dmosh42
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-18-11 09:45 AM
Original message |
GOP stops bill to eliminate subsidies to oil conglomerates..... |
|
The only place I saw any reporting on this was a short blurb on Yahoo news this morning. Major media didn't even note there was a vote.(as far as I know) The vote was 52-48 to stop the subsidies of billions to a very profitable business that has no allegiance to anyone, and who is in control of our government. Meanwhile the news media is very accessible to all the scumbags who want to eliminate any social programs that separate us from finally dropping to the third world status.
|
Renew Deal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-18-11 09:46 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Your post makes no sense. |
|
Edited on Wed May-18-11 09:46 AM by Renew Deal
"Is this true GOP stops bill to eliminate subsidies to oil conglomerates....."
or is this true:
"The vote was 52-48 to stop the subsidies of billions to a very profitable business "
|
sufrommich
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-18-11 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. Three Democrats joined them, the usual suspects. nt |
Renew Deal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-18-11 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
4. It still makes no sense. |
|
That's what the subject implies, but the post says something different.
|
Matt_in_STL
(150 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-18-11 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. The post is technically correct |
|
Thanks to the procedures of the Senate, the bill required 60 votes in order to pass. The final vote was 52-48 to stop the subsidies, causing the bill to fail.
|
dmosh42
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-18-11 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
7. There was a 52 vote majority, but needs 60 votes...Do U see that? n/t |
Henryman
(187 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-18-11 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
8. To try to clarify; the bill wasn't stopped, it was defeated. n/t |
dmosh42
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-18-11 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
10. Yeah, thanks for your clarity!....... n/t |
mmonk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-18-11 09:49 AM
Response to Original message |
3. Can't cross sugar daddy. |
sasha031
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-18-11 10:09 AM
Response to Original message |
6. Ed Shultze covered it last night, probably the only one |
Commie Pinko Dirtbag
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed May-18-11 02:00 PM
Response to Original message |
9. So, the GOP is officially against balancing the budget. -nt |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed May 08th 2024, 02:31 AM
Response to Original message |