Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Breitbart's #Twitterhoax - What We Know Now - DailyKos

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-11 08:02 AM
Original message
Breitbart's #Twitterhoax - What We Know Now - DailyKos
by Stef:
<http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/06/04/982102/-Breitbarts-#TwitterhoaxWhat-We-Know-Now?via=siderec>

Beginning on May 5, Stack and Wolfe began floating a rumor that there was a big sex scandal about to be revealed, involving a Democrat. How this rumor came to be they won't say. Stack says Wolfe told him to tweet it. Stack does seem to have been the first to do so. Wolfe then went on a mad retweeting frenzy, spreading the rumor and attributing it to @goatsred (Stack). Wolfe often copied @RepWeiner on these tweets.

(clip)

The Smoking Gun
Stack also contended that while he sent out the May 5 tweet first hinting that a “big time” Congressman was about to be ensnared in a sex scandal, he claimed that Wolfe actually provided him that information. Wolfe, Stack said, told him that he had heard the rumor from a source who worked for a well-known conservative web site.

After Stack sent out the initial tweet, Wolfe quickly ran with the rumor, attributing it--“via@goatsred”--to his online buddy. In retweets, Wolfe immediately attached Weiner’s name to the rumor, wondering “@RepWeiner are you this Congressman?” Stack did not have an explanation as to why Wolfe sought to launder the rumor through him. He also vehemently denied that he was Wolfe.

On May 11 Wolfe got more specific with the rumor, referencing Chris Lee, who was involved in a photo scandal. First Stack tweets it.

(much more and well worth the read)
<http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/06/04/982102/-Breitbarts-#TwitterhoaxWhat-We-Know-Now?via=siderec>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-11 08:11 AM
Response to Original message
1. Please kick so more will see this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dennis Donovan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-11 08:20 AM
Response to Original message
2. Kick and rec
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wndycty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-11 08:20 AM
Response to Original message
3. K&R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Champion Jack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-11 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
4. K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dhill926 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-11 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
5. happily k'd and r'd.......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-11 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
6. kick
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hassin Bin Sober Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-11 09:23 AM
Response to Original message
7. Kick and rec
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-11 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
8. Time for another kick!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-11 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
9. Kos is wrong about exploiting the underage girls names
so is the RW hack who is doing it too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-11 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #9
18. what? The article explicitly REDACTS the name.
Unlike the rightwing goons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warrior1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-11 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
10. I wonder if this guy is going to admend his statement about the congressman
Edited on Sun Jun-05-11 09:30 AM by warrior1
http://upload.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x1219527

He went after him, convicting him before all of the evidence was in, and is still coming in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-11 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
11. recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KathieG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-11 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
12. Kick!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-11 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
13. Bullies, thugs, cranks.
Disgusting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-11 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
14. Republicon Family Skank Values
As usual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-11 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
15. Anonymiss..the female counterpart of Anonymous has sent
the information to the FBI, according to a previous post on dailykos by Stranded Wind (if I recall correctly). I brought it to DU a couple of days ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessionalLeftist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-11 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #15
21. According to some DUers, there's nothing to send to the FBI
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 01:50 AM
Response to Reply #21
35. Well to be fair
1300 posts in 9 years?

You should be thrilled they chose your post to respond to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
11cents Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-08-11 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #35
48. How could I have been so wrong?
In the future I'll spend less time thinking with my brain and devote myself to posting on DU instead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warrior1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-11 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
16. kr
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
starroute Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-11 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
17. How many of these online right-wing gangs are there?
There was the bunch that was systematically downvoting leftwing posters and sources on Digg -- I think they called themselves the Digg Patriots.

And as far back as 2004, when DU was invaded by disruptors after the election, there were strong signs that many of them were working in teams to recommend each other's threads and reinforce the disinformation that was being sowed -- all of which often dragged legitimate DUers into following false trails, led to charges and counter-charges of trollery being thrown around, and generally caused a lot of bad feeling.

I don't know if it's just a pattern on the right to act like bullies and have no regard for the truth, if they're all getting their dirty tricks lessons from a central source, or if it might even be some of the same people going from one disruption to another.

But whatever the root of the infestation, it's something the left doesn't do and is therefore likely to be caught amidships by every time it happens.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-11 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. Are Right-Wing Libertarian Internet Trolls Getting Paid?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 01:46 AM
Response to Reply #17
34. I posted a post that dropped the other day
but I seriously think that they are gathering on the TOPIX forums and was actually wondering how many paid operatives run those sites and who pays for the forums?

My guess is that KOCH is funding TOPIX. They are rabid right wing--ANYTHING the least bit progressive is posted it gets shot down. Not only that, but they are cesspools of racist thugs. A good place for them to meet each other.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsLeopard Donating Member (717 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-11 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
19. K&R nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stlsaxman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-11 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
22. K&R...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-11 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
23. k&r...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kooth Donating Member (40 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-11 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
24. What We Know Now ...
Kick and Rec!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabatha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-11 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
25. Please Rachel Maddow
interview the parents who wrote that letter! Please, please!

Then ask Breitbart to come on the air and defend himself.

These people are scum and should be exposed for what they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidwparker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-11 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
26. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
solara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-11 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
27. K&R n/t
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LLStarks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-11 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
28. So, is there a tl;dr? The article is nice, but I'd appreciate a more conclusive summary. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-11 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
29. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democracy1st Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-11 10:40 PM
Response to Original message
30. K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bjobotts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-05-11 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
31. Excellent work.Thank you. Sleezy attention seekers will eventually get burned
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 01:19 AM
Response to Original message
32. K&R
Just wait, we will have more of these sorts of 'dirty tricks'. Through these dirty tricks and voter suppression the GOP hopes to overcome the negativity generated by the Ryan kill medicare bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iwillnevergiveup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 01:37 AM
Response to Original message
33. kick
mind-boggling
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 02:17 AM
Response to Original message
36. Okay, so who actually funds Breitbart?
10:1 it's Koch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 07:27 AM
Response to Original message
37. So the college student who received the tweet...
...saw through the scam....

<anip>

Friday evening I logged onto Twitter to find that I had about a dozen new mentions in less than an hour, which is a rare occurrence. When I checked one of the posts that I had been tagged in I saw that it was a picture that had supposedly been tweeted to me by Congressman Anthony Weiner.

The account that these tweets were sent from <@patriotusa76> was familiar to me; this person had harassed me many times after the Congressman followed me on Twitter a month or so ago. Since I had dealt with this person and his cohorts before I assumed that the tweet and the picture were their latest attempts at defaming the Congressman and harassing his supporters.

<end snip>

....but CNN, et al, can't? The media is complicit, again, in a smear tactic by a much-discredited right-wing muckraker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PotatoChip Donating Member (481 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 07:44 AM
Response to Original message
38. Breaking: Breightbart now claiming "New woman has come forward
Edited on Mon Jun-06-11 07:50 AM by PotatoChip
"claiming cache of intimate photos and online communications with beleaguered congressman"... just saw it on his twitter feed. The link provided takes you to his Big Government website w/a short statement about it. I don't want to link to this disgusting site but thought folks here might want to know.

I have no idea what further hi-jinks he has up his lying-a** sleeve, since there does not seem to be many details yet. But he alluded to "more to come".

As a sidenote: Joined Twitter literally just last night and added Breightbart among those I follow for this very sort of reason. As they say- keep your friends close and enemies closer.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PotatoChip Donating Member (481 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 07:49 AM
Response to Reply #38
39. Kick
Should I (or someone else) start a new thread, or not give this jerk the time-of-day until we know more?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dwilso40641 Donating Member (91 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
40. K&R N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chervilant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
41. Busted
Pwned.

Exposed for the lying liar that he is.

Can we stop paying attention to this pathetic person now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MikeMc Donating Member (636 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-06-11 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
42. +1 (past 24 hrs, so no effect). NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MikeMc Donating Member (636 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-11 07:58 AM
Response to Original message
43. Greg W Howard and Wrecking Crew
After Breitbart's press conference yesterday, where he attempted to save Weiner's family, I came back to your dk posts, as well as some of kpetes. The info STILL looks good to me, but I'm not a tech. I thought twitter was primarily for cell phones, until my wife told me otherwise, today. I did used to send instant messages in the early '80's, on Vax and Unix mainframes , but I'm way out of the loop today.

I still don't understand if Goatred, patriot76, 'Wolf', Stack, are with the wrecking crew, or just a separate group of secret sharers of Breitbart's syphilis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kuthek Donating Member (13 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-11 08:22 AM
Response to Original message
44. So much for the KOS and the Breitbart conspiracy
How many times does the KOS have to burn you before you learn not to touch the stove?

Complain about Breitbart but don't just make things up. It leads to zero credibility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MikeMc Donating Member (636 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-11 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #44
45. Breity's Syphilis problem causes me to doubt him. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MikeW Donating Member (554 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-11 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
46. none of this matters ... the guy admitted he did it ... end of story
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MikeMc Donating Member (636 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-07-11 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #46
47. I was hoping for an authoritative response, not a Man in the Street response, Mike. NT
Edited on Tue Jun-07-11 05:33 PM by MikeMc
I'm sorry for the incorrect post - title or header. There is a text. All repugs -- are jag-offs -- all the time. Not implying you. Just a general observation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC