Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Requiring Church Attendance as a Bail Condition

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-11 09:04 AM
Original message
Requiring Church Attendance as a Bail Condition
Eugene Volokh • June 16, 2011 6:13 pm

Today’s Mississippi Supreme Court decision in Mississippi Commission on Judicial Performance v. Dearman orders that Mississippi Justice Court Judge Theresa Brown Dearman be reprimanded and suspended for 30 days for — among other things — requiring church attendance as a condition of bail:

In April 2006, Judge Dearman presided over the initial appearance of Philipe D. White, who was charged with felony possession of a controlled substance, cocaine base. Judge Dearman set White’s bail at $2,500 and, as a condition of bail, required White to attend church at least once a week....

In a ... case in October 2009, Judge Dearman set Christopher T. Gray’s bond at $5,000 and, as a condition of his bond, required him to attend church twice a week. He had been charged with sale of a controlled substance....

By engaging in the following conduct, Judge Dearman knowingly misused her office by: (1) sua sponte reducing bonds and charges without proper motion; (2) conditioning the reduction on church attendance; (3) exceeding her authority by altering bonds after a defendant had been released on bond or had waived preliminary hearing, or after a preliminary hearing had been conducted; (4) permitting others to create the impression that they were in a special position to influence her as a judge; (5) initiating and inviting ex parte communications; and (6) presiding at her nephew’s initial appearance.


As the six-item list shows, Judge Dearman’s reprimand was also based on a good deal of other misconduct, including one matter that raises a different First Amendment question — whether the judge can be faulted for “author columns in a local newsletter in which she discussed her differences with the sheriff and advocated for her policy in drug cases of setting low bond amounts with conditions,” a matter on which the majority and the dissent disagreed. But I’m pleased to say that the judges agreed that the church conditions were indeed not legally authorized (though the dissent suggested that they may have been mere error, and not a basis for formal discipline). Ordering a person to attend church, on pain of being sent to jail if he doesn’t comply, is pretty clearly unconstitutional, even under the views of the dissenters in Lee v. Weisman (1992), and certainly under the view expressed in the Lee majority opinion.

http://volokh.com/2011/06/16/judge-reprimanded-and-suspended-for-30-days-for-among-other-things-requiring-church-attendance-as-a-condition-of-probation/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-11 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. well, this is Miss. one of the religiously insane run states
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-11 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
2. Sounds like the MS Supreme Court ruled correctly.
Good for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lance_Boyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-11 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
3. Suspended for 30 days? What does it take to permanently remove her?
How many Amendments to the Constitution does she have to shit on before she gets canned?

Maybe she ought to be a preacher. I hear that's pretty lucrative.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RadiationTherapy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-11 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
4. You do not want me at your church; I assure you of this.
You do not want me in your church. There would be problems; not violence, not offensiveness, but sincere, philosophical, problems. I am not a quiet man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theaocp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-11 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. The Holy Pranksters would make for great youtuberry. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nichomachus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-11 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. Same here. I ask questions -- out loud.
I've also been known to stand in protest during a sermon. Not making any noise -- just standing there. Drives a preacher nuts, because everyone is looking at you and not at him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-11 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
6. I'm religious and I hate this condition. I would stay in jail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BillStein Donating Member (403 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-11 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
7. Is that a violation of the establishment clause
or the prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WolverineDG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-11 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. try "free exercise" nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-11 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
8. k&r n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ret5hd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-11 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
10. I wonder what the judge would do if the defendant decided to go to a...
church of satan service

or a muslim service

or even, (gasp) a rastafarian "service"????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-11 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
12. Our courts have gone to shit. Overpaid simpletons ruining lives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-11 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. This is what happens when you let idiots elect their judges.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-11 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
13. I always say that some parts of the South are little tin-pot theocracies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawson Leery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-11 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. Thank you for the term, "tin-pot theocracies".
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-11 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. You're welcome! n/t
Edited on Thu Jun-23-11 12:30 PM by Odin2005
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-11 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
16. I make my living by people attending church...and I think court-orderd church attendance
Edited on Thu Jun-23-11 11:41 AM by Critters2
is unconstitutional as all hell. A reprimand doesn't go far enough.

edited because I can't type
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riderinthestorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-23-11 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
18. Oh but he should just 'suck it up". It's only a little prayer!
Just sit quietly and meditate. Why get all fussed up over this?? Nobody ever said the Founding Fathers believed we should have freedom FROM religion!!!111!!!





:sarcasm: (for those who haven't participated in any of DU's infamous separation of church/state threads before)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC