RandySF
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-13-11 08:50 PM
Original message |
I hate to admit it, bur Sarah Palin could have "won" this debate. n/t |
Chipper Chat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-13-11 08:55 PM
Response to Original message |
1. I watched and found it very boring. |
|
John Doofus King actually asked this question of Rick Santorum: "Leno or Conan?" God help us.
|
senseandsensibility
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-13-11 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
4. What does that even mean? |
|
I am so glad I am not watching.
|
Kaleva
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-13-11 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
6. Each candidate got to answer a "fun" question. |
senseandsensibility
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-13-11 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
8. Well, good thing I'm not watching, then. |
|
Doubt I could handle that much "fun.":) Just sounds pathetic to me.
|
Kaleva
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-13-11 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
15. I could only watch it for awhile before coming back to DU for the real action! |
Raine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-13-11 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
7. Leno or Conan, which he preferred |
|
couldn't even answer that one.
|
Chipper Chat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-13-11 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
11. A more appropriate question for Ricky would have been: |
|
"Fred Phelps or Michael Savage?"
|
Raine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-13-11 08:55 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Yeah at least by not participating her stupidity and nuttiness |
|
wasn't exposed the way the others were. :puke:
|
Kaleva
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-13-11 08:56 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Watched for a bit. Wasn't all that impressed overall. |
|
Romney seemed to avoid answering every question and instead, attacked Dems in general and President Obama in particular.
Herman Cain and Ron Paul seemed to be the most direct in their answers while Newt reminded me of a college professor.
|
Raine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-13-11 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
9. NOT a serious one among them |
|
very depressing when I think of the old days and then even the republicans had candidates that weren't so stupid and nutty. It makes me so depessed about this country. :-(
|
LLStarks
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-13-11 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
14. Cain was vague and downright evasive. nt |
Atman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-13-11 08:56 PM
Response to Original message |
5. I disagree. She only would have only dragged it down further. |
struggle4progress
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-13-11 09:03 PM
Response to Original message |
10. "Palin: She's Smarter than Us Other Republicans!" probably won't help the GOP much |
richmwill
(972 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-13-11 09:11 PM
Response to Original message |
12. Yes, she would have... |
|
...Because the conservative lapdogs would have given a standing ovation to anything she did or said. There would be hundreds of threads on Freeperville tonight stating how Palin "hit a GRAND SLAM out of the park home run tonight!", weeping about how she's "exactly what our lost country needs right now", etc. Even if she had a booger hanging out of her nose during the entire debate, they would have spun it into a "total win for Sarah".
|
FarLeftFist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-13-11 09:22 PM
Response to Original message |
13. I think Obama won that debate. |
Kaleva
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-13-11 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
DrinkBeerNotTea
(44 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-13-11 10:02 PM
Response to Original message |
spanone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jun-13-11 10:03 PM
Response to Original message |
18. pee wee herman could have won that debate |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu May 02nd 2024, 03:01 PM
Response to Original message |