Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What killed American Union's power?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 03:14 PM
Original message
What killed American Union's power?
Back at the turn of the century, American Unions were the model for most of Europe's Unions

We had organized, IWW had tremendous power, and Eugene Debs' popularity was growing

Then comes WWII, and it seems as if after the war, the power of unions had already crested and was pulling back

Fast forward to the 1980s when being in a union brought scorn and hatred from the Reagan Troops

Maybe I'm incorrectly looking at American History...but why were we on the glorious road to Socialism in the 1920s and 1930s, only for the tide to turn the other way and stay that way?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
edhopper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. Ronald
Fucking Reagan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. But unions were losing power way before Reagan was Prez
I remember a lot of Bob Dole Republicans hating, literally hating unions

The Movie "American Dream" did take place in the Reagan years, but what led up to it didn't
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trajan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Reagan was in pwer in the early eighties ...
Bob Dole ? .... Wasnt he in the late 80's early 90's ?

Your time line is backwards ...

Repukes hate unions, even when they joined them and benefited from their power ....

Self loathing ....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lpbk2713 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. Relentless assault by the GOP.
Edited on Sun May-01-11 03:21 PM by lpbk2713




Their message was ALL unions were corrupt top to bottom.
And ALL union members received extravagant wages for sitting on their butts and doing nothing.
It's the tried and true GOP philosophy --- tell a lie often enough and loud enough and sooner
or later it becomes accepted as the truth.






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NWHarkness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
5. In part, they were victims of their own success
As the unions improved working conditions for not just their members, but for workers in general, more and more people started to feel like they didn't need them anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
virgogal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. I think you nailed it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
etherealtruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Sadly, this has a ring of truth to it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moondust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. Yep, plus offshoring and GOP/corporate attacks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. That, and McCarthyism. In the 50s the communist witch hunts led
to purging of communists and socialists from the unions - in the 20s & 30s there were a lot of socialists involved in labor organizing. The purge led to a power vacuum, and a LOT of mob influence came into the unions, some more than others, which further caused distrust of unions. By the time most the mob influence was eliminated we were in the 60s and Vietnam, and the 'newly patriotic' anti-communist unions often took a stand against the anti-war protesters, splitting them from Democratic support, furhter weakening them.

Republican propaganda tarred all unions with the mistakes, or perceived mistakes, of a few - there were commies in the AFL, so ALL unions were full of commies; the mob controlled some longshoreman unions, so ALL unions were mob-controlled. And don't even start with the Teamsters...

It worked.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
6. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
ingac70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
7. The working class voting against their interests. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LARED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
8. a few things come to mind
Edited on Sun May-01-11 03:30 PM by LARED
Loss of manufacturing jobs in America

Global competition.

Union wage parity in many sectors
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
badtoworse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
13. Unions were so focused on management as their adversary...
that they ignored competition from workers in foreign countries who were willing to do the same job for less money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Yes, all those 'willing' workers in Communist China!
So eager and willing!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
badtoworse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Yes, China and a lot of other developing countries.
Edited on Sun May-01-11 04:33 PM by badtoworse
The point is that you ignore competition at your own risk. The unions did that and it bit them in the ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. agreed - they should have spent the 50s-70s lobbying for tarriffs
And NAFTA should have had Union input in it

Globalization WILL happen, its unavoidable

How you deal with it, however, is not a given
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dyedinthewoolliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
16. Being a Union member
and a Steward, or Delegate as we are called today, I think one of the biggest reasons is a piss poor Public Relations program. If you were to top 10 people on the street and ask them what they thing unions are all agbout, I'll bet you'd get 'lazy workers, corrupt bosses, illegal campaign contributions'.
Another issue is each union fails to realize that in-fighting amongst unions doesn't serve the cause. The IWW had it right, ONE UNION. All working people in one union or at least have all unions support each other. But using the old divide and conquer tactic Capital manages to pit us against each other and we do their dirty work for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Populist_Prole Donating Member (774 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. That's all too true. I think it's a matter of loss of critical mass, and perhaps classism
Edited on Sun May-01-11 04:27 PM by Populist_Prole
As far back as I can remember, thanks to the constant anti-union drumbeat by the corporate press and media, so many people see them as just the way you described. If someone they know or knew is a union member, and doing well, it is somehow undeserved.

Due to the snowballing of loss of industry due to offshoring, there are less and less people that do real work or make things, and more in the way of paper pushing. Indeed, it's so ingrained as to be a cliche. Speak of the workplace, and the automatic response is "the office". Traditional unionized type jobs are smaller in number and people employed as such are below the radar, culturally speaking. As labor lost its critical mass, the traditional Democratic party morphed into some DLC "if you can't beat 'em, join 'em" organization, just to be relevant as an entity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2Design Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
17. lies and truth and stories of people goofing off and being paid
all the examples are like the welfare queens as if it is all and not just a few
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
19. They became complacent tools of the Corporate establishment After McCarthyism.
Edited on Sun May-01-11 04:22 PM by Odin2005
They need to go back being radical activist organizations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
20. 40 years of unregulated, out of control corporate rule
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
22. Watch 'Hoffa' I think it shows what happened pretty clearly
Unions became the institutions they sought to reject initially. That's what happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bennyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
23. Jimmy Hoffa. the boogieman for the Bosses.
I think finally they were able to put a sinister face to unions and union bosses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bettyellen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
24. after the war salaries were generally high, a middle class emerged and promptly forgot how they came
to exist in the first place. Interesting also is how integration in the workplace coincided with an overall suppression of wages.
It;s like the big bosses decided they could stand employing women and african americans once they figured out how much less they could get away paying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Populist_Prole Donating Member (774 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. Amazing what so many take for granted today
The commonly trotted out bromide of "Unions were needed back when employers were unscrupulous, but we don't need them today" has got to be the lamest argument ever on the subject. They are not very observant, or more likely "movin' on up, to the east side" has made them snobby.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
25. Union protections and rights earned by union people were given to non-Union employees
People found out that when there was a Union at the job place they got the benefits no matter if they belonged to the Union or not - so why pay any dues. People who would have been treated like dogs got good working conditions because of what Union people did years before but don't have the good sense to understand where their good fortune came from. And over time Union participation started dropping and more and more of these free-loaders go to enjoy what the Union people had earned but of of course were unwilling to pay for themselves. They thought they were somehow special or somehow entitled to earn a living wage, or have benefits of some sort - they don't understand that these things were all earned for them by the blood, sweat, and tears of Union men and Women who stood up for something.

I hate a fucking Scab - the lowest form of mother-fucker that ever lived.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peace4ever Donating Member (434 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
26. When manufacturing started moving offshore, it was the beginning of the end
if you don't have a job, you have nothing to bargin for.

coupled with the heavy propaganda against them from the M$M for decades, they were fighting a losing battle.

however, with the assault against them by our legislatures, and all the history people are wise to today, people, with nothing more to lose, are starting to fight back.

better days ahead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Citizen Worker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
27. The Palmer Raids of the Wilson administration began the attack on Unions. During WW II Labor agreed
to not strike and abide by Roosevelt administration's setting of wages and prices. Following WW II Labor and capital came to agreement that essentially gutted the social justice aspect of the Labor movement. Raygun fired the air traffic controllers and we did nothing in response and here we are today picking the lint out of our navel wondering what happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
29. Primarily the Third Way or New Democrat movement after
Reagan's governance. That left unions with less union support in DC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SheilaT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-01-11 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
30. By the end of the 1970's there had been at least
a decade of anti-union rhetoric. There was almost nothing countering that rhetoric from the unions themselves. Average working people who had greatly benefitted from the presence of unions in the workplace, had no idea that their wages and benefits were as good as they were because of the unions elsewhere. States began to pass "right to work" laws, which were really "screw the unions" laws. By the mid-1970's I constantly heard co-workers routinely trash-talk unions, oblivious to what we gained because the unions were out there, even though our employee group was not unionized.

And so once Reagan became president, he could fire the air traffic controllers and wind up with Lane Kirkland, the head of the AFL-CIO on his side (which still staggers me to this day) and THAT was the death knell for the unions. Even now, I hear statements from people who ought to know better that "unions have gone too far" and other such crap, as if management actually cares about workers and will do all possible to protect them, pay them well, increase their benefits regularly. Ha! We are moving rapidly backward to the conditions that existed towards the end of the 19th century, although I have hope that thanks to modern media, the rank and file are being riled up and the unions will gain new strength in coming years.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC