Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Michelle You Can Have My Pornography When You Pry It From My Wet Hairy Hands

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
lame54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 12:01 PM
Original message
Michelle You Can Have My Pornography When You Pry It From My Wet Hairy Hands
http://liberalvaluesblog.com/2011/07/08/michele-bachmann-first-to-sign-pledge-banning-pornography-and-calling-homosexuality-an-unhealthy-choice/

Michele Bachmann First To Sign Pledge Banning Pornography And Calling Homosexuality An Unhealthy Choice
July 8, 2011 — Ron Chusid
There was a time when there typically was a religious right candidate in the Republican primaries. Such candidates would inevitably be beaten by the establishment candidate. Today the religious right dominates the GOP, and almost all candidates promote social conservatism. It will be interesting to see how many candidates sign a pledge from Family Leader. Michele Bachmann was the first to sign this:

Presidential candidates who sign the pledge must agree to personal fidelity to his or her spouse, the appointment of “faithful constitutionalists” as judges, opposition to any redefinition of marriage, and prompt reform of uneconomic and anti-marriage aspects of welfare policy, tax policy and divorce law.

The Marriage Vow also outlines support for the legal advocacy for the federal Defense of Marriage Act, humane efforts to protect women and children, rejection of Sharia Islam, safeguards for all married and unmarried U.S. military service members, and commitment to downsizing government and the burden upon American families.


In addition, candidates are asked to recognize that “robust childrearing and reproduction is beneficial to U.S. demographic, economic, strategic and actuarial health and security.”

In addition, Think Progress reports that this calls for the banning of “all forms” of pornography and states that homosexuality is both a choice and a health risk. Undoubtedly conservatives will fail to see how these conflict with claims to support limited government, not to mention violating the First Amendment. http://thinkprogress.org/lgbt/2011/07/07/263006/iowa-group-asks-republican-candidates-to-agree-that-homosexuality-is-a-choice-pornography-should-be-banned/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. I remember some of the combative DU threads in the past about porn
It would seem to me that some DUers may find themselves agreeing with Bachman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. The DUers who have problems with porn have it for different reasons than Bachmann.
Although I disagree with banning it, I recognize that some (much?) porn involves serious exploitation of women. (and possibly men.) But I think creating a black market would exacerbate the problem rather than solving it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roberto IS beto Donating Member (55 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Me, too
I, too, have problems with the whole "exploitation" thing. That's why I'm opposed to porn involving humans. Porn solely between Bonobo chimpanzees is the only porn I'll watch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. Thanks for the visual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
4. Michele with one "L" please. Otherwise I'm thinking it's Michelle Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lame54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #4
11. can do
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 12:27 PM
Response to Original message
6. Interesting to see how FreeRepublic will react to this.
Don't you think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HopeHoops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
7. That's going to kill her GOP: primary chances. Her "base" is the main consumer group of porn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Texasgal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. don't forget they hold stock in cheetos
as well!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dickthegrouch Donating Member (838 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
8. Mutually exclusive
“faithful constitutionalists” as judges,

If they were faithful constitutionalists they could not fail to approve same sex marriage - since it's a civil contract and demands equal protection. They MUST NOT listen to any religious argument if they are being faithful to the separation clause.

FAIL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RB TexLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-09-11 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
10. childrearing and reproduction is beneficial to U.S. demographic, economic, strategic and actuarial h

How about we save the cost of raising and educating children and let other countries deal with that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
metalbot Donating Member (234 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-10-11 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
12. I've seen a few of these threads
But even clicking through to the link and reading the "pledge", it doesn't actually say anything about banning pornography. There are plenty of reasons to hate Bachmann, some of which are in that pledge, but the "she wants to ban porn!" is really just a misleading distraction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC