Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Feds Calling Witnesses Before Secret Grand Jury Probing (Bush Era) CIA Abuses

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 08:31 AM
Original message
Feds Calling Witnesses Before Secret Grand Jury Probing (Bush Era) CIA Abuses
Source: Talking Points Memo

Federal prosecutor John Durham has begun calling witnesses to testify before a secret grand jury probing the 2003 death of a man in CIA custody and other abuses at the agency, Adam Zagorin reported for Time.

A subpoena signed by Durham obtained by the publication indicates that "the grand jury is conducting an investigation of possible violations of federal criminal laws involving War Crimes (18 USC/2441), Torture (18 USC 243OA) and related federal offenses."

Durham, a Republican-appointed U.S. attorney based in Connecticut, was appointed by Attorney General Eric Holder to investigate whether some at the CIA went beyond the Bush DOJ's guidance on the use of so-called "enhanced interrogation" techniques.

Nearly a year ago, Holder said Durham was "close" to making recommendations to him about how to move forward if it was determined individuals went beyond what Holder called "pretty far out" legal opinions issued during the Bush era.

Read more: http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/06/feds_calling_witnesses_before_secret_grand_jury_pr.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
1. K&R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greybnk48 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
2. Am I being cynical if I view this as a dog and pony show
to legally vindicate the Bush era CIA of any wrongdoing? And of course, Bush, Cheney, Rice, Rumsfeldt, Powell, Ashcroft and the rest of the evil fucks associated with that dark and dirty era didn't do anything illegal either...riiiiiiigghhtt.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I agree this is just smoke ...its an Abu Ghahib trial underlings
get the wrap while Bush and Cheney walk ...we saw the Department of Justice under Fitzgerald with Scooter Libby
who walked


this is just a facade ...this is NOT Justice

a Republican appointed investigating a Republican president

this looks like searching for a scapegoat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kaleko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Not cynical.
Realistic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. Every so often they pull this - they monitor the attitude of the American
people regarding their interference in world and US affairs and when it gets very negative they have a little investigation. Nothing ever changes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
20. no, you are being realistic
lets see what happens... I bet you are right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jtrockville Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
5. BEYOND DOJ guidance? Didn't DOJ guidance violate torture statute?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. It certainly did, but it's like eating an elephant: you do it one bite at a time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. First you question the lowest guy on the totem pole -- the one who
was just following orders. After all, Cheney has already confessed to his part in what happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
9. This case needs to pick up speed before 2012...
It's about time we look back, Mr. president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. Yes, it is about time; past time, really
But I share the cynicism that says this "investigation" will end with a clean bill of health for CIA, or at most the end of one or two low level paper pushers' careers. The folks giving the orders, monitoring the results and demanding more will skate away unmolested.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. Probably right...the laws only apply to the small fish.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gkhouston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
11. Until I saw "2003" I was wondering which Bush they were referring to. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
12. What a joke.....
"....went beyond the Bush DOJ`s guidance......."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gkhouston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
13. Has this adminstration prosecuted anyone from the Bush administration for anything?
Anything at all?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. Obviously, the CIA is not accountable to anyone ....
well, maybe still a handful of Senators they can control and that's all --

the full Congress has no right to know what they're doing any longer.

And, imo, they've continued to take over more and more of our government,

but seemingly not yet enough of our DOJ?


Certainly, when Poppy held office, they were controlling the entire government/presidency.

Have they given up their aims in that regard?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dotymed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. "Poppy Bush"
was the head of the CIA before he was VP. The POLITBURO has it's hands around our necks.

They help the corporations, they help them..

This "transparency" thing that candidate Obama promised, has really happened.

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
14. The not-secret secret grand jury.
When it hits DU, it's not exactly a secret anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoapBox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
16. It would be nice to hold them accountable...but it will go no place.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
17. Slightly aside from this ....
obviously, the CIA will now have to take over more of our DOJ -- !!!

But, recognizing the imo conspiracies put in place by W/Cheney ... noted comments

by Sy Hersh on Amy Goodman's show one night last week where Hersh was stressing that

much of the "structure" put in place by Cheney when he was in office sitll exists!!


The CIA with Operation Mockingbird has kept America from knowing what has really been

going on in this nation -- and their own evil doings.

America needs to have this information and wake up quickly!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
21. yuh... well, I'll believe it when I see people getting locked up
and not just underlings either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
obama14 Donating Member (51 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-14-11 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
22. CIA ABUSE - This can only go to The CIA Director.
Notice, its CIA Abuse. Bush wont get touched. At the most the director would get nailed.

Its a none starter - unless they find Bush told the director to do something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-11 07:47 AM
Response to Original message
23. Both Holder & Obama having said they wanted to "look forward" in regard to
Bush/Cheney crimes, this doesn't make sense. This particular crime, plus the other crimes against humanity at Abu Ghraib, began at the top. Those who carried out these horrors were, at the very least, influenced by Bush's/Cheney's thuggish leadership. And as long as the torture continued, that administration had to have known about it.

So WHY -- out of the blue -- is Holder going after the small fish in this rather old crime?

And he is asking a lot of questions -- like who took photographs of the body, and when. Durham, according to these sources, has also asked about civilian contractors at the site, mentioning one by name, and has probed the source of the multiple shoe prints apparently found on material used to wrap the "Ice Man's" body.


If this is a foot in the door in an attempt to stealthily work up to getting those at the top, I'd be thrilled. But I've learned enough about the BFEE to feel certain that's not the case. At this point, I'm confused at this investigation at this point in time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC