Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Breaking: non-farm payrolls up 117,000 in July - unemployment fell 0.1% to 9.1%

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-11 07:32 AM
Original message
Breaking: non-farm payrolls up 117,000 in July - unemployment fell 0.1% to 9.1%
Edited on Fri Aug-05-11 07:38 AM by jpak
Private sector added 154,000

MSNBC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dawgs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-11 07:35 AM
Response to Original message
1. I think it's 117,000, not 177,000. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-11 07:37 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Not sure the 177,000 is coming from, but MSNBC is saying 154,000
AND 117,000. Not sure what they're talking about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawgs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-11 07:46 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. 154,000 private sector. 117,000 total. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
econoclast Donating Member (259 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-11 07:36 AM
Response to Original message
2. Actually I think 117,000.
Think in the excitement, you had a typo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-11 07:36 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. yup - and fixed
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buns_of_Fire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-11 07:54 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. 177,000, 117,000, whichever. The figures will be "revised" in a few weeks, anyway.
And as usual, no one will notice the revised figures, since they'll be buried on page 12A.

They could just about report anything they damned well want to. Who's gonna know? If it aids the perception that we're pulling out of this and therefore every congresscritter should be re-elected because they're doing such a terrific job and you can expect your Government Pony any day now, it'll serve its purpose.

Cynical? Hey, not me!:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-11 07:37 AM
Response to Original message
4. My employer had five quarters of double-digit growth in earnings,
Edited on Fri Aug-05-11 07:38 AM by Kolesar
with last quarter having been an all-time record!

The problem is that the manufacturing index fell to a middling 50-1/2 and durable goods orders are flagging.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-11 07:49 AM
Response to Original message
7. Wait...No! Wall St sold off because everything is SOUR!
Damn, and I went short on the US along with Cantor :(

Well, maybe the rest of the sheep will follow the foreign markets over the cliff...


:Sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-11 07:53 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Most economists expected 75,000 - so the shorts got got fucked
at least oil is down - $82 a barrel right now as far as I can see...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-11 07:49 AM
Response to Original message
8. Futures Jump After Positive Jobs Report
Edited on Fri Aug-05-11 07:50 AM by Ian David
Futures rallied Friday after a government jobs report that trumped expectations, following a sharp global selloff across in the previous session as investors were rattled over fears the European debt crisis was spreading to Spain and Italy.

Hiring picked up in July as the Labor Department reported employers added 117,000 jobs last month and the unemployment rate dipped to 9.1 percent, an improvement from the past two months. Economists had expected a gain of 85,000 jobs.

"Wow! An incredible surprise considering the horrific macro points we've received the past few months," said Todd Schoenberger, managing director of LandColt Trading. "Personal spending, manufacturing, GDP—all of this kept traders awake at night."

"Risk will reenter the markets, especially after yesterday's poisoned session," added Schoenberger. "Look for yields to rise, as well, with investors shifting allocations before the weekend."

More:
http://www.cnbc.com/id/44031109


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jeff47 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-11 08:03 AM
Response to Original message
11. Not good news
It's widely accepted that we need about 125,000 jobs/month to keep up with population growth. (Most estimates are between 90,000 and 150,000).

So this report says we're treading water. It's not bad news, like 50,000 jobs would be. But it's also not improving the unemployment situation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
econoclast Donating Member (259 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-05-11 08:04 AM
Response to Original message
12. One downer however...
Is that the labor force participation rate Fell.

193,000 people left the labor force. That is what helped drive the inployment rate down to 9.1%

Netting 117,000 jobs added. Less 193,000 who left the labor force. Negative 76,000

Not too good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC