TheWraith
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-03-11 05:51 PM
Original message |
"No president has ever been reelected with 9% unemployment." |
|
And no President had ever been elected while black, either.
No Senator had been elected President since 1960.
No President in modern history has masterminded the successful elimination of the US' number one enemy.
And most importantly, no president has ever had to run for reelection against the psychotic clown brigade that is the Republican 2012 hopefuls.
Oh yeah... and we don't know what unemployment is going to be this time next year.
|
Skittles
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-03-11 05:54 PM
Response to Original message |
1. no president has been elected while female |
|
Edited on Fri Jun-03-11 05:54 PM by Skittles
just saying
|
itsrobert
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-03-11 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. No Mormon has been elected |
Skittles
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-03-11 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. percentage of females / Mormons please |
|
Edited on Fri Jun-03-11 05:57 PM by Skittles
|
Sheepshank
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jun-04-11 08:38 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
44. Well...by the time they get to heaven |
|
they will need to have 35:1 .....more women.
It's why so many fundie mormon towns expell naughty boys...it's an excuse to cull the competition.
|
JimGinPA
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-03-11 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
6. Probably Because The Right Woman Hasn't Run Yet nt |
Bake
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-03-11 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
7. Care to suggest who the "right" woman might be? |
DonCoquixote
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-03-11 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
|
Someone far to the left of Hillary, though I could see Oprah doing it, or Caroline Kennedy, or maybe Maria Shriver, all of whom are far to the left of either Ferraro or Hillary.
|
Bake
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-03-11 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
17. Frankly, I can't see any of the ones on your list as Prez |
|
Except Hillary, whom I supported in the 08 primaries.
I haven't seen enough of Warren to judge whether she is more than a single issue expert.
Bake
|
DonCoquixote
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jun-04-11 12:32 AM
Response to Reply #17 |
|
She made the machinery that pulled the dems to the right, and if in 2008 she said she would tear it down, I might have supported her, but to be honest, her campaign showed she was going to play right wing and let Bill run amok, which is why she lost.
|
TheWraith
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-03-11 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
|
I personally like Caroline Kennedy, but she would need some experience first. The others are non-starters.
Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, on the other hand...
|
DonCoquixote
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jun-04-11 12:33 AM
Response to Reply #24 |
|
or janet Napolitano, or even maybe Dianne Feinstein
|
DonCoquixote
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jun-04-11 12:36 AM
Response to Reply #32 |
|
Maxine Waters, Corrine Lee, Barbara Boxer,
all to the left of the center
|
TheWraith
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jun-04-11 12:56 AM
Response to Reply #32 |
|
Authoritarian war profiteer. I can't believe the same state elected both her and Boxer.
But seriously... put money on Gillibrand.
|
La Lioness Priyanka
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jun-04-11 01:08 AM
Response to Reply #24 |
36. i am with you on gillibrand! |
JimGinPA
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jun-04-11 07:16 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
40. Kind Of Like Pornography... |
|
I guess I'll recognize it when I see it. Or in this case "her". I haven't seen a woman run yet that that I have thought would actually be the best Presidential candidate.
|
emilyg
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-03-11 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
JimGinPA
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-03-11 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
Ignis
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-03-11 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #20 |
23. You're correct: Not Right enough for the banksters, apparently. |
emilyg
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-03-11 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #20 |
26. She would have fought |
DonCoquixote
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jun-04-11 12:29 AM
Response to Reply #26 |
|
for what?
War with Iran? Nafta? H1b visas?
It's one thing to say Hillary is skilled, but to say she if left of Obama makes no sense, she would fight to push the party to the center, as she always has, the reason many of us are angry at Obama is because he became juts like the clintons!
|
pnwmom
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-03-11 05:55 PM
Response to Original message |
2. And we don't know what sort of federal work program or |
|
economic stimulus that Obama will promote and the Democrats will push for -- and the Rethugs will work to stop. I hope, if levels remain high, they all go on record opposing a work program months before the election.
|
franzia99
(479 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jun-04-11 01:48 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
37. I don't see the dems pushing for anything. If you ask me the dem status quo needs to go and be |
|
replaced with a new generation of dems with good ideas re fixing the economy who actually have the courage to do something for regular people instead of their donors.
|
randr
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-03-11 06:04 PM
Response to Original message |
5. That is why the dems need to make a case as to how the republlicans |
|
have made destroying the economy and job outlook their priority.
|
The Velveteen Ocelot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-03-11 06:10 PM
Response to Original message |
8. Except that Roosevelt was re-elected in 1936 with over 14% unemployment. |
TheWraith
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-03-11 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
|
A good example of why it's hard to say "never" in American politics.
|
franzia99
(479 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jun-04-11 01:48 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
38. FDR was a lot more proactive on the economy than Obama has been. |
Drale
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-03-11 06:14 PM
Response to Original message |
9. I'm pretty sure FDR was reelected with 30% unemployment |
|
or at least somewhere in that area.
|
Kolesar
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-03-11 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
11. FDR was elected with 45% unemployment |
Wednesdays
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jun-04-11 12:31 AM
Response to Reply #11 |
30. Actually, it was 145% unemployment |
lumberjack_jeff
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jun-04-11 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #30 |
46. Is that all? Let me tell you about *my* childhood... n/t |
msongs
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-03-11 06:16 PM
Response to Original message |
10. number one enemy? US corporations have been outlawed? wishful thinking lol nt |
LLStarks
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-03-11 06:17 PM
Response to Original message |
12. I don't think we should celebrate if Obama gets reelected with unemployment any higher. nt |
Marr
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-03-11 06:32 PM
Response to Original message |
14. Luckily for the top 1%, they've purchased both parties and can |
|
supply and endless run of one-term presidents if need be. The new Bipartisan Party slogan is, "where you gonna go, sucker?".
|
Mimosa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-03-11 06:36 PM
Response to Original message |
15. What's to celebrate when jobless people are hurting? |
|
This economy is genuinely the worst in my lifetime, which is well over 50 years.
There are many 'if onlys'. Corporations should be made to manufacture HERE at home.
|
emilyg
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-03-11 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
18. Worst in my lifetime, too. We have |
ClarkUSA
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-03-11 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
21. They'd be hurting alot more if Pres. Obama hasn't made a deal to extend UI back in December. |
|
Doesn't stop some people from loudly bemoaning the extension of the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy, though.
|
MannyGoldstein
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-03-11 07:08 PM
Response to Original message |
19. No monotremes or cephalopods either. Nt |
bemildred
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-03-11 08:01 PM
Response to Original message |
22. "Past performance is no guarantee of future results." nt |
ScreamingMeemie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-03-11 10:36 PM
Response to Original message |
27. "The Green Bay Packers' season is done" "They can't possibly |
|
Edited on Fri Jun-03-11 10:37 PM by ScreamingMeemie
make it to the Super Bowl with that many injuries to key players".
It's true.
|
Dan
(595 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jun-03-11 11:19 PM
Response to Original message |
28. As long as the elderly |
|
believe that the GOP plan to make Medicare a voucher system - and potentially privatize Social Security if they get a majority - Obama has nothing to worry about.
|
woo me with science
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jun-04-11 12:36 AM
Response to Original message |
34. No President has ever been elected promising to double seniors' out of pocket health care costs. nt |
franzia99
(479 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jun-04-11 01:50 AM
Response to Original message |
39. It'll be sky high next year too. Economists predicted 8.5%. I doubt it could be lower. |
robcon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jun-04-11 08:29 AM
Response to Original message |
41. Ever heard of FDR? Unemployment was 16.9% in 1936. |
|
Edited on Sat Jun-04-11 08:30 AM by robcon
Fake facts. Fake conclusions. Fake thread.
|
JoePhilly
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jun-04-11 08:35 AM
Response to Reply #41 |
42. The OP is referring to a claim made all day yesterday in the media. |
|
I bet I heard it on 5 different shows.
|
Sheepshank
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jun-04-11 08:36 AM
Response to Original message |
43. Previous Presidents with 9% unemployment were the ones that caused the 9% unemployment n/a |
|
I think the hemmoraghing of jobs to the tune of 700,000/month under the Bush is more widely known.
|
robcon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jun-04-11 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #43 |
45. FDR caused the depression, Sheepshank? |
|
I think he saved the country after Hoover.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Mon May 06th 2024, 03:15 PM
Response to Original message |