kpete
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jun-04-11 09:57 AM
Original message |
Shandris
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jun-04-11 10:20 AM
Response to Original message |
1. After some consideration, I think I find the subject a bit off. |
|
It would be more telling -- as well as accurate -- if the real reason behind the 'occupying army' were shown and not a simple soldier. I think he missed a chance to make a more profound statement, because the 'intent' of the art, as I gather it, is pretty strong. Just misdirected.
But I'll be the very first to admit that I am terrible at interpreting art well, or deciding when a piece of art would be better off changed. I can't even draw stick figures well. :P
|
kpete
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jun-04-11 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
even when you pick up a piece of trash - you are creating a "work of art"
It's not what you look at that matters, it's what you see. Henry Davis Thoreau
|
tblue37
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jun-04-11 11:34 AM
Response to Original message |
3. ?? No image. I just get the little box with the red "x" in it. nt |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue May 07th 2024, 04:41 AM
Response to Original message |