Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Progressive? Depressed? .....Here's What's Next"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-11 08:23 PM
Original message
"Progressive? Depressed? .....Here's What's Next"
Edited on Thu Aug-04-11 08:59 PM by KoKo

By Mike Lux

On this depressing day when the crazies, willing to destroy what’s left of the economic engine that is barely sputtering down the road got their ransom paid, everyone has to pick themselves up and decide what to do next. The President, having once again (in his memorable words) given in to the hostage takers, has to decide how to rebuild his political coalition that is in tatters, and how to show some strength after looking weak. Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi have momentous decisions to make: Are they going to appoint strong negotiators who won’t back down on Democratic Party principles, or will they give away a crucial seat on the super-duper commission who will once again give in to Republican demands? And progressives have to decide as well: do we give up, move away, get out of politics — or do we get out of this depression we’re feeling and come up with a winning political strategy?

As to the President, what is important to understand is that he wanted this negotiation. He had opportunities to avoid it last year, getting this deal done as part of the lame duck budget deal, or at the beginning of this year by making clear that he would only sign a clean debt ceiling increase. But he waded into these negotiations willingly and eagerly, hoping that reason and Wall Street lobbyists would help him craft the grand compromise he was willing to make if the Republicans agreed to raise taxes. It was part of his long-term strategy for getting the deficit issue off his back — Ezra Klein’s piece here (which I have been assured by people at the White House that it very much reflected Obama’s thinking) lays out the thinking: cut a big dramatic budget deal, get the deficit issue off his back, look like a centrist going into the next election. And through most of this showdown, he did look far more reasonable than the Republicans and was doing better than them in the short-term polling. The problem is that if Republicans don’t ever compromise, if they don’t care about being reasonable or not blowing up the economy, the President is the one who would have to fold, and that is exactly what happened. It made him look weak, and it tore a gaping hole in his relationship with his base. D.C. centrists loved his reasonableness, his willingness to reach out, and all those other things praised in the editorial pages of the Washington Post, but even the pundits who were praising him — in fact, especially the pundits that were praising him — turned on him when he lost. Such is the nature of this town.

What he needs to do now is to show strength and reconnect with his disillusioned and depressed base. He needs to pick some fights with the Republicans who just beat him, and show he’s not willing to back down. He needs to take on the bankers (who once again came out of this entire showdown completely unscathed, fancy that) and aggressively move to revive the housing market. Most importantly, he needs to introduce a bold new jobs initiative with two tracks. The first track should be a legislative package in Congress. The Republicans will never agree to it, which will show people how little they care about actually creating jobs. The second track should be the initiatives that the administration can do itself to create jobs, things they don’t need Congress to help them on. There are at least five all-important things the administration could do right now that would make a big difference in creating jobs: aggressively move on China currency manipulation; force Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to write down underwater home mortgages; force the banks to write down underwater mortgages (which can be done through the administration’s regulatory powers and by pressing them on their servicers’ legal violations); step up enforcement of the “Buy American” provisions already in existing laws; and use the remaining TARP money authorized as a public bank to make investments in businesses that want to expand their workforce. All of these things would put more money into middle-class Americans’ pocketbooks, and would create real jobs right away.

These five policies, by the way, all have the added benefit of taking on the big banks on Wall Street, which will do more to show strength and rally his base than anything else Obama could do. Even more importantly, all of these initiatives would actually produce good jobs and help stabilize the American middle class, which is being crushed to death by the economy. As for Reid and Pelosi, they now have much of the future of their party resting in their hands. If even one Democrat is appointed who is a weak negotiator and/or is not a progressive, we could see another absurdly one-sided deal that will be like a worse horror movie sequel to this one (and the one before where Obama gave the Republicans tax cuts for the rich) — Capitulation 3: The Ax Cutting Continues. Given that option vs. the cuts that will come automatically because of the way the deal is written, the automatic cuts would be better because at least they involve a lot of military cuts and they hold at least some progressive priorities harmless. But progressives don’t control either chamber, and the pressure to pass the bill — from the punditry, and from defense contractor and health provider lobbyists — will be enormous, and we would almost certainly lose that fight, leaving us with one more terrible deal that would make Democrats look weak, and would dishearten and divide us even more going into the election year.

MUCH MORE of ARTICLE...about what PROGRESSIVES SHOULD DO at.............


http://crooksandliars.com/mike-lux/next

------------------

For those DU'ers who don't know Mike Lux's Creds: Michael Lux is the co-founder and CEO of Progressive Strategies, L.L.C., a political consulting firm founded in 1999, focused on strategic political consulting for non-profits, labor unions, PACs and progressive donors. He is also a partner at Democracy Partners, a progressive consulting firm. Previously, he was Senior Vice President for Political Action at People For the American Way (PFAW), and the PFAW Foundation, and served at the White House from January 1993 to mid-1995 as a Special Assistant to the President for Public Liaison. While at Progressive Strategies, Lux has founded, and currently chairs a number of new organizations and projects, including American Family Voices, the Progressive Donor Network, and BushRecall.org. Lux serves on the boards of several other organizations including the Arca Foundation, Americans United for Change, Ballot Initiative Strategy Center, Center for Progressive Leadership, Democratic Strategist, Grassroots Democrats, Progressive Majority and Women’s Voices/Women Vote.In November of 2008, Mike was named to the Obama-Biden Transition Team. In that role, he served as an advisor to the Public Liaison on dealings with the progressive community and has helped shape the office of Public Liaison based on his past experience working on the Clinton-Gore Transition, as well as in the White House.)

============================================



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CelticThunder Donating Member (460 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-11 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. Obama... "reconnect with his disilluioned and depressed base"?
Obama demonstrated once again today with his ridicule of AARP and dismissal of Medicare that that is the farthest thing from his mind.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-11 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. We have to have hope that we can "Turn Him." He's got over a year left...
we need to do this...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CelticThunder Donating Member (460 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-11 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. He has no intention of being turned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lifelong Protester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-11 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. A good read, some good ideas, and I see the unrecc folks are out!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue-Jay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-11 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. No! Not Thaaaat!
That would be terrible!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-11 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Sigh...they even trash our own Progressive Lobbyists...
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarlib Donating Member (178 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-11 08:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. I'm reccing, good article. thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Armstead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-11 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
7. Depressed and reccing..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tuesday Afternoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-11 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
8. k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
provis99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-11 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
9. well, that's pretty cynical.
In other words, Obama doesn't give a damn about liberals, but he needs their votes, so he should throw a threw crumbs in our general direction, and that will shut up the criticism enough for us to vote for him again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-11 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. The writer, Mike Lux...was on the Obama Transition Team...so yeah...it's pretty cynical
considering. But, if he sees this...what are we to think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RickFromMN Donating Member (275 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-11 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
12. Did President Obama really want these negotiations? Argh.

This must mean President Obama assumed the Republicans would negotiate in good faith.

Hopefully President Obama has learned from this mistake.

Hopefully we can recover from this mistake.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-04-11 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
13. kick for the night...I'm going to bed...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-11 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
14. one more....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Waiting For Everyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-11 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
15. The additional bad trade deals he's pushing isn't a good sign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 04:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC