And the reviews are in . . . .

[no_hypocrisy]

of "(Un)Defeated". Sarah's not going home with an Oscar.

-snip-

(I)ts tone is an excruciating combination of bombast and whining, it’s so outlandishly partisan that it makes Richard Nixon look like Abraham Lincoln and its febrile rush of images — not excluding earthquakes, car wrecks, volcanic eruption and attacking Rottweilers — reminded me of the brainwash movie Alex is forced to sit through in “A Clockwork Orange.” Except no one came along to refresh my pupils with eyedrops.

-snip-

If you’re hopeful (or worried) that this movie is the secret trigger for a Palin relaunch, don’t be. Even if you fixed the blaring soundtrack and took out all the symbols of the cataclysmic evil opposing Palin (barking dogs, disaster footage, a closeup of Rosie O’Donnell), you’d still be left with a hopeless sputtering jumble.

-snip-

In one scene, we’re told she didn’t care about polls; in the next, she’s bragging about her approval rating (88%). She says she doesn’t put much stock in such surveys — yet “I figured my administration must be doing something right.” So does her recent approval rating of 28% tell her that she must be doing something wrong?

-more-

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/palin_UjGgIgspncI6nzXikCaOQJ

[struggle4progress]

1. Is this that movie about that book-writing lady that everybody is trying to forget?

Or is this that movie that everybody forgot about that book that lady wrote?

I keep getting them confused

[K8-EEE]

2. This same reviewer gave a decent review to ATLAS SHRUGGED!

I'M JUST SAYIN......so I guess this is like way worse that that? If she was ever gonna get a decent review it would be from this Murdoch tool. More likely the rumors she is squabbling with Fox brass are true and they sticking it to each other!

[jmowreader]

3. I think I see one of the problems

Well, besides the subject.

Someone made a two-hour movie for $1 million--which is barely enough to cover the cost of materials.