Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Congressional Black Caucus plans to force GOP’s hand on debt vote

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
sasha031 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 04:19 PM
Original message
Congressional Black Caucus plans to force GOP’s hand on debt vote
Members of the Congressional Black Caucus, dissatisfied with the debt-ceiling deal negotiated by President Obama and leaders in Congress, are planning a procedural move on Monday that would require a majority of House Republicans to cast their votes on the measure before CBC members cast theirs.

“A quorum of the Caucus convened and agreed to abstain from voting until the majority of Republican members have voted on the debt ceiling package,” Rep. Andre Carson (D-Ind.), the caucus whip, said in an e-mail to CBC members Monday afternoon.

The CBC is comprised of 45 members – 44 Democrats and one Republican, Rep. Allen West (R-Fla.). Many of the group’s members have said they strongly oppose the debt-limit plan because it would make cuts to programs that benefit society’s most vulnerable -- including seniors, minorities and the poor -- while not calling for any tax increases as part of the “balanced” approach that Obama and congressional Democrats favor.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/2chambers/post/congressional-black-caucus-plans-to-force-gops-hand-on-debt-vote/2011/08/01/gIQAS9R4nI_blog.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cool Logic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 04:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. And the point would be...?
The only thing I can figure is that it might force some Rs to vote for it, who might not otherwise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Or to vote against it who might otherwise be coerced into voting for it.
It will certainly heighten the uncertainty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. Let the games begin.
Should make good watching.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
3. Good.
It is one of the very few groups in DC that I have even a drop of respect for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Same here. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kelly1mm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
4. Profiles in courage there. If it will pass w/ R votes they vote no. If not, then they vote yes. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crazylikafox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
6. Great! That's exactly what I asked my rep to do when I called this afternoon.
I told him to let the Republicans come up with the votes, since they are the ones who hijacked this process. Last time the Dems voted for the "good of the country", ie. TARP, the Pubs turned it against us in 2010. (even though it was a vote for Wall Street that the Pubs really wanted)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
7. They never really loved him. Pony wanters. This deal is so good even Norquist likes it.
They're probably secretly racists. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Major Hogwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
9. Somebody has to!! The leadership checked out a long time ago!
Too much heat in the kitchen for them, I guess!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
10. Balanced is just a RW euphemism signaling the old, frail, and poor will bear the entire burnt
of the sacrifice with the uber-wealthy and large corporations continuing to suck furtively at the public welfare trough. :patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 05:24 PM
Response to Original message
11. This is good. I love political strategy like this.
good job CBC!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 04:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC