Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why Democrats Need BERNIE SANDERS In The SUPER CONGRESS

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Segami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-11 12:12 AM
Original message
Why Democrats Need BERNIE SANDERS In The SUPER CONGRESS




:smoke: :smoke:


On The Last Word, Sen. Bernie Sanders demonstrated why Democrats need his voice in the super congress if they are going to protect Social Security and Medicare.

Host Lawrence O’Donnell asked Sen. Sanders about his odds of getting a seat on the super committee. Sanders answered, “I wouldn’t hold my breath, but I would certainly like to serve, but the fact of the matter is the Republicans are not going to ask the wealthiest people of the largest corporations to contribute one cent toward deficit reduction. The real issue is whether the Democrats will hold firm and make sure that they protect Social Security, which has not contributed one penny toward our deficit, whether they are going to protect Medicare and Medicaid and other important programs. That’s what the issue is.”




Sanders told Democrats to forget about the debt commission raising taxes on the wealthy, “No, forget about it completely. They have been enormously successful in saying they will defend to the last breath the richest people in this country and the corporations. That’s what they’ve said; it’s what they’ve done, and what they will continue to do. The real question is what the Democrats will do. Are they going to go in with similar force and strength, and say, excuse me, you’re not going to slash Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid, and we’re going to hold the line on that. Probably what the fight will evolve into is whether or not we make significant cuts in defense spending. As you know, we have tripled defense spending since 1997. We got weapons systems out there that were designed to fight the Soviet Union. We can make some significant cuts. I hope the Democrats are forceful in that area.




Sen. Sanders also said that he told Harry Reid not to appoint anyone who would cut Social Security or Medicare, “Well, I told Harry. As a matter of fact, I just spoke to Senator Reid the other day, and what I said to him is, Senator Reid, do not appoint anybody to that commission who will cut Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. The goal must be at the very least to start making significant cuts in military spending, which has tripled since 1997.” Sen. Bernie Sanders gets it. The Republicans are not going to appoint a single person to the committee that would vote to raise taxes. All six of their votes will be a solid no against any revenue increases, so for Democrats the game is really about protecting Social Security and Medicare while cutting the defense budget.




The Democrats in the House are dead set against changes to Social Security and Medicare, so Nancy Pelosi is not going to put a single vote on that committee/super congress/whatever you want to call it that would even consider cutting entitlements. However, liberals who would protect Social Security and Medicare are scarcer in the Senate. Sherrod Brown and Al Franken would be two solid members. The problem is that Brown and Franken are in their first terms. In a seniority heavy Senate system the odds of one or both getting a seat on the committee is unlikely.



cont'


http://www.politicususa.com/en/bernie-sanders-super-congress



.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-11 12:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. supplanting a Repuke position...
but nothing of the sort will happen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-11 12:24 AM
Response to Original message
2. He said he wants to do it on LO tonight
but he had a look of ... it will never happen. He is after all a socialist!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ruby the Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-11 12:30 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. His own newsletter today confirmed: 6 Democrats 6 Republicans.
He is neither. Thankfully.

Sorry to say, but thats how the bill was written.

Yes, I know he caucuses with Dems, but so does Joe Lieberman (sometimes). The bill was written across party lines, not caucuses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 06:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC