Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama should immediately nominate Elizabeth Warren to head the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 04:08 PM
Original message
Obama should immediately nominate Elizabeth Warren to head the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau



FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
May 6, 2011
CONTACT: Public Citizen
Phone: 202-588-1000

After Senate Republican Retreat on Elizabeth Warren, President Should Nominate Her Immediately and, if Necessary, Appoint Her During Next Senate Recess
Statement of David Arkush, Director, Public Citizen’s Congress Watch Division

WASHINGTON - May 6 - On Thursday, 44 Senate Republicans sent a letter to President Barack Obama stating that they will oppose any nominee to head the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) unless the agency is first weakened dramatically. If there was any doubt that these senators are siding with Wall Street over ordinary Americans or that the senators simply oppose protecting American consumers and small businesses from abuses in the marketplace, that doubt now has been removed.

This letter is a failed attempt at misdirection. There is a strong, growing belief in Washington that the president will nominate Elizabeth Warren, currently a special adviser to the Treasury Department, to head the CFPB. Senate Republicans would be foolish to fight her publicly, and they know it. They would lose the fight – and would only strengthen Warren, the CFPB and the president.

So the senators are pretending the fight is about something else. They say they would oppose any nominee, not just Warren, because the agency is structurally flawed. They are forcing the president to make a recess appointment, which they will use to claim that he and the agency are unaccountable and undemocratic. Their arguments about the agency are specious, as recent congressional debate has shown. It is clear that they simply oppose a strong consumer protection agency.

The senators’ position is an embarrassment. After the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression, at a time when millions of Americans have been thrown out of their homes and millions more are jobless, these 44 senators are steadfastly attempting to block a critical solution to the problems: a single agency that will look after consumers in the financial markets, amidst a sea of regulators that work for banks. Two of the senators, Sens. Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe, both Republicans from Maine, voted to approve the CFPB in its current form less than a year ago. Their decision to sign the letter is mystifying – and is likely to draw ire from voters.

The Senate Republicans’ strategic gambit likely leaves Obama no choice but to appoint a CFPB director during a Senate recess. It also leaves him no reason to appoint anyone but the strongest candidate: Elizabeth Warren. That is a good thing.

But the president shouldn’t wait until the next Senate recess. He should jump-start the debate that Wall Street and its congressional allies fear by nominating Warren immediately and touting her and the CFPB loudly. The Senate should hold hearings on her nomination right away. If Republicans continue to block her nomination, then the president should appoint her during the next Senate recess, the week of Memorial Day.

###
Public Citizen is a national, nonprofit consumer advocacy organization founded in 1971 to represent consumer interests in Congress, the executive branch and the courts.


http://www.citizen.org/pressroom/pressroomredirect.cfm?ID=3334
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. Recommend Elizabeth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rubberducky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. Dems should sing this loud and proud. Fuckers don`t want anybody looking out for "the people'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BzaDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 04:14 PM
Response to Original message
3. K & R.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faryn Balyncd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
4. now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zenlitened Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
5. Should have been done last fall, ahead of the Nov elections...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I agree. But, unless one doesn't want to anger right-wing Republicans, now would be a good time
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
7. k*r
He should have her review the exemption that Geithner proposes for trillions of dollars in derivatives.

That would show a log of serious consideration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-06-11 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. What? And get Wall Street tycoons pissed off? Are you serious?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-08-11 01:33 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Well, like I say...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC