to prop up business as usual and pretend that we could overcome torture committed in our name with platitudes like "we're looking forward, not backward."

The war crimes trials would set the context into which President Obama's administration was beginning. They would demonstrate one area where serious thorough change was required, and where very serious covenants with the world like the Geneva Conventions (that protect our soldiers too) were violated.

The trials would help us become better accustomed to facing the truth. Business as usual has been very cruel toward the majority of our people economically and caused a lot of collateral damage (aka murder of civilians by accident) overseas.

After seeing all of that again, we might understand how significant our change needs to be. No simple declarations on future policy interests would suffice. We signed the Geneva Conventions that said no excuses for torture would be allowed. Whatever happened to that?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-27-09 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
13. Other: Health CARE, not insurance. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-27-09 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
14. Bank reform
Just because maybe we could have struck while the iron was hot and actually got something of impact done. The fierce urgency of now may have actually yielded substance and actual long term benefits to the people.

This one feels like a prime example of the further we get from the crisis the less crucial it "feels" to about everyone. The fundamentals of the economy are also probably the biggest short and medium term issue and the one we can most unilaterally affect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-27-09 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
15. Trade policy and tax incentives for domestic hiring.
These two things could have drastically improved our employment situation.

Health care reform is important, but jobs are the #1 issue now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion: Presidency Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC