Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Radiology experts find up to 45 microsieverts/hour near school zone — 90 times higher than Chernobyl

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Generic Other Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-11 05:08 PM
Original message
Radiology experts find up to 45 microsieverts/hour near school zone — 90 times higher than Chernobyl
The government should consider evacuating children and pregnant women from a wider area around the Fukushima No. 1 power plant because radiation levels remain high even outside the 20-km no-go zone, Kumi Naidoo, executive director of Greenpeace International, said Thursday in Tokyo.

Naidoo’s team of radiology experts found hot spots that had a maximum hourly reading of 45 microsieverts of radiation alongside a school zone. <...>

Jan Beranek, an expert on radiology from Greenpeace International who joined Naidoo’s trip to Fukushima, recommended that the government widen the evacuation zone to at least 60 or 70 km from the power plant.

He said there were parks and public spaces where the level of radiation activity hit 9 microsieverts per hour.

Even some nursery schools that have already undergone a decontamination process had a relatively high reading of 0.5 microsievert per hour, he said. That would translate into an annual exposure of 5 millisieverts, which was the evacuation threshold for Chernobyl, Beranek said. <...>

http://search.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/nn20110610a6.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-11 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. In a related story --
Edited on Thu Jun-09-11 05:26 PM by AtomicKitten
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theophilus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-11 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. It certainly looks to be a CUTANT! Does it have any other "differences"? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-11 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Vincent says no. LOL.
Edited on Thu Jun-09-11 05:25 PM by AtomicKitten
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generic Other Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-11 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Not related -- the bunny is a hoax -- the fallout is real
Yikes. I like bunnies with ears. That one is sad looking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-11 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. video:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-11 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
4. 45 microsieverts is not a "high" reading.
That's slightly more than the 40 microsieverts you get on an airplane ride from NY to LA. Doses of that size have also been repeatedly proven to be harmless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-11 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. "an annual exposure of 5 millisieverts, which was the evacuation threshold for Chernobyl"
is the point of the story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peace4ever Donating Member (434 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-11 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. It's insane to compare that to a plane ride
But I'm sure that won't stop you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtbymark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-11 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. of what X rays?
I doubt many people are exposed to hot alpha and beta particles while flying in a plane, yup sure, plenty of Strontium up there, cesium floating around in the cabin area right?

please dont be an apologist for a failed experiement
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-11 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #4
19. Plane ride, eh?
I don't know how you folks can sleep at night.

Seriously.

Don
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClarkUSA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-11 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
6. Are these facts known to the Japanese populace? I have heard of the protests parents have staged.
Edited on Thu Jun-09-11 05:25 PM by ClarkUSA
I know people who are very reluctantly traveling to Japan on business. They are carrying their own packaged food items with them for snacking and eating only imported food and drinks during the inevitable wining and dining. Their families are not happy they have to go at all.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtbymark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-11 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
8. Hey, It's great that they're killing a part of their population to "save face"
reported today- high levels of Strontium 90 found in E.Tokyo (over 160km away)in sludge that they are incinerating. Just show the residents within 50 miles the pictures of the kids from Pripyat. And remember that Pripyat was evacuated 48hrs after Chernoble.

In the end (IMO) The exclusion zone will be twice the size of Chernoble's, the thousands of deaths from cancer will be glossed over and covered up, and the gov't will say they have decontaminated the area in 10 years (which is a lie). Thats the best case scenario if they "buttoned" it all up today. If the 3 cores (or just one) meltsthrough to the water table....well, nothing will be able to live on that Island (Honshu?) for thousands of years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-11 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
10. Going by those readings, I wouldn't let my kids go to school there.
This story has been ignored by America's press corpse for a reason: We need the nukes -- meaning our corporate masters need to make big bucks off Big Science.

Thank you for the heads-up, Generic Other. Unlike Corporate McPravda, you're doing the First Amendment proud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generic Other Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-11 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. I have self-serving reasons
My family home -- 15 generations-- 100 km from fukushima. 7 Up, 8 Down as the Japanese would say. Time to invoke the Daruma, a talisman of good luck. He is round and can roll with the punches. 7 up, 8 down. Only one eye is filled in. The other stays blank until we get our wish.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-11 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. My wife has visited Nippon...her best friend lived in Hiroshima for several years...
...So, I've heard wonderful stories of an amazing place and great people.

My main contact with the people of Japan was professional, a delegation of educators from the Sister Cities program came to the town where I was a newspaper reporter. They treated me as a VIP, giving me several wonderful gifts that I treasure. I'll never forget them.

The earthquake, tsunami and nuclear disasters have made me fear for the people of Honshu and all of Japan and the world at large. I pray we learn from them and build a better future. In the meantime, we must do all we can who are here.

Those new to the region may enjoy the National Geographic feature on Basho and his trip journey through northern Honshu:

On the Poet's Trail

PS: Good luck and strength to you and yours, in this and future generations, Generic Other.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
godai Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-11 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
13. Where does "90 times higher" come from? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generic Other Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-11 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. quoted here?
"high reading of acceptible level 0.5 microsievert per hour vs. high reading currently being measured at parks and public spaces where the level of radiation activity hit 9 microsieverts per hour."

So by my math, that would seem slightly higher than 90?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
godai Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-11 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Thanks...This is a little misleading, since it's microsieverts. It's about 20x
Nothing to sneeze at but apparently this was a relatively low level of radiation used for evacuation at Chernobyl, and it's the highest levels seen in a few samples away from Fukushima.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-11 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
17. not good
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC