Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pedestrian and her son mowed down by drunk, son is killed but SHE is charged with vehicular homicide

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-11 12:10 PM
Original message
Pedestrian and her son mowed down by drunk, son is killed but SHE is charged with vehicular homicide
A Marietta mother may serve more time than the driver who hit and killed her 4-year-old son.

Raquel Nelson, 30, could be sentenced to up to 36 months at a hearing July 26, said David Savoy, her attorney. She was convicted Tuesday of homicide by vehicle in the second degree, crossing roadway elsewhere than at crosswalk and reckless conduct, said Savoy.

Jerry L. Guy, the driver who admitted hitting the child when pleading guilty to hit-and-run, served a 6-month sentence. He was released Oct. 29, 2010, and will serve the remainder of a 5-year sentence on probation, according to Cobb court records.

Nelson was attempting to cross at the intersection of Austell Road and Austell Circle with her three children when her son was struck by a car, said Savoy. The child later died from his injuries. Nelson and her younger daughter suffered minor injuries and her older daughter was not injured.

Guy confessed to having consumed "a little" alcohol earlier in the day, being prescribed pain medication and being partially blind in his left eye, said David Simpson, his attorney.


http://www.ajc.com/news/cobb/pedestrian-convicted-of-vehicular-1014879.html




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-11 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. I don't get it. Why was the mother charged? She wasn't even in a car!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geardaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-11 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Apparently she was jay walking.
I thought pedestrians had the right of way no matter where they cross.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jtuck004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-11 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Nope. Just at intersections and in marked areas., at least in the few
Edited on Thu Jul-21-11 12:47 PM by jtuck004
state licensing manuals I have read.

A driver could be at fault through DUI, of course, oralso negligence, for not acting like a reasonable person would (interpreted by the court or jury). But generally pedestrians only have right-of-way in marked areas, or at intersections, and the driver mostly gets a pass if you walk out in front of them outside of those areas.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dana_b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-11 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. and the article says that she was at an intersection
Edited on Thu Jul-21-11 12:56 PM by dana_b
this makes no sense or someone (journalist) has the facts wrong
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lance_Boyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-11 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. picture here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dana_b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-11 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #9
18. thanks
that is not an intersection however putting her in jail is not going to help one bit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cid_B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-11 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
23. A person doesn't have the right......
... to jump in front of a moving vehicle. There is a reasonableness standard...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lance_Boyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-11 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
4. This was posted here earlier in the week.
The driver and the jaywalker were both at fault. There were sidewalks on the street on which she exited the bus and a crosswalk within a quarter mile or so for safe crossing. Her decision to take the shortcut cost her son his life, regardless of the culpability of the driver who hit him (who has been charged as well).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-11 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. very sad story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-11 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. a quarter mile is reasonable distance out of the way?
what the heck?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lance_Boyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-11 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. More reasonable than jaywalking into death, yeah.
She bears much of the blame for the incident.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theHandpuppet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-11 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. A quarter mile IS a long distance...
... when you are walking with three small children.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lance_Boyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-11 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. And jaywalking, as proven in this instance, can be deadly
when you drag small children along with you. :shrug:

Which is preferable, walking a quarter mile, or seeing your kid squashed because you made him jaywalk?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indurancevile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-11 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #10
19. crossing 4 lanes of traffic with 3 children is insane.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
surrealAmerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-11 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #10
20. It is.
Part of the problem here is a very poorly situated bus stop, and a irresponsible "urban planning".

I hope this woman has a good lawyer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-11 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. in the neighborhood i work in jaywalking is safer than crossing with the light
because when you jaywalk, the traffic that turns and overtakes you has a red light, if you cross with the light, the traffic that overtakes you (turning left onto a one way street) doesn't have a red --and frequently doesn't stop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudToBeBlueInRhody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-11 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #12
24. That's a huge bitch i have at certain streets I cross
Sometimes, I think the planners have their head up their ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xithras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-11 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. It's odd that they'd put a bus stop there.
In most of the cities I've visited, but stops are only located at or near intersections with crosswalks. I just looked up this spot on Google Maps (http://maps.google.com/maps?q=Austell+Rd+SE,++and+Austell+Circle+Marietta,+Cobb,+Georgia&hl=en&sll=33.909186,-84.559118&sspn=0.001781,0.003473&t=h&z=17), and it's a pretty long walk to the crosswalk from the spot where they were dropped.

IMHO, it's also a failure by the city to place its stops properly.

People like to complain about overegulation in California, but this is a good example of WHY regulation can be a good thing. It appears that she lives in a nearly new apartment complex. To build that in California today, the builders would have to do an EIR that would identify the projects impact on traffic patterns, including pedestrian traffic. Because it's a housing complex on a busy road, and because public transportation drops them off on the other side of the road, the EIR would have quickly identified the need for a crosswalk in front of the apartments, or to relocate bus stops to accomodate the new traffic, and required the builder to pay the cost of the changes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-11 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. Why isn't there a cross walk where the bus stop is? From the picture, they built a
shelter for waiting for the bus heading one way, but no crosswalk where the bus stops the other way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-11 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
13. the story does not say anything about how she went about "trying" to get across
intersection. was the light green for motorists? was the man going the speed limit, had the right away, and didnt have time to stop?

dont know

story does not say

why would they leave it out, for outrage
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-11 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. found this at Huffington Post:
Nelson had taken her children with her to shop for groceries and supplies for her upcoming birthday party. The working mother and college student regularly took public transportation, but she and her kids missed their intended bus that night, putting them an hour behind schedule. The bus they caught pulled up to their stop after nightfall, and Nelson stepped off, clutching her kids' hands through the shopping bags wrapped around her wrists. Nelson's apartment complex sits across the street from the bus stop, but the nearest crosswalk is three-tenths of a mile away. So Nelson did what everyone who uses that bus stop does, and what the other disembarking passengers all did that night: She crossed one side of the divided highway to the median, where she waited for a break in the traffic.

Several people then crossed the street before Nelson thought it was safe. She waited with her kids. But when others started to move towards the road, Nelson's son must taken it as a cue it was time to go. She felt his grip on her hand loosen and he darted out into the road. She followed. Guy's car struck Nelson, her son and her daughter, and the boy died.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/radley-balko/raquel-nelson-jail-for-jaywalking_b_905925.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-11 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. i am sad for all of them. i dont see it as the mans fault. i wondered if that is what
Edited on Thu Jul-21-11 02:18 PM by seabeyond
the boy might have done. i saw the picture of the street above and thought visual should be clear for motorists. but if the boy ran out, then that is the reason.

sometimes

it is just an accident.

on edit... thanks for further info

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-11 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. the dude was drinking and on pain meds..
surely he shares some responsibilty. the article i read stated that he had up to THREE hit and run incidents that day just prior to killing the kid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-11 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. yes i read it. but that is what bothers me about this story
it left out so much info and only put stuff in that would lead for all to be outraged with the driver.

surely they have the tox number that they leave out. he has already been in and out of jail. must not been much of anything since all they did was imply that it was his drinking. though he said he had soemthing to drink earlier in the day.

what time. how much. did it really effect him

then they throw out the previous hit and runs. again, nothing to do with this.

but all about creating an outrage.

the article is poor and manipulative, i believe. which makes me believe it less.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blasphemer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-11 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. I agree that the story linked in the OP is, at best, incomplete
The Huffington Post piece clarifies the situation and the writer's outrage is more appropriately directed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blasphemer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-21-11 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #16
25. I have crossed in a similar manner in a similar situation
Where my mother lives, there is a bus stop at a significant distance from the crosswalk and before bus service was extended and connection times adjusted, this bus stop was used in lieu of the one that does not require crossing a street at all. It was used in order to avoid missing the connecting bus since bus service is once per hour. On any given night, there were at least a dozen people crossing to a median and waiting for breaks in traffic in order to catch the bus. At times, I would find myself following someone across and imagining what would happen if I tripped and the break in traffic wasn't enough to avoid a potentially fatal accident. There is a lot of blame to go around for situations such as this one but I have a hard time imagining why anyone would consider prosecuting the parent to be a reasonable response. If jaywalking is not routinely punished then to do so in this case seems to be extraordinarily callous. I would be curious to know the demographic make-up up the jaywalkers at this bus stop. Where my mother lives, 95% of bus riders are minorities. If that is also the case in this area of Marietta, I have to agree with Mr. Balko that there are racial politics at play here. This was a horrible tragedy, and to punish this mother rather than address the flawed city planning that contributed to the death of her child is unconscionable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 12:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC