CLANG
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-10-11 05:54 PM
Original message |
UNDENIABLE Proof that Palin KNEW it was a bullseye target |
CLANG
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-10-11 06:02 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Please help keep this kicked. Everyone should know this! |
|
It flies in the face of every Palin apologist I've heard since the shooting.
|
somone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-10-11 06:03 PM
Response to Original message |
Blue Owl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-10-11 06:04 PM
Response to Original message |
3. What's that, Sarah? You didn't pull the trigger? |
|
Well hey, Bin Laden didn't fly the planes, either.
|
Parker CA
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-10-11 06:05 PM
Response to Original message |
malaise
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-10-11 06:08 PM
Response to Original message |
Duer 157099
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-10-11 06:13 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Anybody care to paraphrase? |
|
For those of us who can't/don't want to listen to a video?
|
Motown_Johnny
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-10-11 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
9. tweet refers to bullseye icons as targets |
|
and goes on to say they won 18 or the 20 seats
|
Whisp
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-11-11 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
17. apparently the day before some kids were caught |
|
on facebook for meeting up to gang up on a teacher. they were arrested or the event at least did not happen as it was reproted.
some jerkoff on Palins site is hi - fiving the deaths in AZ and wish for more, in pretty straight out language on palins tweet or book or whatever it is. the speaker in the video is asking why those kids got stopped and why this guy name something Kerr, with his picture as avatar (supposed) is not arrested for what he threatened.
very good, overall. Maybe there will be a transcript of it soon.
|
Kingofalldems
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-10-11 06:18 PM
Response to Original message |
kimmerspixelated
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-10-11 06:20 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Just Wow! I agree- find that jackass he mentioned. Question his ass.
|
Matariki
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-10-11 06:20 PM
Response to Original message |
10. It's just a tactic. Get people talking about the FAKE ISSUE of whether she knew they were targets |
|
and avoid THE REAL conversation.
|
CLANG
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-10-11 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
11. But they underestimate those of us with more than half a brain. |
samsingh
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-11-11 11:47 AM
Response to Original message |
12. wouldn't see be incredibly stupid if she did'nt know it was? |
Kurovski
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-11-11 05:49 PM
Response to Original message |
bluestate10
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-11-11 05:54 PM
Response to Original message |
14. It is obvious that Palin is either insanely dense, or is a bald faced liar. |
|
Edited on Tue Jan-11-11 05:54 PM by bluestate10
Palin knew what the crosshairs meant. She intended to convey the meaning of what they meant to her adherents. For her to now attempt to call crosshairs surveyor's markers is insulting to the intelligence of anyone that has an IQ higher than 50.
|
Whisp
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-11-11 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
19. both. but she expects most everyone else to be as well. |
Whisp
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-11-11 06:01 PM
Response to Original message |
15. rec'd. that was awesome and goosebumply. |
upi402
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-11-11 06:01 PM
Response to Original message |
16. Must see. Half our party would see OlFart as the opposition |
|
Our own leaders want us to STFU and take it
|
Rex
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-11-11 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
spanone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-11-11 06:28 PM
Response to Original message |
20. how about her own tweet.... |
DragonSlave
(30 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-11-11 06:42 PM
Response to Original message |
21. Please don't imply that there's even a question about this |
|
Its obviously supposed to be a gun sight. THERE WAS NEVER ANY QUESTION ABOUT THIS. We should be mocking the Republican consistency story.
|
CLANG
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-11-11 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #21 |
23. We never had the question - but some do |
|
The info being gathered will hopefully help convince people of the truth.
|
HuckleB
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-11-11 07:01 PM
Response to Original message |
sabrina 1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-11-11 07:26 PM
Response to Original message |
stuntcat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-11-11 07:30 PM
Response to Original message |
25. don't retreat, RELOAD |
The Restoration
(2 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-11-11 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #25 |
26. The more I read about it, I keep thinking of a case called |
|
Watts vs. US, I'm completely suprised no one here is discussing it. For those who don't know what it is. http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=394&invol=705
|
CLANG
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-11-11 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #26 |
27. I hope you liked your pizza. |
|
Edited on Tue Jan-11-11 09:21 PM by CLANG
|
stuntcat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-12-11 08:18 AM
Response to Reply #26 |
|
I am serious, peace to you.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Apr 30th 2024, 03:11 AM
Response to Original message |