Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Would we be in better shape with Hillary instead of Obama?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
newmexicodem Donating Member (19 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 10:40 PM
Original message
Would we be in better shape with Hillary instead of Obama?
Edited on Mon Aug-01-11 10:42 PM by newmexicodem
Would the debt ceilings talks have been different?

Would we have public option as Hillary vigorously campaigned for during the primaries?

Just curious if any of the folks who supported Obama and threw Hillary Clinton and her husband under the bus are having buyers remorse. I wonder if all of the Super Delegates during the primaries that back-stabbed Hillary despite her having the clear popular vote lead at the Convention have regrets now that Social Security and Medicare are on the cutting table. Most people even tried to erase her completely off the face of the map when they refused to select her as a VP candidate. But we got our change and hope alright

Bill Clinton was clear in saying he would have gone the 14th Amendment way and let the legal matters come as they may. Bill Clinton didn't back down when Newt Grinrich tried his COntract with America and shut down the government in 1996. Clinton came out the perceived winner and polls support that.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. No. But enjoy your stay on DU, and your complimentary pizza. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newmexicodem Donating Member (19 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. just nastalgic
Edited on Mon Aug-01-11 10:45 PM by newmexicodem
Don't get me wrong. I will vote for Obama again in the General as he will run unopposed in the primaries it appears. But just craving public option and Clinton-era 90s when it was all sunshine and rainbows
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peace frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 08:10 AM
Response to Reply #3
29. "just nostalgic" for what?
"Clinton-era 90s when it was all sunshine and rainbows"!1!! We need a *sunshine lollypops and rainbows* gif for that one. Cue Leslie Gore. :rofl:

Thanks for the laugh, I really needed one today. I'll remember this for a long time. **wiping tears of hilarity**
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
movonne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. They are all the same....the Clintons are DLCers and that is one
reason I didn't want her...but it look like Obama is one and kept it hidden...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
4. We would be better off if the electorate had not voted for TeaBaggers in2010
Primary season is over.

DU needs to get over its denial about the 2010 election results. Lawrence O'Donnell noted on election night that the results meant Republicans were going to hold the country hostage over raising the debt ceiling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
5. Does it matter?
Hillary Clinton is not the president and no amount of "what iffing" is going to make it so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
6. I really don't know...
Edited on Mon Aug-01-11 10:47 PM by hlthe2b
As much as I think many of our problems are the direct result of racism directed towards Obama--conceivably including some reticence on the part of the administration to do anything to incite more threats of violence as a result of this racism... I am not really convinced that the misogyny still inherent on the RW does not come close to equaling that fervor. As paradoxical as the teabagger embrace of Palin and Bachman might seem, I remind those who might give benefit of the doubt that it is only the "attractive youngish " conservative women that manage to escape their knee-jerk opposition. Do you ever hear them gushing over Kay Bailey Hutchison for example?

I remember the overt hatred directed towards HRC during the Clinton years and find it hard to be convinced that would not be even more in play if she were President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
murielm99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #6
26. I think it would be worse if she were President.
Not in terms of what she would do, but in terms of misogyny.

Racism and misogyny can't really be equated. But there is plenty of misogyny in our own party. There are plenty of Democratic men willing to stab their own female leaders in the back. Those men would be backstabbing Hillary.

I have been a leader on the local and county level of the party. I have felt it, and seen other women in the Democratic Party bear the brunt of it as well.

I am sure there is plenty of racism in our party, too. I don't see quite as much of it where I live, but it is there. And Obama is from my state.

I agree that many of the problems are the direct result of racism. And no one wants to talk about it.

What would she do if she were President? She isn't President. I don't even want to get into any of that. We don't know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
7. This is a duplicate.
One of these threads is already going. Why don't you delete this flamebait and join it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
8. I don't think so. There really was never much difference
between them. I ended up supporting Obama because he had opposed the war and I could never have supported any Democrat who voted for that war. But now I believe that if Obama had been in the Senate he would have voted for it anyhow.

She supported mandated insurance, he said he didn't, but then did in the end. Her foreign policies would have the same, maybe even worse.

I'm at the point where I don't think it matters who is in the WH, they will have to pursue the Corporate/MIC agenda. We have to focus on Congress, that's the only hope of seeing any changes imo..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
9. No. The oligarch has spoken and, without a doubt, Clinton is an intregal part of the oligarch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
10. Would we be in better shape with a strong filibuster-proof democratic congress?
There would be no debt ceiling crisis.
Leiberman and other Blue dogs wouldn't be able to kill the public option.

The GOP welcomes your support.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
11. Water under the bridge.
Edited on Mon Aug-01-11 10:51 PM by Blue_In_AK
Who knows? I think Obama's willingness to over-compromise has allowed the Republicans to drive the agenda. I think the Obama administration has sucked at messaging. But I can't say whether Hillary would have been better. It really doesn't matter at this point, because we are where we are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
12. Instead of Muslim Jokes we would have 3 days a month jokes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mysuzuki2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #12
27. i think she's past that "period" in her life.
i do think that she would have been a lot tougher negotiator than Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
13. No (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rageneau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 10:53 PM
Response to Original message
14. Say what you will - The Clintons were smart, capable, and PISSED OFF at the wingnuts.
Obama seems to like and trust these GOP assh*les entirely too much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. Correct.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DonCoquixote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 08:04 AM
Response to Reply #14
28. and also eager to prove
They could hippie punch and demonize minorities as much as any GOP could. Sorry, I for one am glad Hillary did not get her war with Iran that Tel Aviv has had on backorder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scarletwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
15. Squirrel!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Life Long Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
16. Social Security and Medicare are not on the cutting table.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
17. I actually think the GOP would become even more unhinged than they have been
The ire they directed at her baffled me in the nineties (and for a few years afterwards, when they kept..bringing..it up...); they seemed to hate her more than Bill Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue-Jay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
19. Of course!
Because we're all psychic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlabamaLibrul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
20. Hillary is a DLC tool (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CakeGrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 11:05 PM
Response to Original message
21. Woulda, Shoulda, Coulda...won't put Hillary in the WH. -nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gkhouston Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
22. Pointless speculation. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
23. No.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
24. No. Clinton and Obama get their money from the same Wall Street crowd.
Obama's big mistake is that he filled his cabinet with friends of Hillary and Bill.

Start with Robert Rubin and then just keep connecting the dots.

We need someone other than a Clinton or Obama.

The Clintons and Obama sold out long ago.

There used to be a video of Code Pink women trying to persuade Hillary Clinton that she should not support the war in Iraq. They explained that they had visited Iraq and that Bush was lying about the situation there. Hillary was so rude it was unbelievable. I have not liked her since watching that video.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-01-11 11:10 PM
Response to Original message
25. Doubtful. One ambitious New Democrat is much lika another.
I originally thought "Well, at least Obama isn't a Clinton". But, his actions (or lack of actions) dispelled that notion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-02-11 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
30. Doubt it.
I've seen lots of threads about the GOP hatred of Obama being motivated by racism, but they would have gone after Hillary just as bad, or worse, with different details.

Would a more aggressive response from her have solved problems, or escalated them? If she had responded pragmatically, then there would still be a large contingent of former supporters ready to toss her under the bus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 07:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC