Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Once Again it's a Woman

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
dynasaw Donating Member (664 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-11 08:20 AM
Original message
Once Again it's a Woman
who has to hold it together while her life falls apart:

"In a display of loyalty that surprised many outsiders, Cate Edwards walked into a North Carolina federal courthouse last week with her father, John Edwards, the former senator and presidential candidate who had cheated on her mother and shattered his career and their family."

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/09/us/politics/09edwards.html?_r=1&hp

Welcome to the heartbreak club Cate. Join your Mom, Hilary, Chelsea, Maria, Anne (Sinclair), SIlda (Spitzer) and of late Huma (Wiener) because now it's up to you to clean up the mess, hang on to your dignity and take care of the family.

I've often wondered if these guys would stand by their women if the reverse were true. 2011 and we're still playing by the same gender rules.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RZM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-11 08:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. I'm sure she would stand by Elizabeth had she been the one misbehaving
Family is family.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-11 08:58 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. misbehaving? what a mild word to use for what he did
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RZM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-11 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. I've never been much of an Edwards fan
Didn't have much of an opinion either way in 2004. But I found his 2008 campaign to be nothing but empty posturing. I got the sense he would have been just as comfortable campaigning as a conservative Dem. I lost most of my respect for him then, so the baby mama scandal was really just an anticlimax for me. But I get what you're saying . . . he's pretty shady. My point was that I don't think anyone should read much into his daughter supporting him. He's her father and I'm sure she loves him very much. In the long run it's probably best for kids to stay emotionally detached when parents cheat on one another, if only for their own sanity and emotional health.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trumad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-11 08:30 AM
Response to Original message
2. If my wife cheated on me.....
would I stand by her?

I think that depends on the circumstances.

If she was on a weekend trip with some friends and hooked up with a guy for a quickie...drank to much---dude was hot, whatever.... and that was that--- well... I think I'd be more forgiving....than...

If I walked into my house and caught her banging my best friend in my bed.

Again---it seriously depends on the circumstances.

In Weiners case---if my wife was tweeting a bunch of guys pictures of her private parts.... I'd say damn... what up with that? Would I leave her for it... don't think so although I'd like to know what the hell she's doing it for.

In Edwards case...if she got knocked up by some dude... especially a dude she had been having an ongoing affair with... that would be tough.

So---I'll say it again.... it seriously depends on the circumstances.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-11 08:33 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. those are a lot of public events that make it so visible, and i hate seeing the woman standing
beside the man while he does his apologizing, BUT

i have seen many situations where the man stands by his woman, long after she should be kicked to the curb.

so i dont see it as a gender thing either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-11 08:51 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Why isn't your wife your best friend?
Less need to worry about straying then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bunny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-11 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
4. You know, she's not his wife.
She's his daughter. Daughters can be a lot more forgiving than wives. I think she can stand by her father if she wants to, without any need to clean up his 'mess', or take care of his family, or whatever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dynasaw Donating Member (664 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-11 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
7. It's the Unconditional Support
that these women appear to give, as opposed to a response (from a man) similar to the one from the DUer above that is so striking. The response from the
DUer (presumably from a man) begins with "it depends on the circumstances" where a woman might hypothetically be the rogue case, is where the gender
divide appears to be so striking.

The other response from the DUer about knowing "many men" who have stood by their women who should have been kicked into the curb also doesn't c
cover the arena of high powered men (to whom we entrust our very lives). These are males who having basically shown appalling failures of judgement,
then need to run for cover under the skirts off "the little woman." The whole "for better for worse" pledge still seems to me to be an asymmetrical bargain
where equal measures of support are concerned. In slightly different circumstances, apropos of the Newt Gingrich case, would a woman politician hand over
divorce papers to a husband who has had his cancerous testicle removed? I can hear it coming, "well it depends."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RZM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-11 09:20 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. MItch Daniels took his wife back after she ran off
And it ended up costing him his chance at the Republican nomination.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2011/05/22/why_mitch_daniels_said_no_109948.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-11 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
8. Vagina = good. Penis = Bad. Progesterone = Good. Testosterone = Bad.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dynasaw Donating Member (664 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-11 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. Pure reductionism
this sort of thinking is unworthy of any DUer. time to learn the differences between sex (your plumbing) and gender (your gender socialization).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-11 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. bonobo = strawman? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 04:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC