ChoppinBroccoli
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-05-11 09:47 PM
Original message |
This Is The Result Of Republicans Getting 98% Of What They Want |
|
Just keep repeating that line anytime the subject of the economy or this "credit crisis" comes up.
I want Boner to OWN that statement.
|
SpiralHawk
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-05-11 09:53 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Definitely the RepubliBaggers fault |
|
They made this happen in their ongoing effort to make America fail.
|
msongs
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-05-11 09:58 PM
Response to Original message |
2. once again, dems voted for it and Obama signed it. everyone gets blame here nt |
ChoppinBroccoli
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-05-11 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. To Borrow An Argument From Another Issue.......... |
|
..........they voted for it only because the alternative was so much worse. And sometimes you have to choose the lesser of two evils whether you like it or not.
|
B Calm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Aug-06-11 05:29 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
8. Do you blame hourly workers for piss poor management? |
Kablooie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-05-11 10:09 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Now they are getting the last 2%. The collapse of the rest of our economy. |
JoeyT
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Aug-06-11 05:07 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Sat Aug-06-11 05:08 AM by JoeyT
A few days ago we got nearly everything we wanted and the Oompa Loompa was lying about getting what they wanted because it was nearly all good. Now they got 98% of what they wanted because it's nearly all bad. Unless S&P is lying, which apparently they are, in which case...Hell if I know.
These talking points are nearly impossible to follow.
Edited to add: I tend to think they got 98% of what they wanted, and this is the end result. Republican economic policy is utter garbage.
|
Laura PourMeADrink
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Aug-06-11 05:16 AM
Response to Original message |
6. excellent point ! But, it doesn't sound like even if we had gotten |
|
revenues in there it would have helped. S&Ps looking for long term reform on medicare and SS.
|
NightWatcher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Aug-06-11 05:24 AM
Response to Original message |
7. Just sounds like another crazy group screaming for spending cuts instead of revenue increases |
|
Spending cuts will kill the Middle and Poor and the backbone of this country.
When will people get it that if you need money, you raise money. You don't cut spending.
Fuck the S&P, why do we give them power? The rich banksters are going to ruin us if we keep giving them the chance.
|
_ed_
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Aug-06-11 08:56 AM
Response to Original message |
9. Sorry, but there are two sides to this |
|
the side that "won" the 98% and the side that "lost" by getting 2%.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat May 04th 2024, 12:35 AM
Response to Original message |