Atman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-11-11 06:50 PM
Original message |
Good gawd, Newt almost makes Trump look like a serious contender. |
|
Tweety's little profile of Gingrich was devastating. Not for Newt, of course, who doesn't care about anything except the words coming out of his mouth at any given moment. But in terms of a viable candidacy, this one's over the it was begun.
|
Ikonoklast
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-11-11 07:08 PM
Response to Original message |
1. There are two thing that I know that are a dead certainty: |
|
I will never be President of the United States.
Neither will Grinchy.
|
C_U_L8R
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-11-11 07:41 PM
Response to Original message |
2. What's with the crazy eyes? |
|
I watch a clip of Newt's heavily pancaked and coiffed Youtube announcement on Lawrence O'Ds show and it just seemed that Newt had the crazy eyes. Give 'em a watch.... they are rolling all over the place. What's up with that ??
|
MadBadger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-11-11 07:48 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Newt is by far the most credible on policy out of all the GOP that are running. Sure he's got some pretty big personal issues, but so did Rudy. And though Rudy didnt win, it probably wasnt that which sunk him.
|
Dj13Francis
(343 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-11-11 07:58 PM
Response to Original message |
|
What? Like he cheated on and left his sick and dying wife for another lady? And then he did it again when she got sick? So? It's not like he's a Democrat... I mean, John Edwards obviously could never get away with doing that once, but he's a Godless Democrat. Obviously Newt only did that because he loves America so much. Everyone knows that. No, personal issues won't matter for Newt. He's a winner. He engineered the Republican Revolution in the mid 90's... And as Charlie Sheen will tell you, there's only one thing in the world that matters. Winning.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat May 04th 2024, 04:45 PM
Response to Original message |