Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Looking for credible evidence of shooters political views.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
bighart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 11:09 AM
Original message
Looking for credible evidence of shooters political views.
Not hearsay (my third cousin played soccer with him in middle school and says thus and so) or speculation (he belonged to this group so he MUST be right leaning) but hard evidence to counter the "crazy leftist" going around at the office. Has anyone seen or heard anything quote worthy from this guy that reveals his political leanings and/or a possible motive?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
1. why bother.
you won't convince people. humans are not logical. they will continue to believe whatever they've been wired to believe. there is nothing you can do about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
2. how about he SHOT a democratic politician and 18 of her followers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bighart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Sorry but that isn't credible evidence.
It is speculation pure and simple. Saying that is like saying since Hinckley shot Regan he must have been a liberal, it doesn't work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
randr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
3. From what I have seen presented so far
Jared is most closely aligned with Sen. Ron Paul.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
4. Pete Williams was just saying on MSNBC that he apparently was disappointed
Edited on Mon Jan-10-11 11:14 AM by gateley
in Giffords personally, that he'd attended a function like this one, asked her a question and was unhappy with her response. He told a lot of people about this. I don't know whether or not she was still a Republican at the time, I didn't catch the date.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pintobean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #4
12. August 30, 2007
http://m.motherjones.com/politics/2011/01/jared-lee-loughner-friend-voicemail-phone-message?page=1

<snip>
On Sunday, federal prosecutors charged 22-year-old Loughner with one count of attempting to assassinate a member of Congress, two counts of unlawfully killing a federal employee, and two counts of attempting to kill a federal employee. Giffords was the target of Loughner's rampage, prosecutors say, and the sworn affidavit accompanying the charges mentions that Loughner attended a Giffords "Congress in Your Corner" event in 2007. The affidavit also mentions that police searching a safe in Loughner's home found a letter from Giffords' office thanking the alleged shooter for attending a August 30, 2007, event.

Tierney, who's also 22, recalls Loughner complaining about a Giffords event he attended during that period. He's unsure whether it was the same one mentioned in the charges—Loughner "might have gone to some other rallies," he says—but Tierney notes it was a significant moment for Loughner: "He told me that she opened up the floor for questions and he asked a question. The question was, 'What is government if words have no meaning?'"
"He said, 'Can you believe it, they wouldn't answer my question.' Ever since that, he thought she was fake, he had something against her."
<snip>

Linked in one of cali's threads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #12
40. Thanks - always leave it to you guys to find anything. DUoogle! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
5. His videos: Obsessed the the gold standard, obsessed with the constitution,
obsessed with English and people who won't speak English, Obsessed with Goverment practicing mind control. I do not know any liberals who are obsessed with the Gold Standard or are obsessed with people not speaking English

====

A good summary of video content here, but go see for yourself if they are still up. Incoherent.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/jan/09/jared-lee-loughner-rightwing-rants

Jared Lee Loughner: erratic, disturbed and prone to rightwing rants
Loughner echoes concerns of Tea Party movement in videos that reveal fears about government brainwashing

====

In a series of videos, he gave a rambling account of obsessions and paranoias that appeared to be troubling him with increasing intensity up to the catastrophe. They included references to conscious dreaming, or "conscience dreaming" as he called it, a process of directing one's own dreams that he is thought to have practised. Another was a belief in the gold and silver standard of currency – a favourite topic of the rightwing of American politics that is regularly propounded by the Fox News commentator Glenn Beck.

The tone of Loughner's rantings is almost exclusively conservative and anti-government, with echoes of the populist campaigning of the Tea Party movement. "Don't trust the government listener!" he said in one video, accusing Washington of mind control and brainwashing.

The US constitution, the bible of the Tea Parties, features heavily, as does the suggestion that the federal government is acting against the text. "You don't have to accept the federalist laws. Read the United States of America constitution to apprehend all of the current treasonous laws."

There is also a strong streak of implicit violence in the postings.

===

See WillPitts thread on that article

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x154515
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bighart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Have seen some of them and at best it could be concluded
that he was possibly libertarian.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Yes. And I think maybe that friend of his getting quoted is confusing "Liberal" with "Libertarian"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hassin Bin Sober Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #7
13. It's now been laid out for you.
Anyone who has been paying attention the last fews years knows the deal. In fact, we have been expecting it. So has the justice department.

I get the impression you aren't trying to sway your office.

What would constitute "proof" for you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bighart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #13
21. Not looking for "proof", just something credible.
What I have seen thus far seems to be speculation and hearsay. I have watched some of this guys videos, read some of his writings and maybe I am just stupid but he seems to me to be all over the place. I can't find anything so far that gives me any kind of clear indication of his political bent beyond possible libertarian.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #21
24. You just described Randy Paul, new GOP Senator from Kentucky.
But it's all just speculation and hearsay, right?

:rofl:

NGU.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. There is a big Libertarian component to the Tea Party
Some DU'ers don't appear to know that.

You cannot imagine how many "I am a Libertarian" defenders of the tea party I have interacted with on the internet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #7
14. Libertarians are just Rape-Publicans who want to smoke pot.
NGU.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jtown1123 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #5
34. You are correct. SPLC expert said these are right wing fringe ideas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nye Bevan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
8. Here's his "manifesto"
Hello, and welcome my classified leak of information that’s of the United States Military to the student body and you. Firstly, I want you to understand this from the start. Did you know grammar is double blind, listener? Secondly, if you want to understand the start of revelatory thoughts then listen to this video. I’ll look at you mother fuckin Anarchists who have a problem with them illegal illiterate pigs. :-D If you’re a citizen in the United States as of now, then your constitution is the United States. You’re a citizen in the United States as of now. Thus, your constitution is the United States. Laugh. I’ll let you in on their little cruel joke that’s genocidal. They’re argument is appeal to force on their jurisdiction with lack of proof of evidence. Each subject is in question for the location! The police don’t quite get paid correctly with them dirty front runners under section 10? Their country’s alliances are able to make illegal trades under section 10. Eh! I’m a Nihilist, not someone who put who put trust in god! What is section 10 you ask? If you make a purchase then it’s illegal under section 10 and amendment 1 of the United States constitution. You make a purchase. Therefore, it’s illegal under section 10 and amendment 1 of the United States constitution. We need a drum roll for those front runners in the election; those illegal teachers, pigs, and politicians of yours are under illegal authority of their constitution. Those dirty pigs think they know the damn year. Thirdly, tell them mother fuckers to count from 0 to whenever they feel a threat to stop their count. We can all hope they add new numbers and letters to their count down. Did you run out of breath around the trillions, listener? Well, B.C.E is yet to start for Ad to begin! What does this mean for a citizen in any country? Those illegal military personal are able to sign into a country that they can’t find with an impossible date! How did you trust your child with them fraud teachers and front runners, listener? Did you now know that the teachers, pigs, and front runners are treasonous! You shouldn’t jump to conclusion with your education plan. The constitution as of now, which is in use by the current power pigs, aren’t able to protect the bill of rights! Do you now have enough information to know the two wars are illegal! What is your date of time, listener? Fourthly, those applications that are with background checks break the United States constitution! What’s your riot name? I’ll catch you! Top secret: Why don’t people control the money system? Their Current Currency(1/1) / Your new infinite currency (1/~infinte) This is a selcte information of revoluntary thoughts! Section 10 – Powers prohibited of States No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility. No State shall, without the Consent of the Congress, lay any Imposts or Duties on Imports or Exports, except what may be absolutely necessary for executing it’s inspection Laws: and the net Produce of all Duties and Imposts, laid by any State on Imports or Exports, shall be for the Use of the Treasury of the United States; and all such Laws shall be subject to the Revision and Controul of the Congress. No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace, enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power, or engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay. Each subject is unlocatible!

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x144974
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xenotime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 11:28 AM
Original message
Looks like the ramblings of a RW lunitic to me.
"If you’re a citizen in the United States as of now, then your constitution is the United States." - Sounds like typical RW constitutional fetish

"make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts" - RW Obsession with gold and capitalism

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zax2me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
10. He cannot display political views
At least not with clarity. He has mental problems. To look for any political sanity within him is a futile effort and frankly a waste of time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bushisanidiot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
11. he showed up to a political event with a gun and assassinated the democratic congress member
that was holding the event.

of course it was political! why would a fellow democrat, or liberal shoot anyone, let alone another democrat for political reasons?

the right wing idiots are showing just how CRAZY they are when they try to defend themselves here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bighart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #11
15. Not to be disagreeable, but that isn't credible evidence>
It is merely speculation, guilt by association if you will.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nye Bevan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #11
16. Lee Harvey Oswald shot a Dem and he was a communist IIRC (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudToBeBlueInRhody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #11
20. So is John Hinkley a liberal then? (n/m)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MH1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
17. Opinion, but by an expert in the field of violent extremism; and with some facts included
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bighart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #17
22. That is an intelligent interpretaion of things.
Thanks for posting it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lifesbeautifulmagic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
18. who cares what his "political views" are
the indisputable facts are the violent rhetoric, the calls for assassination and revolution are coming from one side, and the people getting shot are Dem's.

http://www.csgv.org/issues-and-campaigns/guns-democracy-and-freedom/insurrection-timeline
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. +1
NGU.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrat_patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
23. See Post by Will Pitt **AHEM** on front page of DU.
Lays it out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jamastiene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
25. The only one I have seen so far that might be credible is at this link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shandris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
27. Here's your credible evidence:
Edited on Mon Jan-10-11 12:43 PM by Shandris
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x162478

His voter registration.

I notice the reply above me indicates that an article claims he was 'Independent'. Interesting.

EDIT: UPDATE: Debunked. I hate photoshoppers. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Motown_Johnny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. And We Have A Winner !!!!!
That is proof positive of his political views


Thanks for posting this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shandris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. No longer relevant (n/t)
Edited on Mon Jan-10-11 12:44 PM by Shandris
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sufrommich Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #27
32. Debunked as fake. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shandris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #32
35. Yeah, I just noticed -- and noted -- the update also. (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansasVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
28. You sound like a troll!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bighart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. Please explain how.
This is the only political message board I am a member of.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jtown1123 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
33. EVIDENCE: Olbermann's interview with the Southern Povery Law Center Expert
He says the grammar and currency references are right wing fringe group nonsense. You can find at at the Countdown website.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bighart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #33
37. I read the SPLC info after I posted this. It is very good information
and I am very glad to have read it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
36. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
IScreamSundays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
38. If you are really interested, most aren't
here is a thread that leads to a link of his internet postings on a conspiracy site.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x162302
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bighart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. Interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-10-11 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
41. So what evidence do they have at your office when they throw
around the 'crazy leftist' thing? Did you ask?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bighart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-11 08:01 AM
Response to Reply #41
42. "The Communist Manifesto" is all they have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC