Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

i think its time we start our own type of identity politics

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
AlanCranston Donating Member (166 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 09:56 PM
Original message
i think its time we start our own type of identity politics
The republicans succeeded in the late 20th century by using a sort of identity politics. Nixon epitomized this in his silent majority speech. I think that we need to do the same thing. Seeing movies like Lords of Dogtown, The Big Lebowski, the Bill and Ted movies or the Cheech and Chong movies I see people who probably don't vote, but I think the democratic party needs to cater to these type of people. Obama should try to label these people as the "silent majority" in America. Similar to the attack ads used by George HW Bush (like Johnny Horton) we should use attack ads on republican candidates for being "buzzkill" or "player haters". We should try to portray ourselves as being the party of Jeff Bridges character in the Big Lebowski; a misunderstood likeable down to earth guy who doesn't judge anyone and compare the republicans as being the party of David Huddleston's character; an out of touch coot who doesn't understand how most of us feel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AlabamaLibrul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. Obama's DOJ and DEA has made state-sanctioned medical pot smokers a big-ass priority
Which, by the way, means he lied about how he wasn't going to do so.

You really think he's going to start calling them the "silent majority" and pandering to them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SugarShack Donating Member (979 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I spoke to the DOJ and the DEA and the priority was changed from Bush's "smokers" to Obama's growers
without a license in the medical states. That is still followiong the law. they are not going after the shops in the medical states that are following the laws. If they are now growing without a license....then they are breaking the law. Bush WAS going after any shops....regardless if they were following the law or not. So I don't believe your post. The priority under Obama to those agencies are the growers. Not the medical buyers of small amounts in the right to states. But you are not suppose to be smoking in any of those shops either...and they are. So they are breaking the law. But the DEA told me they did not have the resources to go after those law breakers. Of 35 illegal growers busts they should do daily in Calif..they can only do approximately 4-5 a day. Growers are Obama's number one priority directive to those agencies. Call them yourself.

I spoke of prop. 19 in California to them, the DEA....I said all the shops were smoking up, overwhelming the DEA. They thought prop 19 would pass, and they would just continue smoking in shops. But guess what? It did not pass. But the DEA cannot keep up with the illegal growers. You can grow for your medical supply, but you must have a license and be inspected. That is reasonable. If you want pot...expect regulation like anything else. I was told you will be inspected to insure that you are only growing to accomodate your clientle, your business needs, and not actually growing to supply a cartel. Makes sense to me. But the priorities were changed, the Presidential directives were changed from Bush to Obama. Bush did not honor states rights. Obama is.
The medical marijuana community is not following the laws. They want to toke up like Amsterdam coffee houses. It's not allowed. YOu must get your pot and leave with it. We don't have laws that allow smoking in the "despensing clinics" ...yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LoZoccolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-11 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. I like Obama's strategy of encouraging participation better.
I think Cheech and Chong and The Dude might be seen as people who don't participate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC