Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Guardian UK: The zombie of neoliberalism can be beaten – through mass direct action

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-11 06:31 AM
Original message
Guardian UK: The zombie of neoliberalism can be beaten – through mass direct action

The zombie of neoliberalism can be beaten – through mass direct action
Phone hacking and police corruption represent neoliberalism's undead status, even as it marches on. Yet change is possible

David Harvie and Keir Milburn
guardian.co.uk, Thursday 4 August 2011


Just days after the deal that was supposed to banish it, the eurozone crisis is back. Poor growth figures put a "new" financial collapse back on the cards. The response from politicians, bankers and business leaders is more of the same – more of the same neoliberal policies that got us into this situation in the first place.

Neoliberalism no longer "makes sense", but its logic keeps stumbling on, without conscious direction, like a zombie: ugly, persistent and dangerous. Such is the "unlife" of a zombie, a body stripped of its goals, unable to adjust itself to the future, unable to make plans. It can only act habitually as it pursues a monomaniacal hunger. Unless there is a dramatic recomposition of society, we face the prospect of decades of drift as the crises we face – economic, social, environmental – remain unresolved. But where will that recomposition come from when we are living in the world of zombie-liberalism?

In the midst of such hopelessness the phone-hacking scandal seemed to offer a moment of redemption, but as the news cycle moves on we are left wondering what effect it will really have.

Hackgate cannot be treated in isolation. Since the financial "meltdown" of 2007-08 we have witnessed similar scenes, and similar outrage, around MPs' expenses and bankers' bonuses. We have witnessed not one but two media feeding frenzies around the repression of protest. The first followed the police attack on the G20 protests in 2009 and the death of Ian Tomlinson, with the second erupting around the outing of undercover police officer Mark Kennedy, leading to the unprecedented unmasking of another five undercover police officers acting within the environmental and anti-capitalist movements. The refusal of the Metropolitan police to investigate the full extent of phone hacking is, then, the third scandal revealing the political character of contemporary policing. .............(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/aug/04/neoliberalism-zombie-action-phone-hacking



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-11 06:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. Recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geckosfeet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-11 07:05 AM
Response to Original message
2. The use of the word 'liberal' in neoliberalism seems to me to be misplaced.
Edited on Fri Aug-05-11 07:07 AM by geckosfeet
My understanding of neoliberal economics would place it more directly as nationalism or corporatism. See a short history of the evolution of neoliberal economics here ( Wikipedia entry for neoliberalism).

I am not sure how complete privatization of the state can ever lead to anything good. This is essentially what the founding fathers of the United States warned against, and wrote a constitution and declaration of independence to defend the country against. The difference between now and then, is that corporate factions now exercise the oppressions once practiced by monarchies and dictatorships. The dangers and hazards to free citizens once presented by oppressing monarchies still exist and seem to be growing at an alarming, uncontrolled rate because government is too weak, corrupt and influenced to legislate legal controls over nationalist corporations.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 03:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC