Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Seriously, I am fucking TERRIFIED that my SSI check might not come nect month.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 08:54 PM
Original message
Seriously, I am fucking TERRIFIED that my SSI check might not come nect month.
I am beyond angry. I am fucking sick of every one of these fucking assholes in Washington, be they Dem or Puke, playing with people's lives.

:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Texasgal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. Do you really think you won't recieve a check
next month?

Really?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. I would not bet money on it - but if you have a repuke congress critter
let them know you are blaming them!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Mine is the DINO Collin Peterson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snooper2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 08:53 AM
Response to Reply #4
115. I'll be money on it...anybody up for a $50 bet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. That's what Obama said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 01:11 AM
Response to Reply #5
91. No doubt with the expectation of millions of people sitting up, taking note, & screaming at Congress
In the armed forces, that's what they call "fire for effect."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divernan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 06:40 AM
Response to Reply #5
101. Obama's sole purpose WAS to terrify all recipients.
Republican politicians know the way that SS is set up, that those checks will continue to go out. Obama didn't throw this threat out to GOP leadership in one of their all to brief meetings. Obama did this to panic the populace - everyone who receives such a check and all their families and friends, solely to generate panicked calls to Congress. That puts the burden on the Senators and Representatives (of both parties) to explain fiscal realities of SS (FICA moneys continue to come in - there is a surplus in SS funds, etc.)to all the many constituents who are at best alarmed and at worst completely terrified.

It was a vicious, cynical, cruelly manipulative thing to do to seniors and veterans and the disabled, as well as their families and friends. And whomever endorses or supports that action is equally callous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 08:37 AM
Response to Reply #101
111. Well, then I'm pretty callous. I'm a senior and I for one think Obama did the right
thing by telling the truth to the American people, in case they have tuned out of politics entirely and haven't been listening.

What is callous, vicious, cynical and cruelly manipulative is not what Obama is doing by making such a statement. He did not couple it with "and therefore you must take cuts in your benefits." He simply said there would not be the money to pay those benefits if the government defaults on its debt. He was making the issue clear for people who haven't been following the circus in Washington.

I don't shoot the messenger if he is simply telling me the truth.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stopwastingmymoney Donating Member (66 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #111
137. +1
and thank you for saying it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jtown1123 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #101
112. And whose to say he's not setting us up to begrudgingly accept chained CPI
don't worry folks! Your checks will still go out but you'll never get a COLA again!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CleanGreenFuture Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #101
121. I wonder how many people ended up in the hospital (or worse) upon hearing that
on the CBS Evening News last night.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #121
128. About as many as show up...
When homeowners go through this very same ritual every few years when there is talk of ending a tax break on mortgage interest... and when CA voters get the business over Prop 13 every few years.... and when the Pubbies trot out abortion... these are wedge issues. This is nothing new.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. It should never have been suggestded in ANY context. Why didnt he threaten to stop the wars instead?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. It was a shitty thing to do, but he needed to get people's attention
Defunding the wars isn't going to stop conversation over the dinner table, but this (non-existent threat) would. See below for a quasi-literate explanation. There is nothing to stop. It is all automated, direct deposit and by law, in its own account, not in the general fund for discretionary reallocation (although they have "borrowed from it", they can't reallocate those funds).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bornskeptic Donating Member (951 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-11 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #11
144. He didn't threaten anything.
He was asked if he could guarantee that the checks would go out on time, and he told the truth. I understand that people might be disturbed if their checks are a week late, but the millions of Americans desperately searching for employment would be somewhat inconvenienced by the inevitable recession which would follow a default on the debt. The 14th Amendment requires the Administration treat servicing the debt as the highest priority. President Obama and the Democrats would have been glad to support a debt ceiling increase which would have prevented all this three months ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsuki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
47. Are you saying Obama lied?

Really?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Abq_Sarah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #47
66. Pretty much
And a lot of people bought it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reformist2 Donating Member (998 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #66
72. He can't promise that the checks will keep coming until the debt ceiling is increased.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Abq_Sarah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 03:54 AM
Response to Reply #72
98. He can't stop them
Unless he shuts down the computer systems that generate those checks. That would have to be a deliberate action with the treasury choosing to divert incoming FICA taxes for other uses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 12:19 AM
Response to Reply #1
85. The poster said he was "fucking terrified", is that not enough for you?
Really?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marrah_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 08:41 AM
Response to Reply #1
114. Do you know what it's like to have a fixed income?
To REALLY be reliant on something to survive and then have someone telling you it might not be coming?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #114
126. +
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. The GOP will back down, and President Obama will make sure all the checks are sent out on time. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #2
25. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
63. a cheap, SICKENING tactic
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 01:14 AM
Response to Reply #63
92. So let's see: if he doesn't fight dirty, he's a lousy caver. If he does, he's "sickening."
Yeah, that makes sense. After all, the angry shouting left has only spent years demanding that he "just fight!!!!" like that's a strategy. But one time he actually throws an elbow, and it's "SICKENING."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brickbat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 07:05 AM
Response to Reply #92
103. This wasn't fighting. This was like being in a car and my spouse is swerving the car all over the
road at 80 mph to get the kids in the back to shut up. It might work, but it sure changes the way I feel about my spouse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divernan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 07:24 AM
Response to Reply #103
105. Spot on analogy!
Sort of like holding someone by their ankles and hanging them from a high window. When they scream in terror, you laugh at them. "Aw, quit whining! I'm not going to actually DROP you! I'm just doing this to make a point to someone else!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #92
133. Bingo! You've got it nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CakeGrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 01:57 AM
Response to Reply #63
94. Oh crap. He laid out what will happen because of the R's
Pile on when someone calls him weak, pile on when he takes the initiative to frame an argument.

Just admit you can't stand the guy under any conditions and be done with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #94
134. People apparently don't want to hear what's at stake because of R's in Congress.
Well, this is what's at stake. I guess Obama should just tell people that no matter what, marshmallows and sunshine will always come their way. He's not Daddy, or God, for chrissakes. He can't make Republicans do their jobs or give a shit about Americans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #63
125. Exactly ... SS/Medicare should NEVER EVER be used
as a bargaining chip! :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. How do you think the Dems are playing with your life?
Edited on Tue Jul-12-11 08:57 PM by pnwmom
It's the Rethugs who would like to wipe out payments to SSI and cut payments for SS and Medicare. The reason we're close to default now is because the Dems have been fighting back -- not giving the Rethugs all the cuts they want, but insisting that some of the budget balancing comes from increasing taxes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. If Obama had balls he would threaten to have the treasury just print the needed money.
Wall Street will go into a panic over fears of inflation and will put pressure on the Pukes to give in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zen Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. They already have. Your check will arrive as scheduled next month.
Remember, when you're playing poker, you can't let them see you sweat. The President is an excellent poker player, so don't sweat. It's the Republicans who are desperate for raising the debt ceiling without actually looking like they want to - the McConnell plan is called "We the Idiots, Surrender."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudToBeBlueInRhody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #6
16. LOL
Your check wouldn't be able to cover a loaf of bread or a gallon of milk if he did that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. If he had to do it a deal would come quickly enough that...
...such hyperinflation would not happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wednesdays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #16
139. Whattaya mean? With more money printed, we'd be rich as the Germans in 1923!
Edited on Wed Jul-13-11 09:44 PM by Wednesdays
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. Obama threatened today to not send out social security checks. Obama. the Dem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pipi_k Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. Well shit...can't say as I blame him...
It has to suck stuffing and licking all those envelopes by himself.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #12
23. See post #13 and comment, please?
I have been one of the hardest on him and will bust his (metaphorical) balls over Medicare age limit increases, but what he said *today* is meaningless. BY LAW and the way the SYSTEM WORKS, not sending out SS is a non-starter and he knows it.

There is a reason he went on CBS News to "announce" this and it had nothing to do with actually doing it. If he were going to do this, he would have held a no-questions presser to warn seniors given that it is 2 weeks away. He may not be the best negotiator, but he isn't dumb. Notify the country via one media outlet? And last place CBS of all people? With an early AM interview with permission to leak before the 6:30pm air time?

Think about it for a minute. This was just another trial balloon in this nonsense we are mired in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #12
58. He might not have a choice. It is not at all clear how the 14th Amendment
Edited on Tue Jul-12-11 09:55 PM by pnwmom
would be interpreted by the S.C. but many people think the wording would apply to things like Treasury bonds, but not to Social Security.

I don't think he was trying to threaten anyone with what he said on S.S. He was trying to be realistic that this is the corner the Republicans are trying to box him inside.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #58
71. There's a difference between a threat and scaring people.
Obviously, as the grown up, he wouldn't even think of scaring people.

As the empathetic being that he is, he couldn't possibly overlook how what he said would be taken.

Then again, there's absolutely no way he'd threaten the poor and elderly.

The only logical, and therefore real, possibility is that he never said the words.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #71
75. We will only have 55% of the funds we need if the debt limit is not raised.
And Social Security, SSI, Medicaid, Medicare, Medicaid, and unemployment benefits are a huge part of the budget. It's impossible to imagine them not being affected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #75
79. Social Security has its own funding,
Edited on Tue Jul-12-11 10:53 PM by dflprincess
It is not part of the budget.

It does not add to the deficit.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reformist2 Donating Member (998 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #79
80. Not this year it doesn't!

The 2% payroll tax makes SS just as dependent on borrowed money this year as all the other programs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #80
81. Good point
Makes you wonder about the real motives for the payroll tax "holiday", doesn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indurancevile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 05:45 AM
Response to Reply #81
99. yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 12:31 AM
Response to Reply #75
89. Why would that matter when SS funds are not part of the Fed.
Budget? However, they just okayed billions more for their wars. How about he threaten that those funds will not be paid? The Republicans don't care whether or not elderly people get their money, but they DO care about their war profits.

SS should not be a part of this discussion period.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrmpa Donating Member (707 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #12
76. He didn't threaten, he said there was a possibility that the checks
would not be sent out next month.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
some guy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 02:23 AM
Response to Reply #12
96. Well, no.
Edited on Wed Jul-13-11 02:25 AM by some guy
Scott Pelley: Can you tell the folks at home no matter what happens that Social Security checks are going to go out on August the 3rd? There are about 20 billion dollars of Social Security checks that have to go out the day after the government is supposed to go into default.

Obama: Well this is not just a matter of Social Security checks, these are veterans checks, these are folks on disability, their checks. There are about 70 million checks that go out --

Scott Pelley: Can you guarantee as President those checks will go out on August the 3rd?

Obama: I can not guarantee those checks go out on August 3rd if we haven't resolved this issue because there may simply not be the money in the coffers to do it.

It's a little vague with regard to SS specifically. The question was SS, the initial response was to expand the discussion beyond just SS, and was interrupted.

Will SS go out? It should, because it's a separate fund, or is supposed to be.

edit to add link: http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/07/12/7068367-if-no-deal-by-aug-2-obama-cant-guarantee-social-security-checks-will-go-out
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
7. I hope that the resolution of this comes very, very soon
You don't deserve to be feeling squeezed like this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #7
27. McTurtle's deal would set 3 more negotiation points after today
with the 3rd being scheduled for summer of 2012.

If Obama/Dems go for this to end the impasse now, we get to go through this 3 more times before the election.

Happy to provide a link if you haven't seen the details yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #27
49. That's how I understand the proposal, too
It's nuts, imo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #49
52. Especially since the Prez said no 30, 60, 90 day deals kicking the can into election season
They just gave him what he specifically said yesterday he would not accept.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Psephos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
9. The Treasury literally does not know how to stop printing the checks.
Beyond that, it does not know how to start them up again if they should figure out the first problem.

The computer systems that generate millions of checks every single day are a nightmare of bailing wire and duct tape. No one knows how to shut the system down, because the software that runs the system isn't a system, but more like a confederacy of dunces, and there's no manual.

I say you have no problem, regardless of what the loser Congress does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
10. Not to worry.
They are NOT going to stop sending the checks.

if they do, granny is going to riot in the streets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Diclotican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #10
34. cliffordu
cliffordu

Never underestimate Old Granny, She have lived a long life, and know the irrgangs of the world better than most of us.. She might even grown up in a time when SS and Medicaid was new...

Maybe, if she is really old, she might even have lived in a time, BEFORE the New Deal.. And them who lived before New Deal, tend to never forget what it was like then.. And would fight harder than most of us, to protect SS and the other tools from New Deal and other programs thereafter..

She might even stand before Capitol Hill, and tell the congress where they should go if they was to stop the checks..

Diclotican
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #10
57. And if she does, I will be right there beside her. And I hope every
American is.

If they fail to send out the checks, we call a national general strike.

I called for it first, right here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
13. Relax. It was a dirty trick, but they aren't going to stop checks. Here's why
First, It isn't a human resources/payroll issue any more and hasn't been since the mid 2000s. No one is cutting checks and licking stamps. Your Medicare comes out of your check as an automated deduction and the balance is deposited to your bank account (or prepaid debit card if you chose that option). Unemployment and WIC work the same way. It is all automated and computer generated.

Second, SS is its own fund. The President fucked up when he questioned "money in the coffers" as SS is stand-alone and at a surplus. He did that to freak people out. Right or wrong, it is legislative sausage making and it sucks either way. The fact that he misled people into thinking SS (and Medicare/Medicaid) are part of the budget/deficit debate was deplorable, but in faced with the August 2nd crisis we are facing, understand why he said that.

Your money will be there. It is constitutional. Period.

Look up the FDR quote on why he did the SS bill the way he did so that "no politician could fuck with it" in the future (paraphrasing, obviously). It details how they protected it by (i) payroll deduction while in the workforce and (ii) keeping it seperate from the budget so that it couldn't be abused for other things.

You are going to be fine. :hug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #13
20. people still get checks in the mail
I don't know how many, but I know several in just my block who do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #20
31. Which are automated and computer generated
I would need to check, but it is my understanding that you only have a short period of time to convert to direct deposit or they send you a debit card and just reload it every month (prepaid card, not credit).

Even for what checks are going out the door, they are not hand generated and stamped. They are computer generated with those annoying "fold here and tear the flap" deals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #31
60. no, there are no fold and tear flaps
They are government checks that come in an envelope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RebelOne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #20
117. Mine is direct deposit. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #13
24. I'm in my 20s, I'm not on Medicare. I get SSI because I'm a disabled adult working part time.
Edited on Tue Jul-12-11 09:19 PM by Odin2005
My SSI check comes in the mail, about $250. it covers the part of my rent not covered by Section 8.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #24
39. It is still computer generated. Automatic.
As noted above, it would take an act of congress to shut it off (no pun intended).

I am telling you - you have nothing to be worried about, friend. If something does go wrong, post here and ask for help and you will have an army of people willing to jump on the phones and call their local/regional/national media and politicians on your behalf to get it straightened out ASAP.

I am half lying on the couch, half sitting with a cat in my lap, typing with 2 fingers to preserve balance so am just going to reference another comment: Please read post #23 before logging out for the night, aye?

Rest assured, you have nothing to sweat here. :hug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #13
29. Some people are still receiving paper checks
though I would expect it would be nearly as hard to shut that part of the system down as it would the automated payments.

And Obama is the one that said Social Security payments won't be made if the U.S. defaults. Strange, he said nothing about how he'll keep paying for his wars if that happens.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #29
45. Those are still automated
They come with those annoying 'fold the flap and tear here' formats, and they are temporary. If you do not provide a direct deposit within x time, they send you a debit card and reload it when payments are due. Here, WIC and Unemployment are automatic - direct deposit or debit card. No checks will be sent (not even the first one).

As to your second comment - cat in lap, on couch balancing laptop and typing with 2 fingers: Can I refer you to comment 23 as response?

Thanks for responding. This is a horrific topic and I am nauseated that we even needed to go there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #45
56. The paper checks come in a regular "Dept of Treasury" envelope
Edited on Tue Jul-12-11 09:56 PM by dflprincess
I know because my brother was using my address and his SS disability checks showed up in my mailbox for just over a year. After he died in May his April check arrived, I returned it and then resent it made out to me in care of "the estate of..". But they do not come in the obnoxious envelope you describe.

But, they are going to switch everyone over to direct deposit or debit card early in 2012 or maybe it's later this year. I forget what the notice he received said - (I think that showed up in April and I knew he wouldn't be here to make the switch so I didn't worry about it).

Whoops - forgot to add. I hope you're correct in post #23 - I suspect you are. That being the case though, it was really stupid for Obama to make it sound like people wouldn't get their checks if this isn't something they have to be concerned about. He sure didn't do himself any good with a comment like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #56
61. I am sorry for your loss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #61
65. Thank you
I appreciate that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #65
67. It is never easy. Edit to add:
Edited on Tue Jul-12-11 10:18 PM by Ruby the Liberal
:hug:

Edit to add - just saw your edit. Yes, had this been a national presser, I would take it seriously. Think of the actor Morgan Freeman announcing the meteor in Deep Impact. ;-)

A single, private, leaked-12-hours-before-airtime-on-one-network announcement (network who isn't even front row or regularly called on in pressroom pressers) tells me two things (i) WH owed them a marker, or vice versa and (ii) this was a trial balloon.

No way something of this impact is imminent and the WH/Dems give an exclusive to one outlet + rights to a day long leak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Philippine expat Donating Member (412 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #56
140. Actually if you just recently or are soon to sign up for
SS your check must direct deposit.
By 1 MAR 2013 all checks will be DD or the debit card.
For those on a real tight budget I urge them to use DD because of possible fees on the debit card
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Riftaxe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #13
32. Ahh, your no fun
going and letting the facts out and all... :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #32
40. Bad, bad Ruby
:spank:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reformist2 Donating Member (998 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #13
73. You forget that Social Security is NOT stand alone this year because of the 2% payroll tax cut.

That means even Social Security relies on government borrowing now. Sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southernyankeebelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
15. Friend you aren't the only one. I get a soc security ck and my husband get a retirement check from
the military. We get a double wammy. I already called my republican rep and republican senator and told them that they are effecting my health worry over this. I told them to stop acting like children and I would be blaming the republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
18. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. It is a reality, the anger.
It is wrong to ridicule those of us who have that anger.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #21
26. You're so right Mad!
:hug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vanje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #18
30. You're not angry?
You must have a fantastic , stable income, and a gorgeous lovely trouble-free life.

You probably think that "bad economy" means lines on a graph.

To a lot of us, "bad economy" means No medicine, No food, No job, Lose your house, lose your pride, Lose your hope, Lose your future, Lose your respect, Lose any chance of your children doing better than you.

If you knew what I knew, you would be angry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudToBeBlueInRhody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. The OP says he's angry all the time about everything
Edited on Tue Jul-12-11 09:27 PM by ProudToBeBlueInRhody
It sort of lost it's power after the 58th time he posted how angry he was about something.

I'm angry about certain things, but if I was angry all the time, there would be no point in living.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vanje Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. So I take it, You're not angry
How rarefied and wondrous it must be , to be you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudToBeBlueInRhody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #35
43. You clearly didn't read what I wrote
Sorry if that's an issue for you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #33
38. I don't think that is true. I think this is a time for legitimate anger.
We are being manipulated. Those of us who are retired, those who are disabled, depend on what the system has been for years.

Obama only took moments to undo confidence people have felt in their government.

He should be firmly standing for SS, not intimating the checks won't come. It may be called hardball, but it's cruel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #18
36. If you aren't angry than you aren't paying attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #36
48. +5
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberalynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-11 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #36
148. +++++100000
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #18
37. Are you dependent on a Social Security check? Is it YOUR lifeline? If not,
I suggest you look up the word "EMPATHY" or maybe "sympathy" in the dictionary...perhaps Google could be your friend. What a shitty thing to say to someone who has to depend on their SS check to live. My G-d. Shame on you. You're a Democrat? I highly doubt that....though the parties ARE starting to blur, so I suppose you could be one of those Blue Doggers. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudToBeBlueInRhody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #37
44. I'd take it more seriously.....
....if he wasn't angry about loud music......cheese sandwiches.....people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #44
55. Why should that matter. He's worried about getting his check so he can LIVE...you know, eat food,
pay bills, and buy medicine. That's what this OP was about. My heart goes out to him. That has got to be the most frightening feeling in the world...not knowing where your next meal will come from. It's absolutely pathetic that ANYONE in this country has to worry about that...and needlessly so because Obama didn't HAVE TO make that threat, but he did. He didn't have to put SS on the table, but he did. Think of all the senior citizens who have nothing but that check to live on every month. Think of how they felt when they heard today that they may not get that check next month. The maneuver was a disgusting thing to do to dependents of SS, IMCPO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #44
74. When was I angry about cheese sandwiches?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 01:15 AM
Response to Reply #44
93. I'm sure he's devastated by your lack of concern.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #18
42. Open your eyes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #18
51. Never noticed that before of the poster, Obama probably scared hundreds of thousands ...
of people who depend on those checks to pay rent and buy food.

Why did the Dems not push the issue of raising the debt ceiling when they extended the Bush tax cuts.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
28. You'll get a check
It just won't be worth as much. It won't be worth much at all in the future if the republcans have their way with the 'Full Faith and Credit' idea that is propping up the house of cards.


And the pukies are trying like hell to pull cards out from the bottom of the stack!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bahrbearian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
41. If Obama was a true liberal he would have said ' I guarantee that the SS checks will still go out"
He is trying to scare people for their support, thats not leadership.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #41
46. ABSOLUTELY CORRECT
this is utter fucking cowardice
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #41
54. + 1000. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #41
59. That is the smartest thing I've read all day! SPOT ON!
I couldn't agree more. This was such a mean thing to do and it was NEEDLESS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tallulah Donating Member (127 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #41
68. Thank you
That's the exact thing I told someone today after getting a call of near hysteria. What Obama did today was wrong. Instead of reassuring, he sent an old lady into a panic. I don't like that at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #41
77. How can he? When we will only have funds for 55% of our budget
if the debt ceiling isn't raised?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bahrbearian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #77
82. The funds are supposed to be there ,all that is needed is to pay people to handel the transaction.
and most of the transactions are done electronically.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 12:20 AM
Response to Reply #77
86. Good lord.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divernan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 07:28 AM
Response to Reply #77
106. Did you pull that number out of your nether regions? Got a link?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pecwae Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 06:42 AM
Response to Reply #41
102. This is a post
that should go to the WH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #41
127. EXACTLY! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snoutport Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
50. Hey there--you've inspired me to write a letter to Obama
And my reps. There is a high price to letting this all become a crisis.

It will be OK though--I have confidence SS checks will go out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raschel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 12:25 AM
Response to Reply #50
87. I'm not so sure. I may have been years ago, but not now. I'm especially concerned that SS keeps
getting thrown out there in the talking points. The camel's nose is in the tent, and it makes the future look very uncertain for SS.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CakeGrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 01:58 AM
Response to Reply #50
95. What does POTUS have to do with this? The R's would not raise the debt ceiling.
This is on THEM.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divernan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 07:30 AM
Response to Reply #95
107. No. POTUS was the one who made the empty & false threat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unkachuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
53. I share your concern, Odin2005....
"...be they Dem or Puke, playing with people's lives."

....for some of us, me included, Social Security is all we have and fucking with Social Security is no joking matter....it's food on our plate, it's paying the electric bill, it's a visit to the dentist or doctor....

....mess with Social Security and we'll be forced to vote for ANYONE who promises not to....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 09:56 PM
Response to Original message
62. Odin
you'll be fine - that was just an utterly cheap political ploy - utterly DISGUSTING
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
64. Ignore those in this thread who put you down for your concerns.
I have them, we all do. They are real fears about things people depend on. They should not play games with us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 12:04 AM
Response to Reply #64
83. I wouldn't want to put anyone down for their concerns. But seriously,
if Social Security and SSI checks don't go out next month, there will be a political earthquake the likes of which we have never seen. It just can't happen and it won't happen. If you don't believe me, bookmark this thread and then we can come back next month and see who was right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #83
84. For ages even Dems have talked about need to "reform" SS.
It is not fair to seniors to keep doing this. Democrats are supposed to stand up and loudly say it is untouchable.

They are not doing that. They are playing word games. They are actually already cutting future payments by lowering the payroll tax. We will pay dearly for that later.

Democrats protect Social Security, they do not cave in to such changes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
totodeinhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 12:59 AM
Response to Reply #84
90. I was talking about the fear that Social Security checks won't go out next month.
Cutting Social Security by a certain percentage while continuing to pay out some level of benefits, or raising the retirement age, or cutting back COLA's are one thing. But not sending out any checks at all is something else. And I think you are painting with too broad a brush. Plenty of Democrats are standing up and defending Social Security. But unfortunately, we don't know for sure where the leader of the party, President Obama stands.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raschel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #83
124. Minnesota state workers will not receive backpay after the shutdown is over. It can happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 12:26 AM
Response to Reply #64
88. Thank you. My sentiments exactly, odin and floridian
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tallulah Donating Member (127 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
69. You were not the only one upset
Just know it won't happen. You'll get your check.

I thought better of Obama. Now I'm just pissy. He should have talked to Grandma himself after that nasty stunt. Damn him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
70. It will come in. This is all political theater created to make people
accept false choices.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divernan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 07:31 AM
Response to Reply #70
108. This was a calculated Psy-ops torture of seniors, not "theater"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 07:33 AM
Response to Reply #108
110. To me, it is all the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-12-11 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
78. I could last two months without real damage to my financial situation...
Edited on Tue Jul-12-11 10:50 PM by WCGreen
But after that...

Dire straights.

Kick and Rec...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RebelOne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #78
118. Fortunately, I could last a year if worse comes to worse.
But after that, as you said: Dire straits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cereal Kyller Donating Member (400 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 03:42 AM
Response to Original message
97. Kick!
This needs to be seen by the ENTIRE forum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryOldDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 06:08 AM
Response to Original message
100. Both sides are playing a dangerous game of chicken....
and a pox on both their houses. As you said these are LIVES they are fucking with.

I don't know what the motivation was behind Obama's comments yesterday, other than a huge scare tactic aimed at those who can't do a damned thing about this mess, but I do know that McConnell, Boehner and their ilk couldn't give two shits about the people who depend on SSI. All they want is to destroy whatever's left of the Obama presidency, even if that means destroying the country itself.

Just fucking INSANE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Urban Prairie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 07:13 AM
Response to Original message
104. When I became disabled 4 years ago, my ex-employer (USPS) told me that although my application for
disability retirement benefits had been approved, I still was required to apply for SSD, and if approved, then they would only be responsible for the balance of 40% of my averaged annual earnings, using my "high three" years over the course of my 20+ years of employment. I also was employed by a railroad for about 15 years, prior to being employed by the USPS. So I did as they requested, and was approved by SS for disability benefits on my first attempt. So I believe that the USPS and the RRRB would be on the hook for making up the difference in income, due to the (unlikely) event that my monthly SSD income was to be temporarily halted, but any "delay" would likely have to span a period that would be more than just a month or two. Absent SSD income for even just one month would mean that I would NOT be able to pay our monthly doctor bills, Rx drugs, rent, auto insurance, or our utility bills.

But despite the unlikelihood that SS, SSD, SSDI distributions would temporarily cease, the sociopathic, genocidal, global corporate capitalist whore Rethugs are obviously hell-bent on ultimately getting rid of ALL government programs and services, and will still be plotting together to try to figure out how and when they can introduce and pass legislation meant to eliminate them, and as a result, inevitably killing off millions, if not tens of tens of millions in the US who are now, or sooner or later will be partly or completely on the federal dole, w/o making it appear like they are directly responsible for doing so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divernan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 07:32 AM
Response to Reply #104
109. And Obama has made it abundantly clear that SS/SSI/Medicare/Medicaid are always on the table
Edited on Wed Jul-13-11 07:35 AM by Divernan
It's like a big bunch of carrots that he has waved under the GOP's collective nose. So the GOP didn't bite this time? The GOP knows that Obama is willing to put cuts to these programs in play whenever the stakes are appealing enough to him and the MIC/Pentagon/Big Corporate Donors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marrah_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
113. You should not have to be worrying about this.
It's just not right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
116. Are you "terrified" enough so that...
..if you received one with only a 15% cut,
you would be grateful?


Aside from that, how are you enjoying the Kabuki Theater?
Can you appreciate the precise Timing & Choreography ?

Unfortunately, I've seen this one before,
and it doesn't end well for the Working Class, the Retired, and the Poor.

Cherish your memories, SUCKER!
because we're TAKING everything else!
Hahahahahahaha!



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tuckessee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
119. Small price to pay to spread freedom-laden shrapnel around the world.
Just remember all those pretty purple thumbs that represent the dawn of freedom and justice in Iraq. Just think of the glorious Lybian rebels who watch starry-eyed as US taxpayer paid-for cruise missiles explode on the horizon.

Americans must sacrifice so that others can be so fortunate to be killed by the greatest military in history.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divernan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #119
120. The honor of shortening our lives to finance$4.5 million dollar drones!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mistertrickster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
122. If that happened, there'd be MASSIVE BACKLASH and the Dems
would sweep every election in 2012 . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B Calm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
123. What's nect?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
129. You've seriously never seen big ticket items go on the block before? Really?
Edited on Wed Jul-13-11 04:12 PM by JuniperLea
Homeowners go through this very same ritual every few years when there is talk of ending a tax break on mortgage interest... and when CA voters get the business over Prop 13 every few years.... and when the Pubbies trot out abortion... these are wedge issues. This is nothing new.

It got you moving didn't it? It worked, right?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #129
130. "It got you moving didn't it?"
It terrified him. I suppose that's movement. From a comfort zone to out of one.

I'm going to point a gun at your head to make a point to someone, but don't worry, it's just to get you moving, I won't really pull the trigger.

You understand. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #130
135. Yeah, cuz those things are all alike...
And you've never ever heard of wedge issues being trotted out during an election cycle... no way... never happens.

:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-11 01:38 AM
Response to Reply #135
141. The analogy is correct.
And you've never ever heard of wedge issues being trotted out during an election cycle... no way... never happens.

No shit? Really? Thanks for the deduction, Sherlock. Doesn't change my analogy a single iota. Sorry it was too deep for you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-11 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #141
142. And I'm sorry...
That your insults are such weak tea... must be that your message is as well or you could have afforded to take the high ground.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-11 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #142
143. You talking about high ground is like Cheney talking about peace.
And if my insults are weak tea, yours aren't even tap water.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-11 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #143
145. I know you are but what am I?
Really?

Eat your peas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-11 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #145
146. I like spaghetti better, a little garlic bread on the side.
Maybe a nice side salad to go with it.

This was your best post yet....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbtries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
131. don't be terrified.
it will be there. if it isn't, let us know. you'll be okay.

breathe.

now being pissed, absolutely. it's all a crock of SHIT. but your check will be there; fear will not make it be there if it will not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
132. Your check will be there. As will all the others who receive them.
This is nothing more than raising the political heat on the Republicans. They're being forced into a corner as their being assaulted by their own voters calls, emails and letters.

We're the ones who always complain that the GOP always get their way and we always cave. Well, they're not getting their way yet this time, and by Zeus the WH is playing hardball like I've not seen before.

It's a bloody shame this is what it takes to get peoples attention, but it appears it is exactly what it took. Now not only are you and I talking about this issue, so is the MSM and everyone else in the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ZombieHorde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
136. I'm sorry. All I have for you is a cyber-hug...
:hug:

I hope everything works out for us poor folk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-13-11 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #136
138. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-14-11 07:07 PM
Response to Original message
147. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC