RB TexLa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-08-11 07:03 PM
Original message |
I haven't turned the television on in a while, I didn't realize real people are blaming S & P for |
|
issuing a rating. I wasn't surprised at internet message board "journalists" but I had no idea that real people are doing this. That's insane.
|
BanzaiBonnie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-08-11 07:12 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Standard and Poors lacks credibility |
|
After their assisance to Wall Street in the mortgage debacle.
|
RB TexLa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-08-11 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
TheDebbieDee
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-08-11 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
6. Yes, really, S&P does lack credibility! |
|
S&P gave solid ratings to the marketers of those fradulent mortgage bundles of the 2008. Some companies invested in those phony mortgage based on the glowing ratings bestowed by S&P.
|
RB TexLa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-08-11 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
7. You don't have to trust them, you can go by Moody's or Finch Ratings |
|
but they still are regarded as the most credible ratings firm.
|
TheDebbieDee
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-08-11 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
9. Lacking credibility means that no one trusts S&P anymore......... |
|
I'm not understanding what it is that we're disagreeing about RB TexLa.
|
RB TexLa
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Aug-09-11 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
10. They are very trusted. That's what we disagree about. Where do you get the idea that |
jpgray
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-08-11 07:19 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Do you know how they rate sovereign debt? |
|
Edited on Mon Aug-08-11 07:20 PM by jpgray
Neither do they. They rate securities by collecting fees to run the banks' own risk models. What's their process and track record for rating sovereign debt, in your view? What gave Lehman an A rating for so long, do you think? After their downgrade of Japan, it was a shame no one wanted to let Japan borrow, no?
|
tjwash
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-08-11 07:24 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Mon Aug-08-11 07:25 PM by tjwash
S&P were the ones that bundled up mortgage backed securities during the housing bubble, and gave them a AAA ratings just so they would have an easier time dumping them off to Europe and China. Remember when they were caught with their hands in the cookie jar doing it, with those emails referring to them as "toxic assets?"
However...this correction was actually inevitable, and has been a long time coming. The downgrade aside...they should have just let the banks that were "too big to" fail back in 2007, instead of just handing them close to a trillion dollars. Turns out the banks did exactly what all of us were saying they would do back then--put just enough of it in to stop a hard crash, piss the rest of of it away as bonuses, and get the fuck out of Dodge.
|
EFerrari
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-08-11 07:25 PM
Response to Original message |
5. They issued Lehman a AAA rating just before they went belly up. |
|
Real people really think they are full of cr@P.
|
lynne
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Aug-08-11 08:40 PM
Response to Original message |
|
- that if they hadn't downgraded and had issued an AAA rating instead, we'd be in love with them right now.
Killing the messenger, IMO.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Apr 30th 2024, 04:34 PM
Response to Original message |