eleny
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-08-11 06:57 PM
Original message |
Ed Schultz coming up on MSNBC to take over coverage |
valerief
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-08-11 06:57 PM
Response to Original message |
1. FINALLY! A voice of reason!!!! nt |
malaise
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-08-11 06:57 PM
Response to Original message |
2. The serious folks are arriving now |
liberalmuse
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-08-11 06:59 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I've been toggling between NBC (Seahawks vs NO) and MSNBC. I am having a hard time sticking with MSNBC right now, but with Ed on, I will stay longer. Besides, the Seahawks are winning (so far). Again, yay!
|
AlabamaLibrul
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-08-11 06:59 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Thank the god of your choice. I may as well have been watching FOX the last several hours |
Mira
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-08-11 07:01 PM
Response to Original message |
Raine
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-08-11 07:02 PM
Response to Original message |
1776Forever
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-08-11 07:05 PM
Response to Original message |
7. Thank you - now we will be able to hear the real story.... n/t |
LuckyStrykes
(50 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-08-11 07:07 PM
Response to Original message |
8. Pin the tail on the donkey, Ed |
eleny
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-08-11 07:07 PM
Response to Original message |
9. He's interviewing Rep. Gijalva now |
|
Talking about how the tone we use in the country has to be watched. We can be on opposite sides but not enemies.
|
malaise
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-08-11 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
|
:cry: Ed has lined up the Dems - PHEW!! Eliot Engel on now.
|
eleny
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-08-11 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
13. Yes he did. He's been threatened so he sure knows. |
eleny
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-08-11 07:08 PM
Response to Original message |
10. His last thoughts were that he was going to be attentive to security immediately |
eleny
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-08-11 07:09 PM
Response to Original message |
12. Now interviewing Rep. Elliot Engel of New York |
eleny
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-08-11 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
14. Engel just said our system decides things by balance not bullets |
|
Sharron Angle take note - there aren't second amendment remedies.
|
RKP5637
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-08-11 07:16 PM
Response to Original message |
CTyankee
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-08-11 07:16 PM
Response to Original message |
16. It's good we have Ed on MSNBC tonight to put perspective on this. |
|
We have a shot at getting the right perspective on this shooting with him. He'll give the straight stuff on this, no doubt...I'm very glad this is happening...glad Ed was available to come in for a special segment like this...we need it...
|
eleny
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-08-11 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
17. And I hear that Keith is coming up in the next hour |
|
I'm relieved that they got into this immediately to be sure that the right wing can't get their "equivalency" meme to take hold of the public's imagination.
|
Divine Discontent
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-08-11 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
18. exactly! I'm disgusted there's the hint of 'it's not political' being spoken when he targeted |
CTyankee
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-08-11 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
19. Excellent! Just what we need to head this off! Thank god for Keith et al. |
CTyankee
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-08-11 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #17 |
20. Excellent! Just what we need to head this off! Thank god for Keith et al. |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Mon May 06th 2024, 05:29 AM
Response to Original message |